Skip to main content

Being Christian in BJP’s India



A moment of triumph for India’s women’s cricket team turned unexpectedly into a controversy about religious faith and expression, thanks to some right-wing footsloggers. After her stellar performance in the semi-final of the Wormen’s World Cup (2025), Jemimah Rodrigues thanked Jesus for her achievement. “Jesus fought for me,” she said quoting the Bible: “Stand still and God will fight for you” [1 Samuel 12:16]. Some BJP leaders and their mindless followers took strong exception to that and roiled the religious fervour of the bourgeoning right wing with acerbic remarks.

If Ms Rodrigues were a Hindu, she would have thanked her deity: Ram or Hanuman or whoever. Since she is a Christian, she thanked Jesus. What’s wrong in that? If she was a nonbeliever like me, God wouldn’t have topped the list of her benefactors.

Religion is a talisman for a lot of people. There’s nothing wrong in imagining that some god sitting in some heaven is taking care of you. In fact, it gives a lot of psychological push. I’m reminded of an allegory I heard long ago in a motivational class. A little girl was carried by her father on a bicycle gliding over a steel rope that spanned a deep ravine. She was asked later whether she was frightened. “No,” she said promptly. “Why?” “Because I was sitting in the lap of my father.” God is like that father for a lot of believers, I understand. Just because I’m unable to achieve that kind of faith, I won’t ever question other people’s faith. 

By Gemini AI

The question now is not faith, but faith in which god. Should Jemimah Rodrigues believe in Rama just because Rama happens to be the favourite god of India now? Can’t she pray to Jesus and still be an Indian cricketer?

“I thank Jesus, my parents and my coach” she said after her stunning performance. “Jesus helped me chase down a massive 339 runs.”

The right-wing footsloggers went berserk on social media.

A J Philip, senior journalist, wrote in Indian Currents: “In an age where faith is sometimes reduced to hashtags and temple selfies, here was purity — conviction without theatrics, humility without apology. She thanked her team, praised her captain Harmanpreet Kaur, and showed what leadership looks like — shared glory, not solitary boasting.” [Thanks to my friend Jose Maliekal for sending me that article.]

India should have appreciated those qualities: humility, gratefulness, sports spirit… Instead India chose to slam the cricketer for her religious faith. Amitava Kumar wrote in The Indian Express that “Giving a political colour to Jemimah Rodrigues’ post-match comments robs the country of savouring a famous victory to the fullest.” Yes, the right-wing response to Rodrigues’ expression of her religious faith puts India in a primitive age of savage clannishness.

Can’t we focus on what unites us (achievement, human effort, dedication) rather than what divides us (religion)? Why can’t India, which taught the world the noblest of all spiritualities – Tatvam Asi – respect individual freedom in matters of religious faith especially when such faith has nothing to do with public affairs?


Who decides which God you will pray to?


PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon 2025


Comments

  1. I find religion a fogged vision. As civilisations change, gods and their names and appearances change. We don't know which god lived 10,000 years ago and we don't know which god will live 10,000 years from now! Faith is a personal choice, and should remain that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed faith is a personal choice determined mostly by one's family's religion. That religion and its god(s) get rooted in one's psyche and it's almost impossible to remove that. If people actually give up that god(s) as in religious conversions, it must be a painful process for them. And it they accept that pain, then the religion from which people convert has a lot to answer.

      Delete
  2. Being Hindu too is a tough life today unless you are a believer of the Hindutva regime. It's so sad that religion overshadows everything in the country today. The PM has not yet congratulated the team!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely, Hinduism has nothing to do with Hindutva. If only today's right-wing people actually learnt the advaita philosophy of the Upanishads!

      Delete
  3. I am glad you wrote about this. Religion should always be a personal matter. Jemmy's decision to name the God she believed in was personal, and should have remained so. Unfortunately, the fools have mixed up being Indian with being a Hindu, not realising that they are tarnishing their own God!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tarnishing a whole civilisation, I'd say. India has reached the nadir of civilisation. Let's hope the cyclical ascent will begin soon.

      Delete
  4. We boast about our civilisation but how many are civilised; and She thanked Jesus not Christians and Jesus didn’t create the Christians rather He showed the way to humanity. Why these fools should insist what a winner should speak? Should there be any censorship to speak in public, where there’s a mix of 1000 plus religion 😝

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She didn't even speak; it was only a kind of prayer or expression of prayerful gratitude. The reaction it evoked speaks voluminously about the damage done to the social fabric of the country.

      Delete
  5. Thanks for this post. Pandit Nehru wwhethervas secular and so for him, big dams and factories were the new temples of New India. But he would not forcefeed either Gandhi Or Patel, his secularism. Religion is both an opium and chilly. It could douse thin critiWeber spirit. Also it could give rise to rational and prophetic civizational breakthroughs, whether in Egypt's slave-fields or cricket pitch of Navi Mumbai. Both Marx and Weber are correct in their perspectives on re ligion. What is wrong if Jemima found enthused by her god. I am earnestly praying to my God, for the conversion of rabid bigots, more than the conversion of sinners. Let there be a thousand gods, who ergize us, but not divide us. Whether it is the Trinity or the Trimurrhy, the Divine is at the root, Plural, radical plurality in the tension ofUnity.. A Celebration ofDiffetences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every time our Man tries to belittle Nehru, he becomes puny. The littleness of his heart and brain has inflicted so much harm on the nation.

      Delete
  6. What's funny is if that were reversed here, if a sports star thanked Rama instead of Jesus, our entire right wing crazy train would have lost their minds, and we wouldn't hear the end of it. Religious liberty for me, not for you. That seems to be how it goes nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Even though religion is a personal choice, there's no reason its public expression should draw this kind of adverse reaction, unless the act causes civil life disruption. Which however happens during so many of our festivals and nobody has anything to say about it then. This is a very sad episode and should make the regime's head hang in shame.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, religion shouldn't cause this sort of sound and fury. It happens because people are taught wrong things about religion.

      Delete
  8. The moment she said Jesus, I knew it's going ruffle some feathers. I kept off all those radical comments. You are right. It's her faith. She did nothing wrong by thanking Jesus. We all know that God is known by different names.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pradeep, I just concluded this series (Half Marathon posts) today with an appeal for renewed liberalism in our country. Do read if you have the time. https://matheikal.blogspot.com/2025/11/why-india-needs-to-reclaim-it-liberal.html

      Delete
  9. I decide on the God I pray to. Religion is an immensely private matter, and we call ourselves secular. To each his own...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That should be the ideal. Instead we keep poking our nose...

      Delete
  10. I also applaud the line....If I can't achieve that kind of faith..

    ReplyDelete
  11. I stopped by your site after a long time, and it seems there’s quite a lively discussion going on about a topic I don’t usually engage in. Stepping away for now, but I’ll be back for another visit soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Silence on the face of injustice is collusion with injustice. And speech demands courage on such occasions.

      Delete
  12. It is sad that we are no loner a secular country. I wish we could remind the country how India was birn and what it stands for. Please watch Leila, a series on Netflix. Its a showcase of what India is going to be like in the future,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the recommendation. I'd like to watch that, let me see.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The music of an ageing man

Having entered the latter half of my sixties, I view each day as a bonus. People much younger become obituaries these days around me. That awareness helps me to sober down in spite of the youthful rush of blood in my indignant veins. Age hasn’t withered my indignation against injustice, fraudulence, and blatant human folly, much as I would like to withdraw from the ringside and watch the pugilism from a balcony seat with mellowed amusement. But my genes rage against my will. The one who warned me in my folly-ridden youth to be wary of my (anyone’s, for that matter) destiny-shaping character was farsighted. I failed to subdue the rages of my veins. I still fail. That’s how some people are, I console myself. So, at the crossroads of my sixties, I confess to a dismal lack of emotional maturity that should rightfully belong to my age. The problem is that the sociopolitical reality around me doesn’t help anyway to soothe my nerves. On the contrary, that reality is almost entirely re...

Break Your Barriers

  Guest Post Break Your Barriers : 10 Strategic Career Essentials to Grow in Value by Anu Sunil  A Review by Jose D. Maliekal SDB Anu Sunil’s Break Your Barriers is a refreshing guide for anyone seeking growth in life and work. It blends career strategy, personal philosophy, and practical management insights into a resource that speaks to educators, HR professionals, and leaders across both faith-based and secular settings. Having spent nearly four decades teaching philosophy and shaping human resources in Catholic seminaries, I found the book deeply enriching. Its central message is clear: most limitations are self-imposed, and imagination is the key to breaking through them. As the author reminds us, “The only limit to your success is your imagination.” The book’s strength lies in its transdisciplinary approach. It treats careers not just as jobs but as vocations, rooted in the dignity of labour and human development. Themes such as empathy, self-mastery, ethical le...

Mahatma Ayyankali’s Relevance Today

About a year before he left for Chicago (1893), Swami Vivekananda visited Kerala and described the state (then Travancore-Cochin-Malabar princely states) as a “lunatic asylum.” The spiritual philosopher was shocked by the brutality of the caste system that was in practice in the region. The peasant caste of Pulayas , for example, had to keep a distance of 90 feet from Brahmins and 64 feet from Nairs. The low caste people were denied most human rights. They could not access education, enter temple premises, or buy essentials from markets. They were not even considered as humans. Ayyankali (1863-1941) was a Pulaya leader who emerged to confront the situation. I just finished reading a biography of his in Malayalam and was highly impressed by the contributions of the great man who came to be known in Kerala as the Mahatma of the Dalits . What prompted me to order a copy of the biography was an article I read in a Malayalam periodical last week. The article described how Ayyankali...