Skip to main content

Is liberal Muslim an oxymoron?


When I saw the cover story of the Frontline magazine dated 10 March 2023, my impulsive response was a snigger. The magazine sought to feature liberal Muslims. “Is there such a species as liberal Muslims?” That was my spontaneous thought. No sooner had that thought arisen in my mind than it was suppressed by a self-rebuke. “Has the present right wing propaganda made you a bigot too?” My consciousness rebuked me. That was a moment of epiphany for me. A revelation that my thinking had been distorted by the country’s leading discourse which is about the irredeemable bigotry of Muslims.

In the very first article, Hilal Ahmed, a professor in a Delhi institution of higher learning, defines a liberal Muslim as an individual who adheres to certain liberal egalitarian values without giving up her cultural and/or religious identity as a Muslim. A liberal, in general, is an individual who is not dogmatic in her religious, social and political views, in the definition of historian Irfan Habib, in the next article. A liberal is not only tolerant of others’ views but also respects those views.

Will we find very many liberal Muslims in the world by those definitions? I did wonder as I decided to read all the articles of Frontline’s cover story. The answer given by the Muslim writers (all related articles in this issue are written by Muslim writers) is interesting: it is difficult to be a liberal Muslim today. No wonder, why my impulse found the topic irresistibly tickling.

The blame is not placed conveniently on the Hindutva forces in India that make life harder than ever for the Indian Muslims. The writers take a hard look at their own religion too.

Hilal Ahmed questions the very relevance of the liberal Muslim in today’s India where the political framework fabricated by BJP has made all Muslims necessarily enemies of the country. A liberal traitor is an absurd notion indeed. If your place is Pakistan ya Kabristan, what does your liberalism mean at all?

Moreover, the majoritarian community tends to view liberalism among Muslims as a kind of communal conspiracy to establish Muslim supremacy over Hindus. The Muslim by nature is incapable of liberalism and if you come across a liberal Muslim he must be up to some political trick. That is the majoritarian understanding.

Another thought-provoking fact mentioned by Ahmed is that even if some liberal Muslims are accepted as authentic, they won’t get political patronage because any benevolent reference to Muslims in today’s India will adversely affect the Hindu majoritarian sentiments. If you want to survive politically in India today, you have to hate the Muslims – liberal or whatever.

Irfan Habib also underscores the simple truth that a liberal Muslim in India today is caught ‘on a knife’s edge’ [the title of his article]. A liberal Muslim is trapped between two inimical forces: his own community and the Hindutva forces.

Activist Zakia Soman also points a finger at her own community which makes it almost impossible for any member to swim against the common tide and live on their own terms. A liberal Muslim is not generally accepted within the community, she says. And the rise of Hindutva has made the situation worse. Your community won’t support you and your state won’t support you if you are a liberal. How is a liberal Muslim going to survive?

Zakia Soman’s article ends on a note of optimism. Sixty percent of Indians do not vote for Hindutva, she says. The majority are not right wing. It is a minority of people who have distorted the country’s mindset. There is hope yet.

A liberal Muslim need not be an oxymoron


Comments

  1. Hari OM
    An interesting read, for sure. It seems the world just now will not allow for folk just to get on in life without having to wear some sort of badge or declare an oath... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS - I trust your health is much improved! Yxx

      Delete
    2. Identity markers are becoming more conspicuous. It's not a good sign. But, on the other hand, introspection on the part of certain groups will do good to all.

      Yes, I'm much better now. Started going to school.

      Delete
  2. A classic issue in india where religion got allowed to play in politics. Hindus are non-dogmstic by their traditions, but then the very tradition was used by Semitic religions to decimate it and Hindithva, a dogmatic offspring of it found its feet on that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Modi’s Art of Censorship

One of the infinite ironies about Narendra Modi’s India is its flagrant censorship while claiming to be the most tolerant civilisation. A Guardian report today informs us that Arundhati Roy’s 2020 book, Azadi , is banned in Kashmir for promoting a “false narrative and secessionism.” Being a fan of Ms Roy’s rebellious spirit, I buy her books as they are published. I had reviewed this book ( Azadi ) back in 2020 when it was published. The Congress government that ruled India for a very long period, before Modi’s rhetoric mesmerised the Indian electorate, was highly flawed. Corruption ran in its every single vein. Yet it was far better than what Modi brought in its place. The glaring hypocrisy of the Congress was a glue that held India together, Ms Roy says in this censored book of hers. What she means to say is that though secularism was not practised sincerely or consistently the pretence of it acted as a binding force that maintained a kind of social and political equilibrium. T...

Solzhenitsyn’s Many Disillusionments

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn died a sad and disillusioned man. Solzhenitsyn was a genuine socialist in the beginning. He fought for the Red Army in WWII. He was a committed Soviet patriot. Equality, justice, and dignity of the workers were his ideals, his dreams. However, Stalin became a brutal dictator and Solzhenitsyn became his vocal critic. As a result, Solzhenitsyn was arrested and sent to the Gulag: a network of inhuman labour camps. Hundreds of Russians were tortured and killed in those camps and Solzhenitsyn was disillusioned with socialism. The Russian Revolution was supposed to have liberated the common citizens from imperial oppressions. However, the new government under Stalin was far more ruthless, unjust, and oppressive than the empire. The socialist ideology became a kind of deity for which everything else was sacrificed, including truth. Writing the story of his life in the camp in The Gulag Archipelago , Solzhenitsyn warned that such systems coul...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...