Skip to main content

Religion, Politics and Truth


Dhaka killed Avijit Roy because he encouraged people to think for themselves, think freely and rationally.  Saudi Arabia is threatening to kill Raif Badawi, another blogger who, like Avijit Roy, used his rational faculty to analyse and understand his religion as well as his life.

Roy and Badawi are just two examples of people who are martyred for being rational and sane.  For the crime of thinking freely and honestly.

Badawi was originally sentenced to a decade in prison and 1000 lashes on the charge that he insulted Islam.  Now the charge has been modified as “renouncing Islam” the punishment for which is execution. 

Why can’t a person question his religion?  Why can’t he give up his religion if he finds it unsuitable for him? 

The most terrible irony is that we live in a world driven by science and technology but our sentiments are still mortgaged to antique belief systems.  Why do people find it difficult to break themselves free from the shackles of obscure and obsolete beliefs and rituals?

Perhaps, it’s not at all about beliefs and rituals.  Perhaps, it’s all about politics and power.  We should not forget the strong relationship that existed between Saudi Arabia and the United States of America: one an ultraconservative Islamic absolute monarchy, and the other a secular, democratic republic.  True, of late there have been some differences between the two countries.  Yet for years they cooperated with each other for achieving various political objectives, though religion-wise they were radically opposed to each other.

If religion can be sidelined for the sake of political objectives, why can’t rational and sane questions against it be tolerated?  The answer is obvious: what the religious leaders are interested in is not the truth but political power.   Politics and religion have been handmaidens to each other throughout the history of mankind.  We find the current Indian politics too trying to make use of religion for ignoble political purposes.


Comments

  1. All that madness is to gain power.. But why don't these power hungry people fail to acknowledge the fragility of life.. If nobody can become immortal then what is the extent of power they are seeking? The only answer to it - such people are just ignorant fools.. that explains the state of the world today..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roohi, do they have a heart? Every power-hungry person is blinded with his passion. It's a kind of madness, as you say yourself.

      Delete
  2. People at times just fail to understand how much politics interferes in religious matters and then such people continue to do stupid things under the pretext of religion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we can classify people into two categories: (1) they understand everything but are wicked or insane; and (2) the stupid people who think religion is the truth or who blindly follow anyone who claims to bring them religious truths.

      Delete
  3. You raise some very valid questions but sadly, there are no answers to these.

    As far as USA is concerned, even though its constitutionally secular, I find it's politics and judiciary riddled with religion, even more than India. Republicans are proudly Christians first, find separation of the Church and government abhorrent and find it completely to sane to say that God asked them to run for Presidency !
    Also, the relations between USA and Saudi were totally selfish and for oil. Religion had nothing to do with it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. America is a bundle of contradictions and paradoxes. They are staunch supporters and users of science and technology but there are hardcore religious fundamentalists (Christians) among them. They can support democracy or dictatorship as required by expediency. They let all sorts of people into their country and then practise racism!

      India is more tolerant, perhaps, when compared with that. But the fundamentalist elements are on the rise. It's not only the RSS and its Bhagwat; there are quite many people who have become blind with religious passions these days in India. Let's also not forget the Aseemanands and Pragya Thakus of yesterday who are now languishing in prisons but have spoken on record about the roles played by even Narendra Modi in spreading communal hatred in the country.

      Delete
  4. Very good post. It is sad that power makes people blind and they can push back seemingly conflicting matters like religion. However same entities cannot bear opposition or questioning of same religion that they opportunistically push back. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. History has enough lessons to show that religion was used for political purposes and not at all for spiritual purposes by people who had political ambitions. The problem is when some of the followers of such people perceive contradictions. For example, there might have been some RSS members who wished really to make India a Hindu Rashtra and hence voted for Modi. But now Modi is playing a different tune because he has got what he wanted (the PM's chair and not a Hindu Rashtra!).

      Delete
  5. Religion grows by feeding off the fear in people. Concepts like hell, apostasy, curses are all designed to make people cower in silence before the 'almighty'. Politicians use this fear to gain power. Unless people come out of this God-delusion, there is no stopping politicians taking advantage of people's fear of god.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. God Delusion. I'm reminded of Richard Dawkins. Yes, religion is a delusion. God is the super drug. Our present leaders and their cronies are peddling that drug generously. The tragedy is not that peddling but how the people are being hoodwinked increasingly by it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let