Skip to main content

The Pope Retires




Pope Benedict XVI has announced his decision to retire.  Let’s hope that the Catholic Church will get a liberal and visionary Pope.

Benedict XVI was one of the most conservative popes of the recent times.  He failed to tackle certain important issues that rocked the church, particularly related to sexual matters.  The Church’s attitude to homosexuality has always remained ultra-conservative and Benedict XVI did not help to understand the issue in any intelligent light.  The issue of priests’ marriage was shelved conveniently even when the misdeeds of many priests, particularly instances of paedophilia, rocked the Church many a time.  The ordination of women as priests was not given due consideration.

A year before Benedict XVI was anointed the Pope, he was described as his predecessor’s “Grand Inquisitor” by theologian Hans Kung.  Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger (who later became Pope Benedict XVI) together persecuted many theologians who advocated liberal and sensible approaches to contemporary problems.  Under their leadership, the Catholic Church remained one of the most obscurantist religions in the late 20th century.

There’s much that a good Pope can do for the Church.  In his history of the Catholic Church Hans Kung suggests that the Church should support:

·         a social world order: a society in which human beings have equal rights, live in solidarity with one another, and in which the ever-widening gulf between rich and poor is bridged;
·         a plural world order: a reconciled diversity of cultures, traditions and peoples...
·         a world order in partnership: a renewed fellowship of men and women in the church and society...
·         a world order which furthers peace

The Church has always remained a very narrow institution with unabashed holier-than-thou attitudes.  A broad-minded Pope can make the Church a meaningful and relevant institution in the 21st century.

Comments

  1. Hope the same for all religions today... The need of the hour is to use the faith that people have in religion, to spread love and more humaneness, instead of antagonism and ill-will...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, every religion stands much in need of reformation today.

      Delete
  2. I think every religion needs some sensible leaders. We lack that in every sphere ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Aram, the leader does make a lot of difference. Emperor Constantine made all the difference to the Church in his time. A good Pope can revolutionise the Church.

      We lack good leaders in every sphere today; so true.

      Delete
  3. “Let’s hope that the Catholic Church will get a liberal and visionary Pope.” – Who was the last one, the one who did something (Vatican II) in the 1960s? He was liberal only to the extent that he was marginally to the right side [Left is right!] of the entrenched powers.

    “Benedict XVI was one of the most conservative popes of the recent times.” I am not disputing this, but it was only in the fact that his conservatism was of the in-your-face kind – vis-à-vis Muslims, Jews, Liberation Theology, Anglicans – you name it. He learned well at the feet of his predecessor, John Paul II. John Paul II had his reasons, was a product of Poland and Communism. No such easy way out for Benedict XVI.

    EVERY ONE of the things Hans Kung suggests that the Roman Catholic Church support is a NON-STARTER!

    “A broad-minded Pope?” Ouch, that hurts this atheist’s sentiments!

    Raghuram Ekambaram

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John XXIII was the one who started the Vatican II with the intention of "opening the windows" of the church to the world. But the poor man did not live to see the end of the Council. His successor Paul VI was too conservative to implement John's vision. John Paul I wished to combine the large-heartedness of John and sternness of Paul (hence the combined name) but was not allowed to (by nature or by design, I can't say for sure). Shall we look forward to a John XXIV?

      Delete
  4. God knows what tempests raged in the heart of Pope Benedict XVI. Only time will tell if "Broad-minded Pope" will be a reality or an oxymoron.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uma, John XXIII was one such Pope. John Paul I would have been too, I think; but he died before he could prove himself.

      Delete
  5. All religions are good - they teach you to be better human beings - in touch with your humanity. Unfortunately, religious heads have another agenda - to ensure their religion is promoted over other religions come what may. That is why they don't punish the people who are supposed to be the stalwarts but who, instead, make other people's lives miserable by their ugly actions. Great post, Matheikal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, KayEm, it's the hidden agenda that spoil religions.

      Delete
  6. Excellent blog. I concur with what you say; "A broad-minded Pope can make the Church a meaningful and relevant institution in the 21st century."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Gracy. Nice to see you here.

      A leader makes a huge difference, yes!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived