Skip to main content

The Politics of Vegetarianism


In a recent article in the Economic and Political Weekly, the authors argue that vegetarianism in India is more a cultural and political phenomenon than a conscious choice that stems from any concern for the well-being of animals.

The article starts with the basic premise that “in India, vegetarianism, and particularly the advocacy of the same, is seen as the product of conservative, often right-wing, beliefs and attitudes.”  However, there is a sizeable section of the country’s population that does not want to be seen as conservative and much less right-wing.  The world is becoming increasingly globalised and people’s choices and preferences are guided by what is perceived as chic beyond the narrow confines of one’s national and/or religious culture.  Dining out in a multinational eatery like KFC or McDonald’s is not merely a matter of the palate or the belly, but a statement of one’s social and economic status.  Indians belonging to the upper economic classes do not want to be seen as conservative.  They see themselves as progressive and belonging to the wider global culture.

There was a time in the holy cow’s India (until recently) when non-vegetarianism was associated with the lower castes and the economically backward.  The authors of the above article argue that the recent shift to non-vegetarianism among many people who were vegetarians earlier is due to the fact that non-vegetarianism is losing its cultural bias in the country.  In other words, these new non-vegetarians are opting for the global culture.

Such a transition from vegetarianism would not have occurred if the vegetarianism was founded on any solid ideology like concern for the well-being of the animals.  The naked truth is that the vegetarians never had any qualms about wearing leather shoes, leather jackets and other leather products while they shunned non-vegetarian food.  What they actually shunned was the lower caste/class associations that non-vegetarianism was polluted with.  The authors of the above-mentioned article also point out that the vegetarians in India relied heavily on dairy products to meet their protein requirements. 

Today we have a union government that goes out of the way to protect certain animals particularly of the bovine family.  Is the move motivated by any noble ideology or by sheer politics?

People in the west are increasingly moving towards vegetarianism because of their concern for animals as well as the environment.  Their transition is an informed choice that comes from an elevated consciousness level.  Can the government of India bring about such a transition in the country?  Can it alter the consciousness level of the people?  Can it instil genuine sensitivity in the minds of the people?

Can a government that has not revealed much sensitivity for many sections of the citizens on account of their religious affiliations actually generate sensitivity towards animals?

In another and more scholarly article in the same issue of the EPW [Marginality and Historiography], Amit Kumar and Fayaz Dar tell us that shaping the history of any country is “a deeply political act”.  Politics impels the creators of history to ignore some people.  “Everything is not said in our stories,” the authors tell us.  “There are certain silences; some forgetting and some remembering is continuously at work...”

Such selective forgetting and remembering may be inevitable in the manufacture of history.  Nevertheless, if the selectivity of our remembering and forgetting can be restricted as much as possible, we can usher in an era of informed choices.  There will be no need to ban anything then.  Vegetarianism will be an ideological choice then rather than a political one.  

Comments

  1. It has been quite a debatable issue in current times. Rather than seeing it's political & religious aspect, we should think of our personal choice, well-being and animal welfare while choosing to be a vegan or not. And yes, using leather, silk & other animal products indulges in animal cruelty less or more. Very informative post Mr. Matheikal. Thanks for putting this up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Food should be a personal choice and the government should not meddle with people's tastes. But the government can work on a lot of other things...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. In that case humans meat consumption should also be allowed, if it is one's personal choice. And in that case no progressive intellectual sanctimonious seculars should howl over my choice then ? Another question which baffles me is how the heck ' an elevated consciousness level ', can be achieved in some religions particularly in ISLAM ?

      Ok, I understand the predicaments of people living in harsh conditions; Iceland and Russia for example. Yes they would have to eat non-vegetarian food in order to survive.

      But why people in INDIA eat non-vegetarian food. I mean, name a crop which cannot be grown in India ? Why don’t we realize that how blessed we are with the vast fertile land.
      It really hurts when the statistics shows we are the largest beef exporter.

      And to all the rightist why the heck ban only Beef ?

      I know that 'meat ban' is as similar like 'capital punishment' which has no deterrence at all. I also know when God himself can't eradicate meet ban even at times of Ramayana and Mahabharata, then who the heck we humans are. Guffaw.

      But, when we are going to achieve that elevated consciousness level………….sigh.

      Sorry for the hodgepodge done on your blog.
      Hope you are fine sir.
      And I really missed your mind churning, inspirational Blogs :)
      Hope you would be more frequent in your writings to educate people like us.

      Delete
  3. What to eat is one's personal choice & that should be the end of it. Howling right wingers do not see it that way. In addition they would like to impose the attire, the language, the rituals & so on of their & only their choice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Raghav,
    For some mysterious reason my laptop is not opening the replies box. So let me respond to you in this separate comment.
    Food is or should be a personal choice. There was a time when some people at least ate human flesh. As their consciousness level rose, they changed their food habits. I have borrowed the phrase ‘consciousness level’ from Richard Dawkins and I find it very helpful to explain a lot of things. It is a rise in the consciousness level that keeps human civilisation moving ahead. People stopped burning women in the name of witch-hunt, burning heretics at the stakes, throwing people to wild beasts for public entertainment in coliseums, when the consciousness level rose.
    Secondly, as you have implied, there is a close relationship between geography and food habits. You mentioned the cold places where meat eating may play a role. People in coastal areas depend on fish as naturally as people in Rajasthan depend on camel milk. India has a wide variety of geographical regions which naturally implies a wide variety of eating habits. Imposing the eating habits of one particular region on people from other regions is certainly undesirable.
    When are we going to achieve that elevated consciousness level? You ask. How many centuries did it take for the witch hunt to stop? How many centuries did it take for the sati system to change?
    Finally, thanks for letting me know that I inspire :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Some how the priorities and policies being implemented these days looks highly screwed..

    Welcome back, Sir.. :) Long time..You were being missed in the blogosphere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's because it is politics rather than ideology that drives the policies and priorities.

      Thanks for the welcome. I'm passing through a queer state created largely by an invisible godfather who has played a lot of games in my life and behaves like the Biblical Yahweh with all the malice and caprice.

      Delete
    2. Oh.. that sounds quite grave. I too get disturb by people around me but then I also know that nobody can dictate or disturb our lives unless we want them too. :) Its all in our minds. We need to just break free from the imaginary chains, it has created.

      Delete
  6. Absolutely loved the piece. Very thought provoking. I am a vegetarian myself and it answers to what should be the reason. With all the frustration we take out on hypocrites in India, we never think of ourselves as one. I'll be saying goodbye to the leather jacket now. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am a non-vegetarian and have never thought much about the environmental impacts of it all.My parents are doctors,so we've always really emphasised on the need to consume animal protein and fat in the right amounts.Also,turns out I am pretty underweight right now and my mother would never let me go veg even if I told her.
    Now,the thing is,if I would tell her.I can't remember if I ever even tried to fast in any ritual or worshipped flattening the first half of my body on the floor,just looks silly to me and my family has been growing more atheist as days have passed.And of course I wouldn't listen to Modi if he told me to go veg (though the butchering of any creature disturbs me.I maintain distance from the place and then like the other stupid people around us,forget about it.).Also,I believe if you go completely veg,you could perhaps resist a lot of KFC and McDonalds,which are sources of more problems than you can study in a day.All in all,a very debatable issue indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Food is inescapably related to culture. Having been born and brought up in a culture that assimilates certain non-veg items as integral parts of its cuisine, you will simply find it natural to have those non-veg foods. It's the same case with me too.

      Health is more important than anything else. So it's better you have your non-veg and look after yourself than worry about the environment right now :)

      Delete
  8. I'm a vegetarian by birth, and by choice. My mother was a non-vegetarian by birth; she is a vegetarian by choice. I don't think vegetarianism is less cruel. The people who say this are forgetting that plants have life too. Why should killing innocent plants be lauded but not killing innocent animals?
    Secondly, the birth of vegetarianism in India was due to practicality not humanity. In the very ancient past, the upper caste used to sacrifice cows in the yagnas, and eat them. When use of cows, and bulls in agriculture and other stuffs was discovered, the upper caste which enjoyed the fruits of sacrifices were forced to change their lifestyle or lose their important status in society.
    Great post. Hope our govt. understands that governing the country doesn't mean interfering in people's personal lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many eminent historians like Romila Thapar and D N Jha have shown that meat was a common food even among the elite in ancient India. Practices change due to various circumstances, as you have also pointed out.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...