Skip to main content

Modi’s Art of Censorship


One of the infinite ironies about Narendra Modi’s India is its flagrant censorship while claiming to be the most tolerant civilisation. A Guardian report today informs us that Arundhati Roy’s 2020 book, Azadi, is banned in Kashmir for promoting a “false narrative and secessionism.” Being a fan of Ms Roy’s rebellious spirit, I buy her books as they are published. I had reviewed this book (Azadi) back in 2020 when it was published.

The Congress government that ruled India for a very long period, before Modi’s rhetoric mesmerised the Indian electorate, was highly flawed. Corruption ran in its every single vein. Yet it was far better than what Modi brought in its place. The glaring hypocrisy of the Congress was a glue that held India together, Ms Roy says in this censored book of hers. What she means to say is that though secularism was not practised sincerely or consistently the pretence of it acted as a binding force that maintained a kind of social and political equilibrium. That ‘pseudo-secularism’, as Modi’s party labelled it, gave people from different religions and backgrounds a reason to believe in a common national project.

After Modi became the Prime Minister, Ms Roy argues, even that pretence was dropped. Secularism was replaced with overt majoritarianism which in essence was a rejection of the inclusive ideals enshrined in the Constitution. Now Modi & Co are all set to censor out the words ‘secular’ and ‘socialist’ from the Preamble to the Constitution. Ms Roy says in Azadi that “India has been neither secular nor socialist. In effect, it has always functioned as an upper-caste Hindu state. But the conceit of secularism, hypocritical though it may be, is the only shard of coherence that makes India possible. That hypocrisy was the best thing we had. Without it, India will end.” 

Today Modi’s India is hounding the Muslims and Christians. Ms Roy’s book says that “millions of India’s Muslims are the descendants of people who converted to Islam to escape Hinduism’s cruel practice of caste.” The truth is that most Christians in the North Indian states are also similar converts.

Islam and Christianity in India were largely reactions to the perversions of Hinduism. In pre-Modi years, the Brahminical system made life impossible for certain people who then escaped their bad fate by quitting their religion. In Modi-fied India, the same people are hounded day in and day out in the name of religion instead of caste. India wasn’t ever a bit as great as Modi makes it out to be in his eloquent speeches all over the world.

True, Hinduism has one of the most sublime philosophies in the world’s religions. Advaita, for example, towers above everything else that any religion could teach. The problem is that such notions remained in the books. In practice, Hinduism was a cruel religion that oppressed a lot of people in the name of caste and other such distinctions. Nehru’s leadership, which Modi keeps blaming every now and then, had its limitations; but it was humane to say the least. Modi’s leadership, on the other hand, is as brutal as Hitler’s.

As I am writing this, reports are coming in that some Christian priests and nuns were attacked in Odisha today by the hooligans of the Bajrang Dal, the rogue wing of the BJP. After Modi became the PM, more than 4000 similar attacks have taken place on Christians in the Hindi belt.

Who benefits out of these attacks? Ms Roy’s book, now censored in Kashmir, gives the answer. “Between 2016 and 2017, even as the world economy tanked, the BJP became one of the richest political parties in the world.” Today in 2025, Modi’s party is perhaps the only political party in the world that does not know how much money it has and where all that is stashed away. And where all those riches come from.

Ms Roy raises a lot of unsettling questions. No wonder her book has been censored. But hers is not the only one to suffer that fate in Kashmir: 25 books have been made to vanish from what now is a central government’s colony.

Can we imagine a better India? That is the last question in Azadi.

Comments

  1. Fascism thrives on Obfuscations and Post-truth and construction of Alternative Facts. And clinically orchestrated Polarization. I am awaiting a People's Movement.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Are human systems repressive?

Salma I had never heard of Salma until she was sent to the Rajya Sabha as a Member of the Parliament by Tamil Nadu a couple of weeks back and a Malayalam weekly featured her on the cover with an interview. Salma’s story made me think on the nature of certain human systems and organisations including religion. Salma was born Rajathi Samsudeen. Marriage made her Rukiya, because her husband’s family didn’t think of Rajathi as a Muslim name. Salma is the pseudonym she chose as a writer. Salma’s life was always controlled by one system or another. Her religion and its ruthlessly patriarchal conventions determined the crests and troughs of her life’s waves. Her schooling ended the day she chose to watch a movie with a friend, another girl whose education was stopped too. They were in class 9. When Rajathi protested that her cousin, a boy, was also watching the same movie at the same time in the same cinema hall, her mother’s answer was, “He’s a boy; boys can do anything.” Rajathi was...

Roles we Play

When I saw the above picture of Narendra Modi in the latest issue of India Today , what rushed to my mind instantly was a Malayalam film song Veshangal Janmangal … Life is a series of roles dressed up for the occasion. There are different costumes for celebrations and mourning, and there are people who can shed one and move into the other instantly. Are your smiles genuine? Do your tears mean sadness? Or, are they all costumes that suit the occasion? Are you just an actor who plays certain roles? Is the entire cosmos just a gigantic theatre for you? Where can we find the real you beneath all the costumes you keep changing day in and day out? Have you relinquished dharma in favour of cravings? Truth over expediency?