Skip to main content

Surrender to Traders

Courtesy: Internet


Government employees belonging to the Leftist unions in Kerala have been on strike for the last 5 days.  They are opposing the contributory pension scheme that the state govt has implemented for staff  from April this year.

What the govt of Kerala is telling the employees is that they should contribute 10% of their basic salary and DA (dearness allowance) to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority.  The govt will make an equal contribution.  When they retire they be eligible to withdraw 60% of the amount in the Fund and will receive a monthly pension from the remaining amount.

Most of the states in India and the central govt offices have already implemented this scheme.

The govt of Kerala has certain valid arguments for implementing the scheme.  The govt says that 80.61% of state’s revenue goes towards payment of salaries and pensions for govt employees. A meagre 19.39% is left for looking after the welfare of the 3.25 crore people of Kerala.  This is not a balanced distribution of the revenue.

The employees argue that the Pension Fund is investing the money in the share market, mutual funds and bonds issued by banks.  The share market does not and cannot guarantee any fixed returns.  Will there be any worthwhile amount given as pension when the employees retire?  Gauging by the returns currently yielded by the equity-based schemes, there won’t be.

The employees’ anxiety is genuine.  The govt’s arguments are valid too.

One wonders whether we cannot have any better investment schemes than the unreliable stock market.  Why should the governments capitulate to the stock market and the traders?

Recently the Nobel laureate-economist, Joseph Stiglitz, showed that the top 1% of Americans possess 25% of the country’s income and one-third of its wealth. 90% of the gains of growth go the top 1%. The plight of most Americans worsened in the last several years.  Who are these 1% people? They are the ‘monopolists’, people in the finance sector, and those who earn corporate revenues. 

There is growing unemployment, inequality and frustration in America, thanks to its economic policies.  Why should we too follow those policies?  Don’t we have other options?

Professor Robert Wade, who shared the platform with Stiglitz, accused America of promoting plutonomy.  Plutonomy means economic growth that is powered and consumed by the wealthiest upper class of the society.  In such a system, the government is quite powerless.  Power shifts from government to the business people.

Professor Ravi Kanbur, another speaker, cited examples of countries which did not follow the American policies to show that there was much less inequality in those countries.

I wonder why our government cannot redeem our economy from the traders.

Our Prime Minister has promised us a bleaker future.  He has assured us that the prices of many things including diesel will rise soon.  Subsidies will be gradually removed. 

It is the end of the welfare government in our country, in short.

Private employers will be free to cut wages and allowances as they are doing already.

Who will benefit?  We know that. 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

  1. VetirmagalJanuary 12, 2013 at 10:59 PM

    I have read many adverse comments on our initial policies of social economics. But this picture that is emerging is more scary.( I have seen the returns in employees'Pf annuities, almost nil in USA, now.)

    What happens to all our pension funds, how are the senior citizens going to sustain?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 13, 2013 at 9:23 AM

      The pension funds now are just another means for helping the capitalists and industrialists to run their business with other people's money.

      Imagine this situation, the 10% contributed by the employee and the govt each is invested in a recurring deposit in a bank. The returns will be much better than what the present pension scheme will give. Yet why does the govt insist on investing the money in equity-based schemes?

      Perhaps, we may have to control liberalisation of economy now that our economic growth is quite ok.

      Delete
  2. mandakolathurJanuary 12, 2013 at 11:57 PM

    I am sure I am wrong, but I see this as a demand by the government that people gain financial literacy even before they become literate!

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 13, 2013 at 9:24 AM

      Does the govt want to convert every citizen into some kind of a trader?

      Delete
    2. mandakolathurJanuary 13, 2013 at 10:14 AM

      Yes, so the illiterates even while becoming financially literate can contribute to the growth of the country, reckoned in aggregates, to the benefit of the already grown!

      RE

      Delete
  3. Prasanna RaghavanJanuary 13, 2013 at 1:08 PM

    Hi Tom, you have said it. But here in south Africa we are all on contributory pension, and the money is managed by a corporate body. Here it is going very well. So I doubt whether it does not depend on how the economy is handled by each nation. Yes America is the extreme; The civil servants are raising some points, right, but do they do justice to what they earn? I have been in South Africa for the past 18 years, I have not paid a single cent as bribe here; nobody expects it; the entire public service system is service oriented.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM

      Prasanna, if our money is managed properly by the govt or its agency there will be no problem. The problem is when the govt misuses it in order to cater to the interests of a certain section that has vested interests only. America started this process, this style. India is following it blindly.

      Bribe is quite a different issue, anyway. Perhaps, it will take centuries to make India bribe-free!

      Delete
  4. indu chhibberJanuary 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM

    Very informative post.Might of money speaks like nothing else-remember Radia Tapes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM

      Yes, Indu, only money speaks today. And when money speaks, nobody checks the grammar.

      Delete
  5. JoeJanuary 13, 2013 at 10:37 PM

    Money in stock market does not in any direct way influence the wealth of private companies contrary to public perception. SEBI (read govt body) is the only unit which gains from trading through transaction taxes. Private companies gain money only during IPOs.So it doesn't mean the government is trying to boost the other sectors...It just means that the Pension fund is ready to gamble with the money.We can only hope it is a calculated gamble!
    Speaking of America, we all know Occupy Wall Street was just the start!
    Great post!
    Cheers :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 14, 2013 at 4:53 PM

      Joe, you may be speaking from a perspective quite different from that of India. If money in stock market does not influence the wealth of private companies, why do our (Indian) private companies indulge in such malpractices as insider trading and raise the prices of their stocks? I don't know how the stock market works. But I know that there's a lot of malpractice in it.

      Secondly, why would the employees opt for gambling with their money? What right has the govt to do that?

      Delete
    2. VetirmagalJanuary 14, 2013 at 7:23 PM

      It is obvious the private players want the money that is with the govt. as pension funds. And the Govt( or whoever), want to make a fast profit( if at all the can), on the funds. It is all in the book balances which is an eyesore for vultures.

      If only Govt machinery had poured all those plan outlays of the six decades,in the proper channels,without leaching out on the way , there would have been no need to eye those funds!!

      As you rightly suggested de-liberalisation could be better.

      Delete
    3. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 14, 2013 at 9:54 PM

      Yes, Pattu, that's exactly what I'm suggesting. De-liberalise.

      Delete
  6. Woman'n'BeyondJanuary 14, 2013 at 10:16 AM

    very informative post indeed. This is certainly the end of welfare government.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sunil DeepakJanuary 14, 2013 at 6:22 PM

    The neoliberal values permeate all countries, bulldozing all opposition, in spite of so much evidence showing the damages they cause

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 14, 2013 at 9:50 PM

    That's called POWER, Sunil ji.

    I'm living in that POWER.

    Every Indian is living at that unfortunate level.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...
39 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...
30 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...
28 comments
Read more