Skip to main content

Religion, Politics and Truth


Dhaka killed Avijit Roy because he encouraged people to think for themselves, think freely and rationally.  Saudi Arabia is threatening to kill Raif Badawi, another blogger who, like Avijit Roy, used his rational faculty to analyse and understand his religion as well as his life.

Roy and Badawi are just two examples of people who are martyred for being rational and sane.  For the crime of thinking freely and honestly.

Badawi was originally sentenced to a decade in prison and 1000 lashes on the charge that he insulted Islam.  Now the charge has been modified as “renouncing Islam” the punishment for which is execution. 

Why can’t a person question his religion?  Why can’t he give up his religion if he finds it unsuitable for him? 

The most terrible irony is that we live in a world driven by science and technology but our sentiments are still mortgaged to antique belief systems.  Why do people find it difficult to break themselves free from the shackles of obscure and obsolete beliefs and rituals?

Perhaps, it’s not at all about beliefs and rituals.  Perhaps, it’s all about politics and power.  We should not forget the strong relationship that existed between Saudi Arabia and the United States of America: one an ultraconservative Islamic absolute monarchy, and the other a secular, democratic republic.  True, of late there have been some differences between the two countries.  Yet for years they cooperated with each other for achieving various political objectives, though religion-wise they were radically opposed to each other.

If religion can be sidelined for the sake of political objectives, why can’t rational and sane questions against it be tolerated?  The answer is obvious: what the religious leaders are interested in is not the truth but political power.   Politics and religion have been handmaidens to each other throughout the history of mankind.  We find the current Indian politics too trying to make use of religion for ignoble political purposes.


Comments

  1. All that madness is to gain power.. But why don't these power hungry people fail to acknowledge the fragility of life.. If nobody can become immortal then what is the extent of power they are seeking? The only answer to it - such people are just ignorant fools.. that explains the state of the world today..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roohi, do they have a heart? Every power-hungry person is blinded with his passion. It's a kind of madness, as you say yourself.

      Delete
  2. People at times just fail to understand how much politics interferes in religious matters and then such people continue to do stupid things under the pretext of religion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we can classify people into two categories: (1) they understand everything but are wicked or insane; and (2) the stupid people who think religion is the truth or who blindly follow anyone who claims to bring them religious truths.

      Delete
  3. You raise some very valid questions but sadly, there are no answers to these.

    As far as USA is concerned, even though its constitutionally secular, I find it's politics and judiciary riddled with religion, even more than India. Republicans are proudly Christians first, find separation of the Church and government abhorrent and find it completely to sane to say that God asked them to run for Presidency !
    Also, the relations between USA and Saudi were totally selfish and for oil. Religion had nothing to do with it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. America is a bundle of contradictions and paradoxes. They are staunch supporters and users of science and technology but there are hardcore religious fundamentalists (Christians) among them. They can support democracy or dictatorship as required by expediency. They let all sorts of people into their country and then practise racism!

      India is more tolerant, perhaps, when compared with that. But the fundamentalist elements are on the rise. It's not only the RSS and its Bhagwat; there are quite many people who have become blind with religious passions these days in India. Let's also not forget the Aseemanands and Pragya Thakus of yesterday who are now languishing in prisons but have spoken on record about the roles played by even Narendra Modi in spreading communal hatred in the country.

      Delete
  4. Very good post. It is sad that power makes people blind and they can push back seemingly conflicting matters like religion. However same entities cannot bear opposition or questioning of same religion that they opportunistically push back. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. History has enough lessons to show that religion was used for political purposes and not at all for spiritual purposes by people who had political ambitions. The problem is when some of the followers of such people perceive contradictions. For example, there might have been some RSS members who wished really to make India a Hindu Rashtra and hence voted for Modi. But now Modi is playing a different tune because he has got what he wanted (the PM's chair and not a Hindu Rashtra!).

      Delete
  5. Religion grows by feeding off the fear in people. Concepts like hell, apostasy, curses are all designed to make people cower in silence before the 'almighty'. Politicians use this fear to gain power. Unless people come out of this God-delusion, there is no stopping politicians taking advantage of people's fear of god.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. God Delusion. I'm reminded of Richard Dawkins. Yes, religion is a delusion. God is the super drug. Our present leaders and their cronies are peddling that drug generously. The tragedy is not that peddling but how the people are being hoodwinked increasingly by it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...