The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi]


The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8th – 10th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion.

The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394].

The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploiting and deceiving the original people of the land. Consequently, the Pulayas and Parays lost not only their lands but also their freedoms. Soon after the arrival of the Brahmins in Kerala, the Pulayas and Parayas became “untouchable” slaves who were sold in the markets like cattle. The Kshatriya kings were crowned by the Brahmins and the duo ensured their own welfare at the cost of the others. [Something similar is happening now in India – history repeats.]

Pulayas and Parays were not the only original inhabitants of Kerala. There were other proto-Dravidian tribal cultivator groups like the Kuravas. They cleared forests and practised shifting cultivation. Paddy and millet were the primary crops. The land belonged to the tribes, as mentioned above, and not to individuals. There was no caste system; all were equal.

With the arrival of the Brahmins from the North, the entire system underwent radical changes. The original owners of land now became tenants or labourers overnight. By 11th century, they were enslaved totally. This slavery, which was similar to what the West did to the blacks in Africa, continued for centuries. A letter written by Henry Baker Jr, pastor of a missionary order, to his senior authority on 12 Oct 1847, mentions that a slave child’s price was between 6 and 18 rupees. These Christian missionaries contributed their wholehearted services to put an end to the slavery. No wonder, a lot of the indigenous people converted to Christianity in Kerala.

Local leaders emerged too around this time. Right now I’m reading the biography of one such leader, Ayyankali. It is this book that inspired this post. I will review the book as soon as I finish reading it. In the meanwhile, I wanted to bring a parallel here, a parallel between what is happening now in India and what happened in the history of Kerala. I’m not going to make the comparisons more explicit.

The original owners of Kerala became slaves of certain people who brought in their religion and gods. Even today many of them remain landless or poverty-ridden, though quite many were saved by the various welfare schemes and reservations provided by earlier governments. But whatever landlessness and poverty still linger on is the result of historical displacement.

Do you know how many thousands of people have been displaced from their own lands in the last ten years in the name of development? Just one statue, the Statue of Unity in Gujarat, alone displaced 75,000 tribals in 72 villages in the Narmada district. Add to that figure the thousands of others displaced by mines and industries in other areas of India. The truth is no one will tell you the truth on these figures. No one wants you to know. 

Development

Let us conclude this with a recent example. Just over a month back, the Bihar government leased 1050 acres of land to Adani Power for a rent of one rupee per year. The land had ten lakh (one million) trees, including mango and litchi orchards. But the government declared the land “barren” and took it over from farmers numbering to about 1000. The government had their religion and gods for support. We are a religious nation now.

 

Comments

  1. Thanks so much for this post. I gone hoarse telling this story. is there any academic reference to validate this? ( this is how brahmanism seeps in)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some good references:

      Kesavan Veluthat – The Early Medieval in South India:
      Argues that tribal cultivators became lower castes during Brahmin settlement.

      Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai – “Brahmin Settlements in Kerala”:
      Shows how landownership shifted to Brahmin institutions.

      K. P. Padmanabha Menon – History of Kerala:
      Notes that Pulayas were the earliest farming communities.

      P. K. Gopalakrishnan – Kerala Samskaram:
      Discusses the transformation of free agriculturists into agrestic slaves.

      Robin Jeffrey – The Decline of Nair Dominance:
      Provides data on slavery and caste in 19th-century Kerala.

      Tara Nair & K. Saradamoni – Studies on the history of slavery in Kerala.

      Delete
    2. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/modernity-of-slavery-9780198099765?cc=in&lang=en&

      Delete
  2. Just read the headlines of the Hindu of this morning - the reversal of its own Judgement by the Supreme Court Bench, headed by the CJ. And thr note of Dissent by the Judge of Minority Judgement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we have a Chief Justice who is on the side of the illegal constructions merely because "we shouldn't throw money in dustbin." Money is more important than justice for him because that money belongs to a particular group of people.

      Delete
  3. This is a very interesting post. I had no idea these tribes existed or their history. Best regards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. India has more tribes than any country, I think. Over 700. The paradox is that our present Prime Minister wants to steamroller all that diversity for the sake of his pet notion of One Nation One People One Religion One Culture One Language... In fact, he thinks the country is an extension of his One huge Ego.

      Delete
  4. Hari Om
    Much as the English elite did to the the Irish and Scottish, impoverishing the traditional crofting family groups, making them serfs and tenants and treating them little above the level of animals. History is full of such 'colonisation' and there are few nations untouched by such ignominy. That this behaviour continues is heinous... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even today a lot of these people are subjected to much ignominy in many ways in the name of caste. My wrath against the BJP is primarily because of their utter hypocrisy in this regard. They are bringing back the ancient ruthless caste system in a new way.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Yes, and that's pathetic especially because too many Indians think it's all nationalism.

      Delete
  6. Very interesting post. Actually, I wasn't aware of some finer details until I read this. It's something that has happened, and still happening in different ways in several parts of the world. Quite sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed it is not just an Indian phenomenon. In fact, the caste system is not Indian in its roots. I hope you understand what I mean.

      Delete
  7. Sounds familiar. They say that history doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme. The same things happen over and over but in slightly different ways. You'd think we'd learn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forget learning, we're repeating the mistakes more foolishly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts