Skip to main content

The Real Enemies of India


People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it?

Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History, John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the British ever set foot on the country’s soil.  Keay says, “As Maulana Muhammad Ali would later put it, ‘We (Indians) divide and you (the British) rule.’  Without recognising, exploring and accommodating such division, British dominion in India would have been impossible to establish, let alone sustain.  Provoking sectarian conflict, on the other hand, was rarely in the British interest.”

The first reaction I anticipate from hardcore ‘patriots’ of contemporary India is that I have used a British writer’s view.  Well, my answer is: forget the nationality of the writer and see whether what he says is right.  Put aside emotions and sentiments and make use of plain rationality and objective facts.  Did the British actually divide us or did we divide ourselves?  It was not only religion that we used for erecting huge walls of separation among ourselves but also the caste system and its subsidiary systems.  The British made effective use of those divisions.

Secondly, no government would be foolish to encourage fissiparous tendencies among its people since they would only create more problems than solutions for any ruler.  It is interesting that the present government in India, led by the BJP, thinks otherwise.  It is encouraging antagonistic confrontations between the various religious communities for gaining certain political mileage.  Anyone with any vision beyond the tip of his/her nose would understand the folly as well as the danger that underlies the approach.

Suchitra Vijayan’s article in today’s Hindu, Rewriting the nation state, summarises succinctly the strategies used by the BJP and its allies to foment divisiveness in the country.  Let me extract the list from the concluding paragraph of her article:

 
Courtesy Economic Times
1.     Violence manufactured through riots
2.     Destruction of religious sites such as churches
3.     Organising religious conversion camps
4.     Beef bans
5.     Rewriting textbooks
6.     Censoring works of history, literature and fiction that challenge the ‘Hindu’ version of history
7.     Appropriating political icons
8.     Raising monuments

It would be interesting if the ‘patriots’ would sit up and reflect whether the British ever made use of such strategies.  What I’m trying to suggest is that we, some citizens of the independent India in the 21st century, are doing much more harm to the integrity of the nation than the British ever did.  Is this the India we really want?  Who are our real enemies?


Comments

  1. Sad.
    India has many enemies-
    Honest officers are killed, 70 year old nuns are disrespected... list goes on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's much that makes us hang our head in shame. I'd really wish our PM started being a little sincere.

      Delete
  2. We're really doing much more harms to our country than the British ever did! The list is endless and disturbing....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shameful, Maniparna. Yet we will keep accusing others for much lesser faults! Such a conceited nation of people we are.

      Delete
  3. This present India, is a creation of congress, and is only 71 yrs old. The process of oppressing cultural identities is not yet complete. Though the Indian press, and Hindi movies are diligently dedicated to the cause.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Congress doings dwindle into insignificance in comparison with the BJP ones. Mr Modi has every right to pat his own back.

    ReplyDelete
  5. After Ashoka, no other king ruled the entire India. Mughals did not venture into south and east India.

    British unified India for ease of administration and not to help us Indians in any way. It is Gandhi, Nehru and Patel who were creators of "India" we have today.

    India's integrity is questioned times and again. Many doubted it like Salman Rushdie in Midnight's children and Kushwant Singh in End of India. But India has emerged out stronger. Thanks to Bollywood and Cricket. Religion is not able to get there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm also pretty sure that India will outlive the present games and tendencies. There's something more than Bollywood and Cricket that unifies India. Otherwise, the country would have already shown signs of disintegration. There is a spirit that Indians have imbibed. Our politicians seem to be unaware of that spirit.

      Delete
  6. May be because of that we were called as 'white man's burden'. Few foolish people driving whole nation crazy!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such elements are always in a minority, Roohi. Yet they manage to get policies made, histories altered, masses swayed... That's the pity, it has always been. We can keep on questioning so that their impact is minimised as far as possible.

      Delete
  7. Very well said Tomichan. You have perhaps touched the tip of the iceberg. Apart from political parties, there are myriad reasons why there's no unity. Let alone India, there's no unity in a family these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree the problem is complex. Yet making disunity a national policy is extremely disastrous.

      Delete
  8. First of all I have a different perception to the point raised, however (in a cautious note) I neither have any inclination towards right wing politics nor their ideology. Political unification started in the very early times, disintegrated often and achieved its so called maturity during the British era. But a close look at the same proves that the unification is not perfect, but a ruined one. It was the Curzon policy which was behind the separation of Pakistan and Bangladesh from India. If it could be accepted as political unification, then this theory is applicable to the majority of the nations in the world which were under the control of the European powers. So I don't accept this theory.Even before British era, there existed a cultural unity within India. Recently there was a hypothesis by an Archeologists that Dravidians could have lived in Harappa. Check out our genes, it will show that we belong to the same ancestors and race irrespective of religion we practice.

    Coming to the BJP politics, I would say they are going behind their ideology and there is nothing much to be hyped. The same was forecast by leftists and other neutral leaders. Party with religious ideology follows the same tactics through out the world irrespective of religion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religion need not necessarily be divisive. In fact it turns divisive when politics joins it. It turns into a mere political tool. This way a terrible injustice is done to both religion and politics.

      The integrity of India will outlive the current political games. Indians are not fools.

      My mention of the British was meant for making a contrast only.

      Delete
  9. The only problem is we can't use logic. We use emotions to exploit people and we are emotional fools who end up getting used by others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Man is really not a Rational animal; most people don't display any sign of being rational.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Missing Women of Dharmasthala

The entrance to the temple Dharmasthala:  The Shadows Behind the Sanctum Ananya Bhatt, a young medical student from Manipal, visited the Dharmasthala Temple and she never returned to her hostel. She vanished without a trace. That was in 2003. Her mother, Sujata Bhatt, a stenographer working with the CBI, rushed to the temple town in search of her daughter. Some residents told her that they had seen Ananya walking with the temple officials. The local police refused to help in any way. Soon Sujata was abducted by three men, assaulted, and rendered unconscious. She woke up months later in a hospital in Bangalore (Bengaluru). Now more than two decades later, she is back in the temple premises to find her daughter’s remains and perform her last rites. Because a former sanitation worker of the temple came to the local court a few days back with a human skeleton and the confession that he had buried countless schoolgirls in uniform and other young women in the temple premises. This ma...

Two Nuns and two questions

The nuns kept in custody  Two Catholic nuns were arrested on 25 July 2025 at Durg railway station for allegedly trafficking tribal women from Narayanpur in Chhattisgarh to Agra in UP. Today’s newspapers in Kerala have expressed their contempt of the act more vehemently than I had expected. It seems secularism has hope yet in this country. For those who are not aware of the incident, two nuns were arrested because some criminals of a depraved organisation called Bajrang Dal in Chhattisgarh chose to conclude that the nuns were committing the crime of human-trafficking. Since that charge wouldn’t stick, because the women confessed that they were going voluntarily to take up jobs with the help of the nuns in order to raise their families from miserable poverty in a country that claims to be a $5-tillion-economy, another charge was fabricated that the nuns had indulged in religious conversion. Now let us look at certain facts. Though I keep questioning the Christian churches for...

Capital Punishment is not Revenge

Govindachamy when Kerala High Court confirmed his death sentence The Bible suggests that it is better for one man to die if that death helps others to live better [ John 11: 50 ]. Forgive me for applying that to a criminal today, though Jesus made that statement in a benign theological context. A notorious and hardcore criminal has escaped prison in Kerala. Fourteen years ago he assaulted a young girl who was travelling all alone in a late evening train, going back home from her workplace. The girl jumped out of the running train to save herself from this beast. But he jumped after her and raped her. The postmortem report suggested that he raped her twice, the second being when she had already fallen unconscious. And then he killed her hitting her head with a stone. Do you think that creature is human? I wrote about this back then: A Drop of Tear For You, Soumya . The people of Kerala demanded capital punishment for this creature, the brute called Govindachamy. He is inhu...

Gods, Guns and Missionaries

Book Review Title: Gods, Guns and Missionaries: The Making of the Modern Hindu Identity Author: Manu S Pillai Publisher: Penguin Random House India, 2024 Pages: 564 (about half of which consists of Notes) There never was any monolithic religion called Hinduism. Different parts of India practised Hinduism in its own ways, with its own gods and rituals and festivals. Some of these were even mutually opposed. For example, Vamana who is a revered incarnation of Vishnu in North India becomes a villain in Kerala’s Onam legends. What has become of this protean religion of infinite variety and diversity today in the hands of its ‘missionary’ political leaders? Manu S Pillai’s book ends with V D Savarkar’s contributions to the religion with a subtle hint that it is his legacy that is driving the present version of the religion in the name of Hindutva. The last lines of the book, leaving aside the Epilogue titled ‘What is Hinduism?’, are telltale. “Life did not give Savarkar all he...