Skip to main content

Make religion potent

 

Jimmy Swaggart, American Evangelist

Wikipedia estimates that there are about 4200 religions in the world. Religion dates back to 4500 BCE. That is, human beings worshipped one god or another for some 6500 years. That’s pretty long period of time for any species not to be affected by an entity. Why does the human species remain as savage as it was in spite of all that worship, all those divine contacts, infinite hymns and rituals – seemingly utterly unaffected by that divinity?

Two years ago, Christian Today reported that the “ten happiest countries in the world are among the least religious”. The report which was based on a detailed study also mentioned that “the most unhappy countries in the world are also among the most religious”.

Isn’t there something seriously wrong? Gods are obviously doing no good – not anything worth mentioning at least – to humankind. On the contrary, they are doing much harm. Evil keeps mounting in direct proportion to the number of gods and religions. Yet the primary purpose of religion is to provide us with “a sense of peace, serenity, and loving-kindness,” according to a scholar of Semitic religions, Karen Armstrong. Religions seem to be producing just the opposite of what they are supposed to.

We cannot wish away religions and gods, however. They will continue to wield their powers as long as humankind exists. They do serve some practical purposes such as give meaning to an otherwise terrible life and promise what Karl Marx famously called “the pie in the sky”. It is easier to endure life if you believe in god(s) and the pie in the sky that awaits you as a reward for all your pain here.

No one would have any problem with gods and religions if they were only providing good things like spiritual meaning and psychological solace. The problem is they do a lot more harm than good. There is more strife than peace, more hate than love, more bleakness than inspiration, because of gods and religions. Probably more wars have been fought in the name of gods and religions than for anything else. Even Hitler’s devastating hate had a religious target like his contemporary Indian avatar’s has too.

What’s the solution to all this? I see only two viable solutions. One, anyone who misuses religion, anyone who does any serious crime in the name of religion, should be divorced from his religion and sent to a correction home where he or she should be educated or counselled or treated by professional psychiatrists. Religion that commits crimes is a mental disease.

Two, banish religion from public life altogether. Religion should be a personal affair. Of course, there may be temples and other places of worship if people find them useful in their spiritual quest. But they should remain private affairs of the concerned communities. Nothing about them should enter the public domain in the form of processions or rallies or speeches through loudspeakers… Give people the chance to let their religion touch their hearts instead of their solar plexuses.

But who will do all that? Our own leaders are sick people infected with perverse religiosity.

Indian version of an Evangelist


I have lived on this planet for over 60 years and have seen all sorts of religious people. I am ready to throw a challenge to anyone. Take any excessively religious person – one who does anything evil or even positively extreme in the name of his religion and god(s) – and subject him to psychoanalysis. The result will definitely be an autopsy of insanity of some degree or another. Every religious fanatic is a neurotic. Quite many are psychotics. Ready to take that challenge?

 

PS. Written for Indispire Edition 361: We have so many religions and gods. We have had them for millennia. Yet we as a species haven't learnt basics of spirituality. What's wrong? #SpiritualLag

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ghost of a Banyan Tree

  Image from here Fiction Jaichander Varma could not sleep. It was past midnight and the world outside Jaichander Varma’s room was fairly quiet because he lived sufficiently far away from the city. Though that entailed a tedious journey to his work and back, Mr Varma was happy with his residence because it afforded him the luxury of peaceful and pure air. The city is good, no doubt. Especially after Mr Modi became the Prime Minister, the city was the best place with so much vikas. ‘Where’s vikas?’ Someone asked Mr Varma once. Mr Varma was offended. ‘You’re a bloody antinational mussalman who should be living in Pakistan ya kabristan,’ Mr Varma told him bluntly. Mr Varma was a proud Indian which means he was a Hindu Brahmin. He believed that all others – that is, non-Brahmins – should go to their respective countries of belonging. All Muslims should go to Pakistan and Christians to Rome (or is it Italy? Whatever. Get out of Bharat Mata, that’s all.) The lower caste Hindus co...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Romance in Utopia

Book Review Title: My Haven Author: Ruchi Chandra Verma Pages: 161 T his little novel is a surfeit of sugar and honey. All the characters that matter are young employees of an IT firm in Bengaluru. One of them, Pihu, 23 years and all too sweet and soft, falls in love with her senior colleague, Aditya. The love is sweetly reciprocated too. The colleagues are all happy, furthermore. No jealousy, no rivalry, nothing that disturbs the utopian equilibrium that the author has created in the novel. What would love be like in a utopia? First of all, there would be no fear or insecurity. No fear of betrayal, jealousy, heartbreak… Emotional security is an essential part of any utopia. There would be complete trust between partners, without the need for games or power struggles. Every relationship would be built on deep understanding, where partners complement each other perfectly. Miscommunication and misunderstanding would be rare or non-existent, as people would have heightened emo...

Tanishq and the Patriots

Patriots are a queer lot. You don’t know what all things can make them pick up the gun. Only one thing is certain apparently: the gun for anything. When the neighbouring country behaves like a hoard of bandicoots digging into our national borders, we will naturally take up the gun. But nowadays we choose to redraw certain lines on the map and then proclaim that not an inch of land has been lost. On the other hand, when a jewellery company brings out an ad promoting harmony between the majority and the minority populations, our patriots take up the gun. And shoot down the ad. Those who promote communal harmony are traitors in India today. The sacred duty of the genuine Indian patriot is to hate certain communities, rape their women, plunder their land, deny them education and other fundamental rights and basic requirements. Tanishq withdrew the ad that sought to promote communal harmony. The patriot’s gun won. Aapka Bharat Mahan. In the novel Black Hole which I’m writing there is...

A Lesson from Little Prince

I joined the #WriteAPageADay challenge of Blogchatter , as I mentioned earlier in another post. I haven’t succeeded in writing a page every day, though. But as long as you manage to write a minimum of 10,000 words in the month of Feb, Blogchatter is contented. I woke up this morning feeling rather vacant in the head, which happens sometimes. Whenever that happens to me but I do want to get on with what I should, I fall back on a book that has inspired me. One such book is Antoine de Saint-Exupery’s The Little Prince . I have wished time and again to meet Little Prince in person as the narrator of his story did. We might have interesting conversations like the ones that exist in the novel. If a sheep eats shrubs, will he also eat flowers? That is one of the questions raised by Little Prince [LP]. “A sheep eats whatever he meets,” the narrator answers. “Even flowers that have thorns?” LP is interested in the rose he has on his tiny planet. When he is told that the sheep will eat f...