Skip to main content

Human Irrationality

Book Review

Title: The Upside of Irrationality

Author: Dan Ariely

Publisher: Thorsons – HarperCollins, London, 2010

Pages: 334

Ever since my youth, I have questioned the definition of human as a rational being. If humans were rational, the world would have been a kind of utopia. Just imagine everyone thinking rationally. There would be no crimes simply because crime is the most irrational deed one can do. The only drawback of that sort of a world would be that it might be a bit boring.

It is since irrationality has fascinated me forever that I bought this book, The Upside of Irrationality, by Dan Ariely. I wanted to learn more interesting facts about human irrationality. But, unfortunately, this book has little to offer. It tells us what we already know.

The book is divided into two parts. Part 1 deals with irrationality at our workplaces and part 2 with irrationality at home. Workplace and home are the two places where we spend most of our time. Our irrationality will be most visible there, no doubt. However, we don’t need an international bestselling author on psychology to tell us that our work will be a burden unless we are able to discover a meaning and purpose in it [chapter 2] or that we tend to overvalue what we make ourselves [chapters 3 & 4]. An entire chapter [5] is devoted to tell us how an apology can ease most painful situations and prevent the engendering of vindictive feelings in others.

The most banal counsel provided by the author, I think, comes in chapter 6 where he teaches us about human adaptation. Humans adapt all too easily to any situation, even to our pay levels – high or low. Even to our homes. The initial delight over the tiles and built-in furniture as well as the annoyance with the unpleasant kitchen settings will all give way to casual acceptance and getting on. The worst is when the author tells us how to adapt when the financial going gets bad: cut down on your expenses, especially alcohol. You don’t need an international bestseller to tell you that, do you?

What if the mate you are looking for is not as handsome/beautiful as you had dreamt of? Which option will you choose?

1.     alter your perception of aesthetics – I like bald men [you hated them so far]

2.     reconsider the rank of attribution – I don’t like bald men, but I look at other things.

3.     don’t adapt – I’ll never like bald men.

If you don’t know which option is right, you will find this book useful.

This is not to say that the book is not worth reading. Maybe, I have read too much of this type and there is little new to add. Psychology hasn’t grown much beyond what your grandmother taught you with her accumulated wisdom.

I liked the last chapter [11] which speaks about the lessons from our irrationalities. “If we learn to question ourselves and test our beliefs, we might actually discover when and how we are wrong and improve the ways we love, live, work, innovate, manage, and govern.” Amen to that.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    The plethora of 'self-help' books out there does mean that they all start to appear anodyne and, frankly, condescending. Yet, it seems there are endless numbers of folk who are searching outside of themseles for the answers that are actually within their own grasp and sometimes, just sometimes, that help is found. Even if it is just one sentence or paragraph from the entire book. Such as you ended with... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inspiration can come from anywhere. Perhaps a lot of people find this sort of books helpful. Perhaps the world is not reading seriously nowadays.

      Delete
  2. Sometimes i think people continue to write the obvious because despite its nature being so obvious, its not common. There will always be a need to produce these books because as you said, if everyone was rational, the world would be a utopia. Too bad, those who actually need to read these books will never because irrationality is a way of life for them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, people need to be reminded and prodded frequently.

      Delete
  3. ...for years I have said that I live with a serious handicap, I was born with a rational mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clear Reason is a severe handicap in a world of loonies.

      Delete
  4. Taking care of people , In that line of work I seen people who isn't adaptable.
    Coffee is on, and stay safe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adaptability is a very human characteristic. But there are exceptions too.

      Delete
  5. Human and rational in the same sentence? Come on now, get serious!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...