Skip to main content

Judiciary as Government’s Handmaid

Image from Mathrubhumi (Malayalam weekly) 2 April 2023


The media in India became the central government’s lapdog long ago, with a few exceptions. Democracy bleeds when that happens. And democracy dies when the judiciary becomes the government’s handmaid. It is impossible for the citizens to get justice when the judiciary becomes a tool in the hands of the government. Anyone can be arrested for any reason. As it happened, for example, with the Kannada actor Chetan Kumar a few days back. He was arrested for tweeting that “Hindutva is built on LIES.” He mentioned a few lies too, like: 1992: Babri Masjid is ‘birthplace of Rama’ —> a lie. A few days after his arrest and remand to judicial custody, Rahul Gandhi was arrested for saying rather facetiously that too many Modis are thieves.

Truth is a crime now. Humour is a crime too.

A lot of our parliamentarians are hardcore criminals. There are murderers and rapists among them. There are swindlers and kidnappers. They continue to be our legislators while Chetan Kumar and Rahul Gandhi will be in jail for telling truths or jokes.

There is something far worse than this that is afoot, something that is corroding the very heart of India’s secular democracy. The country is insidiously being converted into a Hindu Rashtra using the judiciary.

In order to make the country a Hindu Rashtra, there are three possible ways. One, change the Constitution. If the BJP wins two-thirds majority in the next general elections (which is not impossible), the existing Constitution can be dumped and a new Constitution that declares the country as a Hindu Rashtra can be adopted.

Two, amend the existing Constitution. Make some changes so that Indian secularism becomes something similar to what the Pakistani Constitution claims: to protect the citizens of other faiths in the light of Islam’s creeds and doctrines. Instead of Islam, it will be Hindutva in India. The Constitution may call it Sanatan Dharma. Once this happens, criticising Hindu religion, gods, scriptures, etc will become a crime and gradually the non-Hindus can all be thrown behind the bars for telling jokes or praying to different gods or whatever.

Three, which is more likely to happen, interpret the existing Constitution as a Hindu document using the judiciary. This is already happening. Take a couple of examples.

The Ayodhya verdict says, among a lot of other contentious claims, that “Evidences support the faith and belief of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born where the Babri mosque was constructed. The conclusion that the place of birth of Lord Ram is the three domes can therefore be reached.”

The Hindu faith becomes the basis of the verdict. Similarly Hindu scriptures or conventions or practices or just anything can become the foundation of justice. That would mean that anyone can be proclaimed guilty somehow or the other. There is no justice, in other words. There is only religion. Rather, there is only politics.

This is happening. Chetan Kumar and Rahul Gandhi are just two recent examples.

In the verdict regarding the Hijab issue, there are explicit suggestions that Hinduism is the eternal law (Sanatan Dharma) unlike Islam or other religions. That is, it becomes the duty of every Indian to accept the tenets of Hinduism as eternal truths or moral codes. Justice Hemant Gupta of the Hijab case stated that “When dharma is used in the context of the state, it means constitutional law.” He added that “Dharmarajya is necessary for the peace and prosperity of the people and for the establishment of an egalitarian society.”

When the judiciary becomes so ‘religious’ and politically motivated, the death of secularism is a foregone conclusion.

The Hijab verdict went on to say that “The word ‘religion’ in articles 25 and 26 has to be understood not in a narrow sense but encompassing our ethos ‘Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah’.” [Emphasis added]

Who are included in that pronoun ‘our’? Obviously not the Muslims of India. Implicitly not anyone belonging to religions other than Hinduism. Not even the Dalits, in practice.

Now, think. Isn’t India becoming a Hindu Rashtra? Hasn’t it already become one for most practical purposes?

Jai Hind!

PS. Politics has begun to be so detestable in this country that I want to stop writing about it. This post is in response to the latest IndiSpire prompt: Has Indian judiciary become a courtier of the government? #EnslavedJudiciary

 

 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Yamini MacLeanMarch 28, 2023 at 9:36 PM

    Hari OM
    I too find myself intensely dismayed at the falling away of true democracy, only to find in its place "sham-ocracy". Such heinous misuse of India's own deep culture, a culture so much the richer for all the facets within it. How can the brutes in charge not see how they damage their jewel, this diamond..??? YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMarch 29, 2023 at 7:04 AM

      The greatest injustice done by the present leadership is precisely this perversion of the country's ethos, its great values and principles. It will demand nothing short of a Messiah now for redemption.

      Delete
  2. जितेन्द्र माथुरMarch 29, 2023 at 12:49 PM

    I fully agree to the thoughts expressed herein. India, for all practical purposes, has become a Hindu Rashtra (with the shamelessly bald help of the Indian judiciary). Redemption is a remote possibility now. We can only hope against hope that the things will improve in the times to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMarch 29, 2023 at 12:58 PM

      It will take years to change any culture. The more perverted, the longer it will take. So we can only hope against hope!

      Delete
  3. A Hundred QuillsMarch 30, 2023 at 6:19 AM

    We are certainly in a precarious democratic situation at the moment. We live in times when every word we say can be taken out of context with far reaching consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CareenaMarch 30, 2023 at 7:46 PM

    I think about publishing opinions like these only to be discouraged by my parents. Because it's true, anyone can be jailed. This govt has succeeded to instill that fear. It's a slow painful death for our democracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMarch 30, 2023 at 7:56 PM

      It is indeed dangerous to articulate opinions these days. I presume I'm not famous enough to be bothered about.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...
16 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
19 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more

Mother Mary Comes to Me

Book Review In one of the first pages of this book, the author cautions us to “read this book as you would a novel.” No one can remember the events of their lives accurately. Roy says that “most of us are a living, breathing soup of memory and imagination … and we may not be the best arbiters of which is which.” What you remember may not be what happened exactly. As we get on with the painful process called life, we keep rewriting our own narratives. The book does read like a novel. Not because Roy has fictionalised her and her mother’s lives. The characters of these two women are extremely complex, that’s why. Then there is Roy’s style which transmutes everything including anger and despair into lyrical poetry. There’s a lot of pain and sadness in this book. The way Roy narrates all that makes it quite a classic in the genre of memoirs. The book is not so much about Roy’s mother Mary as about that mother’s impact on the daughter’s very being. Arundhati was born in the undivided ...
14 comments
Read more