Skip to main content

Judiciary as Government’s Handmaid

Image from Mathrubhumi (Malayalam weekly) 2 April 2023


The media in India became the central government’s lapdog long ago, with a few exceptions. Democracy bleeds when that happens. And democracy dies when the judiciary becomes the government’s handmaid. It is impossible for the citizens to get justice when the judiciary becomes a tool in the hands of the government. Anyone can be arrested for any reason. As it happened, for example, with the Kannada actor Chetan Kumar a few days back. He was arrested for tweeting that “Hindutva is built on LIES.” He mentioned a few lies too, like: 1992: Babri Masjid is ‘birthplace of Rama’ —> a lie. A few days after his arrest and remand to judicial custody, Rahul Gandhi was arrested for saying rather facetiously that too many Modis are thieves.

Truth is a crime now. Humour is a crime too.

A lot of our parliamentarians are hardcore criminals. There are murderers and rapists among them. There are swindlers and kidnappers. They continue to be our legislators while Chetan Kumar and Rahul Gandhi will be in jail for telling truths or jokes.

There is something far worse than this that is afoot, something that is corroding the very heart of India’s secular democracy. The country is insidiously being converted into a Hindu Rashtra using the judiciary.

In order to make the country a Hindu Rashtra, there are three possible ways. One, change the Constitution. If the BJP wins two-thirds majority in the next general elections (which is not impossible), the existing Constitution can be dumped and a new Constitution that declares the country as a Hindu Rashtra can be adopted.

Two, amend the existing Constitution. Make some changes so that Indian secularism becomes something similar to what the Pakistani Constitution claims: to protect the citizens of other faiths in the light of Islam’s creeds and doctrines. Instead of Islam, it will be Hindutva in India. The Constitution may call it Sanatan Dharma. Once this happens, criticising Hindu religion, gods, scriptures, etc will become a crime and gradually the non-Hindus can all be thrown behind the bars for telling jokes or praying to different gods or whatever.

Three, which is more likely to happen, interpret the existing Constitution as a Hindu document using the judiciary. This is already happening. Take a couple of examples.

The Ayodhya verdict says, among a lot of other contentious claims, that “Evidences support the faith and belief of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born where the Babri mosque was constructed. The conclusion that the place of birth of Lord Ram is the three domes can therefore be reached.”

The Hindu faith becomes the basis of the verdict. Similarly Hindu scriptures or conventions or practices or just anything can become the foundation of justice. That would mean that anyone can be proclaimed guilty somehow or the other. There is no justice, in other words. There is only religion. Rather, there is only politics.

This is happening. Chetan Kumar and Rahul Gandhi are just two recent examples.

In the verdict regarding the Hijab issue, there are explicit suggestions that Hinduism is the eternal law (Sanatan Dharma) unlike Islam or other religions. That is, it becomes the duty of every Indian to accept the tenets of Hinduism as eternal truths or moral codes. Justice Hemant Gupta of the Hijab case stated that “When dharma is used in the context of the state, it means constitutional law.” He added that “Dharmarajya is necessary for the peace and prosperity of the people and for the establishment of an egalitarian society.”

When the judiciary becomes so ‘religious’ and politically motivated, the death of secularism is a foregone conclusion.

The Hijab verdict went on to say that “The word ‘religion’ in articles 25 and 26 has to be understood not in a narrow sense but encompassing our ethos ‘Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah’.” [Emphasis added]

Who are included in that pronoun ‘our’? Obviously not the Muslims of India. Implicitly not anyone belonging to religions other than Hinduism. Not even the Dalits, in practice.

Now, think. Isn’t India becoming a Hindu Rashtra? Hasn’t it already become one for most practical purposes?

Jai Hind!

PS. Politics has begun to be so detestable in this country that I want to stop writing about it. This post is in response to the latest IndiSpire prompt: Has Indian judiciary become a courtier of the government? #EnslavedJudiciary

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    I too find myself intensely dismayed at the falling away of true democracy, only to find in its place "sham-ocracy". Such heinous misuse of India's own deep culture, a culture so much the richer for all the facets within it. How can the brutes in charge not see how they damage their jewel, this diamond..??? YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The greatest injustice done by the present leadership is precisely this perversion of the country's ethos, its great values and principles. It will demand nothing short of a Messiah now for redemption.

      Delete
  2. I fully agree to the thoughts expressed herein. India, for all practical purposes, has become a Hindu Rashtra (with the shamelessly bald help of the Indian judiciary). Redemption is a remote possibility now. We can only hope against hope that the things will improve in the times to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will take years to change any culture. The more perverted, the longer it will take. So we can only hope against hope!

      Delete
  3. We are certainly in a precarious democratic situation at the moment. We live in times when every word we say can be taken out of context with far reaching consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think about publishing opinions like these only to be discouraged by my parents. Because it's true, anyone can be jailed. This govt has succeeded to instill that fear. It's a slow painful death for our democracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is indeed dangerous to articulate opinions these days. I presume I'm not famous enough to be bothered about.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r