Skip to main content

Human Irrationality

Book Review

Title: The Upside of Irrationality

Author: Dan Ariely

Publisher: Thorsons – HarperCollins, London, 2010

Pages: 334

Ever since my youth, I have questioned the definition of human as a rational being. If humans were rational, the world would have been a kind of utopia. Just imagine everyone thinking rationally. There would be no crimes simply because crime is the most irrational deed one can do. The only drawback of that sort of a world would be that it might be a bit boring.

It is since irrationality has fascinated me forever that I bought this book, The Upside of Irrationality, by Dan Ariely. I wanted to learn more interesting facts about human irrationality. But, unfortunately, this book has little to offer. It tells us what we already know.

The book is divided into two parts. Part 1 deals with irrationality at our workplaces and part 2 with irrationality at home. Workplace and home are the two places where we spend most of our time. Our irrationality will be most visible there, no doubt. However, we don’t need an international bestselling author on psychology to tell us that our work will be a burden unless we are able to discover a meaning and purpose in it [chapter 2] or that we tend to overvalue what we make ourselves [chapters 3 & 4]. An entire chapter [5] is devoted to tell us how an apology can ease most painful situations and prevent the engendering of vindictive feelings in others.

The most banal counsel provided by the author, I think, comes in chapter 6 where he teaches us about human adaptation. Humans adapt all too easily to any situation, even to our pay levels – high or low. Even to our homes. The initial delight over the tiles and built-in furniture as well as the annoyance with the unpleasant kitchen settings will all give way to casual acceptance and getting on. The worst is when the author tells us how to adapt when the financial going gets bad: cut down on your expenses, especially alcohol. You don’t need an international bestseller to tell you that, do you?

What if the mate you are looking for is not as handsome/beautiful as you had dreamt of? Which option will you choose?

1.     alter your perception of aesthetics – I like bald men [you hated them so far]

2.     reconsider the rank of attribution – I don’t like bald men, but I look at other things.

3.     don’t adapt – I’ll never like bald men.

If you don’t know which option is right, you will find this book useful.

This is not to say that the book is not worth reading. Maybe, I have read too much of this type and there is little new to add. Psychology hasn’t grown much beyond what your grandmother taught you with her accumulated wisdom.

I liked the last chapter [11] which speaks about the lessons from our irrationalities. “If we learn to question ourselves and test our beliefs, we might actually discover when and how we are wrong and improve the ways we love, live, work, innovate, manage, and govern.” Amen to that.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    The plethora of 'self-help' books out there does mean that they all start to appear anodyne and, frankly, condescending. Yet, it seems there are endless numbers of folk who are searching outside of themseles for the answers that are actually within their own grasp and sometimes, just sometimes, that help is found. Even if it is just one sentence or paragraph from the entire book. Such as you ended with... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inspiration can come from anywhere. Perhaps a lot of people find this sort of books helpful. Perhaps the world is not reading seriously nowadays.

      Delete
  2. Sometimes i think people continue to write the obvious because despite its nature being so obvious, its not common. There will always be a need to produce these books because as you said, if everyone was rational, the world would be a utopia. Too bad, those who actually need to read these books will never because irrationality is a way of life for them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, people need to be reminded and prodded frequently.

      Delete
  3. ...for years I have said that I live with a serious handicap, I was born with a rational mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clear Reason is a severe handicap in a world of loonies.

      Delete
  4. Taking care of people , In that line of work I seen people who isn't adaptable.
    Coffee is on, and stay safe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adaptability is a very human characteristic. But there are exceptions too.

      Delete
  5. Human and rational in the same sentence? Come on now, get serious!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r

Country without a national language

India has no national language because the country has too many languages. Apart from the officially recognised 22 languages are the hundreds of regional languages and dialects. It would be preposterous to imagine one particular language as the national language in such a situation. That is why the visionary leaders of Independent India decided upon a three-language policy for most purposes: Hindi, English, and the local language. The other day two pranksters from the Hindi belt landed in Bengaluru airport wearing T-shirts declaring Hindi as the national language. They posted a picture on X and it evoked angry responses from a lot of Indians who don’t speak Hindi.  The worthiness of Hindi to be India’s national language was debated umpteen times and there is nothing new to add to all that verbiage. Yet it seems a reminder is in good place now for the likes of the above puerile young men. Language is a power-tool . One of the first things done by colonisers and conquerors is to