Skip to main content

Religion in a murder mystery

 

First edition of the novel, 1887
From Wikipedia

The first Sherlock Holmes novel, A Study in Scarlet, has a religion at its centre: Mormonism. A wealthy American Enoch Drebber and his secretary Joseph Stangerson are both murdered in quick succession in London. Sherlock Holmes soon identifies the murderer Jefferson Hope. The murders were acts of revenge. Drebber and Stangerson had caused the untimely death of Lucy Ferrier whom Hope was to marry. They had also killed Lucy’s father, John.

Both Drebber and Stangerson are top leaders of the Mormon religion followed by all the settlers in Salt Lake City. John Ferrier was not a Mormon but lived like one because he had no choice. He detested certain practices of the religious sect like polygamy and the authoritarianism of the religious leaders called prophets. Both Drebber and Stangerson wish to marry Lucy though they already have many wives. John and Lucy run away from the place with Jefferson’s help. They were being guarded heavily and so the escape was a tough job indeed.

They don’t make it, however. They are overtaken, John is killed and Lucy is taken away by force while Jefferson is on a quest for food. All early efforts by the young Jefferson to wreak vengeance fail. But his fury does not subside. It takes him 20 years to overtake his enemies and kill them in London.

The novel is divided into two parts. The entire second part, titled The Country of the Saints, is about the exodus of the Mormons under the leadership of Brigham Young to the “arid and repulsive desert” that eventually became Salt Lake City. The starving John Ferrier and little Lucy are rescued by these Mormon immigrants who demand absolute loyalty from the father and the daughter to their religion. Faced with possible death due to starvation, John agrees to all the terms conditions laid by the religious people.

Arthur Conan Doyle

Religion is quite a terrible thing. This is what we see in this section of the novel. God and spirituality are not the real purposes of religion. God and spirituality are only potent tools wielded by certain people who set themselves up as the leaders. These leaders use God and rituals to impose their will on other people. When Lucy grows up she cannot even choose her own husband. The religious leaders will make even such personal choices for you.

Religion may impose a lot of things on you. Your dress, your food, your spouse, anything can be imposed on you by a couple of people who claim to be God’s representatives. This is what Arthur Conan Doyle shows us in the second part of his first detective novel.

The Mormons were not quite chuffed with the novel when it was published. But the author stuck to what he wrote and even claimed historicity for many of the events in the novel like the founding of Salt Lake City, practice of polygamy, and the rigidity of rules. People who questioned the leaders just disappeared. Some were killed brutally.

Certain things happening in my country now, under the leadership of so-called religious people, reminded me of Conan Doyle’s Mormons.

Comments

  1. Conan Doyle was (and is) right. Anything can be imposed on us by some who claim to be God’s representatives, very true. Like Conan Doyle, George Orwell was also a foresighted person who visualized well in advance in his novels like '1984' and 'Animal Farm' what we are witnessing now-a-days.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...