Skip to main content

From a Teacher's Diary


I am a teacher in an exclusively residential boy’s public school in Delhi.  The parents of each of my students pay an annual fee of about Rs 200,000.  That’s nothing much compared to the fees charged by international schools in Delhi. Yet that’s quite a lot compared to the annual per capita income of an Indian.  So I, as a teacher in such a school, would expect certain standard of behaviour from my students.  For example, I would expect that the students want value for the money that their parents are paying (paisa wasool, is that the right phrase?)  I would expect my students to gain as much as they can from the classes, from the sprawling playgrounds (which most Delhi schools cannot afford), and from the very routine of a residential school.
What do I, as a teacher, actually see?  I see my students trying to bunk off from classes.  Ok, you can blame the teacher for not trying to make the classes as interesting as Kapil Sibal’s CCE envisages them to be.  I see my students running away from games!  I see them running away from co-curricular and extra-curricular activities which are actually supposed to be fun. I see them running away from everything that’s presented as their duty, but which are actually quite fun.
CBSE [Central Board of Secondary Education] introduced certain changes this year in the class XI English.  One such change was meant to inculcate a taste for reading among students.  I assigned the task to my students.  I liberalised (since liberalisation is the accepted policy these days) the task further to make it easier and more interesting for my students.  Finally I called them one by one for the viva voce examination which carries 10 marks.
The examination proved that most of the students had not bothered to read the book on which they had to do the project.  Even my liberalisation policy which suggested that they could read any book of their choice did not work!  Forget the classics suggested by CBSE.  My students chose to copy the summary of some book from the internet.  Some chose to write about the fairy tale they had studied in class IV or V. 
When I persisted with my intention to make them read something, a few of them condescended to say, “Ok, sir, I’ll read a book for the next project.”  At least a few were polite enough to make it appear not condescending, thank my stars.  And most were honest enough to admit that they had not done what they were supposed to do.
I appreciated their honesty.  And I gave them grades generously.  Because the viva voce exam was meant to check their spoken English, not their moral values or psychological merits. 
The English teachers can produce students who can speak English fluently.  The subject teachers can make students pass the entrance exams of IITs or such prestigious institutions.  But who will produce values in them?  Qualities?  And how?
CBSE is introducing questions in every subject to test the moral values of students!  I’m not joking.  There will be a question in every subject from now on to check the moral values of students. 
I’d like to laugh. 

Comments

  1. I remember in my high school, my language teacher chose to assign everyone a two part book - it was a fiction thriller(at that time, this extra reading thing wasn't a part of the course) but the school had this noble idea of trying to make all the students well read. What the teacher did was that she narrated and recited the first part of the thriller in such a manner that our curiosity forced us to read the second part of the book on our own!
    Another teacher of a different section made it compulsory for all the boys to read any two books of Chetan Bhagat and the girls to read any two books of Mills and Boon. Although both the section of these books are like comics without illustrations but all she wanted to do was to get them to start reading on their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sid, different teachers employ different strategies... Earlier I used to narrate a part of the story of some modern classic (e.g. A Tale of 2 Cities) so that an interest would be created in the students to read the book. A few would read the books too. That was quite some time ago. Slowly the computers and phones with the internet came and the students got busy with Orkut, Facebook, etc. Who wants to read now? Who has the time?!

      Delete
  2. Take it easy Matheikal:) Who am I to preach or advise? I'm just thinking aloud! The times have changed since our schooldays and will continue to be changing( ..they aren't Wordsworth's Rainbow!!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The times have changed, Amit. And I'm not alarmed really. Just concerned, that's all. I'm lucky in a way that there are still some students who still value my rather conservative views - conservative for the social networking generation.

      Delete
  3. You are not going to like what I am going to say, Matheikal. Science cannot be taught without a big dollop of morality. For example, can evolution through natural selection ever be devoid of moral questions about whether it is good or bad that tigers prey on antelopes in a cotillion performed in the forest? Or, going to physical sciences, should we have at all unlocked the secrets of nuclear energy? Or, figured out how medicines help the healing process (the inevitable concomitant discovery of how chemicals can kill people also arises out of this)?

    Morality through science seems to have a stronger foundation. However, whether it would reach into the minds of the students is a difficult question. Ultimately it may even turn out that it cannot.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who told you I wouldn't like this, Raghuram? I think you look at my writing from a particular angle. Probably, a problem with scientists! :)

      I was not laughing at the impossibility of teaching moral values through any particular subject; I was laughing at the concept that values could be examined this way. In psychological testing there are a few aspects that should be guarded against: faking, seeking social acceptability, etc. How is the teacher of any subject able to identify such strategies employed by a student in answering the 'values questions'? There are other practical problems, too, if you think about it seriously. Can values be really taught in a bookish way like we do with other subjects? If they could be why did our moral science and religion classes fail so miserably?

      I agree with you absolutely that science can be the best teacher of morality. What better morality is there than learn scientific outlooks, thinking, reasoning, and temper? Again, did all the teaching of science so far achieve anything much in this regard? If not, why? These are the questions that rise in my mind making me laugh at CBSE's attempt to create values in students by adding a question in each subject. I don't know if I have made myself clear enough to you. But the situation as I see is ridiculous enough for me.

      Delete
  4. Hi M,

    Yes teaching is turning out to be a very worrisome profession day by day. I am also a teacher at the same lvel +2, in South Africa. You may not believe this, my learners come on empty stomach. We teachers have to organise some soup kitchen for them to see that they do not go to the classes on empty stomach. This is a no fees government school. there are some government and private schools here with an annual fee within the range of 3 to 5 lakhs RS. there the stories are different.

    Indian education is also lacking when it comes to learning for citizenship. Cramming in some knowledge for getting scores was generally considered as the educational objectives there or in all schools globally.

    But now all are changing. The current objectives are for knowledge, value creation,, right choices etc. Though value education may appear to be a big joke in India people like KS are seemingly under pressure to bring India's education in line with the above objectives.

    And south africa is no exception.

    Here we do have gone through a lot of experiments on Outcome Based Education and one such outcome is moral values.

    I am not saying it is any easy. But that is the demand. But how do you train the teachers for all these new approaches in India? or let me put in in another way, do you get trained?

    I am interested in the new CBSE curriculum you mentioned . Can you please send me a link of that if available.

    http://indiablooming.com/

    prasannaragh@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand the problem you face, especially when you have to go beyond the job of teaching...

      The link for the CBSE curriculum is here:
      http://www.cbse.nic.in/welcome.htm
      Once you enter that site, you'll be directed to an array of links depending on which session, which subject... that you wish to look for.

      In some places in India, the situation is not much better than the one you're facing there. I'm lucky to be working in a different kind of school. But there are hundreds of schools in India's rural wilderness where the situation is pathetic. Will Kapil Sibal's vision work there? What can a teacher in a govt school with 70 students in each class, and no infrastructure worth its name, do to implement the grand vision?...

      Well...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...