Skip to main content

Is liberal Muslim an oxymoron?


When I saw the cover story of the Frontline magazine dated 10 March 2023, my impulsive response was a snigger. The magazine sought to feature liberal Muslims. “Is there such a species as liberal Muslims?” That was my spontaneous thought. No sooner had that thought arisen in my mind than it was suppressed by a self-rebuke. “Has the present right wing propaganda made you a bigot too?” My consciousness rebuked me. That was a moment of epiphany for me. A revelation that my thinking had been distorted by the country’s leading discourse which is about the irredeemable bigotry of Muslims.

In the very first article, Hilal Ahmed, a professor in a Delhi institution of higher learning, defines a liberal Muslim as an individual who adheres to certain liberal egalitarian values without giving up her cultural and/or religious identity as a Muslim. A liberal, in general, is an individual who is not dogmatic in her religious, social and political views, in the definition of historian Irfan Habib, in the next article. A liberal is not only tolerant of others’ views but also respects those views.

Will we find very many liberal Muslims in the world by those definitions? I did wonder as I decided to read all the articles of Frontline’s cover story. The answer given by the Muslim writers (all related articles in this issue are written by Muslim writers) is interesting: it is difficult to be a liberal Muslim today. No wonder, why my impulse found the topic irresistibly tickling.

The blame is not placed conveniently on the Hindutva forces in India that make life harder than ever for the Indian Muslims. The writers take a hard look at their own religion too.

Hilal Ahmed questions the very relevance of the liberal Muslim in today’s India where the political framework fabricated by BJP has made all Muslims necessarily enemies of the country. A liberal traitor is an absurd notion indeed. If your place is Pakistan ya Kabristan, what does your liberalism mean at all?

Moreover, the majoritarian community tends to view liberalism among Muslims as a kind of communal conspiracy to establish Muslim supremacy over Hindus. The Muslim by nature is incapable of liberalism and if you come across a liberal Muslim he must be up to some political trick. That is the majoritarian understanding.

Another thought-provoking fact mentioned by Ahmed is that even if some liberal Muslims are accepted as authentic, they won’t get political patronage because any benevolent reference to Muslims in today’s India will adversely affect the Hindu majoritarian sentiments. If you want to survive politically in India today, you have to hate the Muslims – liberal or whatever.

Irfan Habib also underscores the simple truth that a liberal Muslim in India today is caught ‘on a knife’s edge’ [the title of his article]. A liberal Muslim is trapped between two inimical forces: his own community and the Hindutva forces.

Activist Zakia Soman also points a finger at her own community which makes it almost impossible for any member to swim against the common tide and live on their own terms. A liberal Muslim is not generally accepted within the community, she says. And the rise of Hindutva has made the situation worse. Your community won’t support you and your state won’t support you if you are a liberal. How is a liberal Muslim going to survive?

Zakia Soman’s article ends on a note of optimism. Sixty percent of Indians do not vote for Hindutva, she says. The majority are not right wing. It is a minority of people who have distorted the country’s mindset. There is hope yet.

A liberal Muslim need not be an oxymoron


Comments

  1. Hari OM
    An interesting read, for sure. It seems the world just now will not allow for folk just to get on in life without having to wear some sort of badge or declare an oath... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS - I trust your health is much improved! Yxx

      Delete
    2. Identity markers are becoming more conspicuous. It's not a good sign. But, on the other hand, introspection on the part of certain groups will do good to all.

      Yes, I'm much better now. Started going to school.

      Delete
  2. A classic issue in india where religion got allowed to play in politics. Hindus are non-dogmstic by their traditions, but then the very tradition was used by Semitic religions to decimate it and Hindithva, a dogmatic offspring of it found its feet on that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

Duryodhana Returns

Duryodhana was bored of his centuries-long exile in Mythland and decided to return to his former kingdom. Arnab Gau-Swami had declared Bihar the new Kurukshetra and so Duryodhana chose Bihar for his adventure. And Bihar did entertain him with its modern enactment of the Mahabharata. Alliances broke, cousins pulled down each other, kings switched sides without shame, and advisers looked like modern-day Shakunis with laptops. Duryodhana’s curiosity was more than piqued. There’s more masala here than in the old Hastinapura. He decided to make a deep study of this politics so that he could conclusively prove that he was not a villain but a misunderstood statesman ahead of his time. The first lesson he learns is that everyone should claim that they are the Pandavas, and portray everyone else as the Kauravas. Every party claims they stand for dharma, the people, and justice. And then plot to topple someone, eliminate someone else, distort history, fabricate expedient truths, manipulate...