Skip to main content

A Utopian Dream


Book Review

Title     : Swaraj
Author : Arvind Kejriwal
Publisher         : Harper Collins India & India Today Group, 2012
Pages               : 151                            Rs. 150

Arvind Kejriwal is driven by his passion to sweep clean the Indian political system.  His book, Swaraj, is redolent of that passion from the first page to the last.  The book, claims Anna Hazare on the front cover, “is a manifesto for our times and for the anti-corruption movement...” In fact, the book may be seen as a manifesto of Kejriwal’s Aam Admi Party whose election symbol is the broom.

The book reads like a pamphlet written by a puritan mind seized with the zeal for political reformation.  The tone is very demagogic and self-righteous.  Examples are taken randomly from here and there to substantiate arguments without giving certain necessary details like the names of people or firms involved. 

There is only one central argument in the book: power should be given to the people of India and the gram panchayat is the ideal form of governance.  Let the people of each village take the decisions on matters that affect them.  Give power to the people to made decisions as well as to implement them.  That also means revenue which should be placed in the hands of the people.

Kejriwal makes it sound effective.  He gives apparently convincing arguments against all possible criticism of his view.  For example, if you question him on the efficacy of the gram panchayat  citing the example of perverted khap panchayats in some North Indian states he would say, “It is a matter of contention whether the khaps have given such judgements, but without getting into the debate, we would like to reiterate that under the present law, the gram sabhas do not enjoy such powers (as pronouncing death sentences)...” 

The real question is not what powers gram sabhas have or do not have, but whether they are incorruptible.  Kejriwal thinks that they are incorruptible.  A whole village cannot be corrupt, he thinks. 

It is true that Indian democracy stands in need of redemption from the many evils that plague it today.  But will Kejriwal’s suggestion be a real panacea as he would like us to believe? 

The book reads like a villager’s guide to the Aam Admi Party’s political vision.  Those who are aware of the country’s complexities – cultural, social, religious, ethnic, political, and so on – may find Kejriwal’s exuberant tongue lashing (which is how it came across to me) a rather simplistic utopian dream.


The book notwithstanding, I’m toying with the idea of casting my vote for the Aam Admi Party in the next general elections.  There's no harm in trying out a new idea.  As Kejriwal himself says in the book, if the gram sabha decides to steal the money sanctioned at least it will be the people for whom the money is meant that will be stealing it instead of the MPs, MLAs, bureaucrats and the middlemen.  That's quite a practical thinking.

Acknowledgement: Thanks to a student of mine who gave me the book for reading.  

Comments

  1. My grudge with Kejriwal's policies is similar to the difference of opinion between Tagore and Gandhi. Kejriwal is very inward looking(though a lot of people in India would justify that) and I believe that he will pick up the same track of governance that Nehru and Patel pickup up post 47. But this isn't the 50s and swedeshi and swaraj and both out of vogue(if not obsolete). If we are to keep up with growth, his model of decentralization has to be coupled with broader international trends. To my understanding, with him at the helm, that's not possible.

    By the way talking of swaraj, is it really possible? I'd be damned to think that even a country like the US(arguably the most independent country) practice Swaraj. It is akin to indirectly closing your economy to the outside and wasting your demographic dividend.

    Recently his party workers came to my house to ask for my support(as I was earlier involved with the movement in close tandem). I confronted them with my dilemma. A middle aged man among them said 'We'd like to start small'. I nodded but I was thinking that the problem is that they are 'thinking small'. Your vision could be grandiose but your world view remains as small as that of any other political party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I share your concerns, Sid. I too don't find anything profound in Kejriwal's vision and I don't think the Aam Admi Party will be much different from other political parties in India. But the new broom sweeps cleaner than the older ones. So I'm ready for the trial.

      But I do take your concerns about swaraj seriously. India can't afford to isolate itself in today's world which has become too inter-dependent and connected. The pragmatics of implementing his vision and worldview will prompt Kejriwal to make necessary amendments, let's hope.

      Delete
  2. We are a connected world, no longer villages are self sustaining units that made/grew everything they needed. Today every thing is connected and I do not mean online. If too much of decentralization happens it may lead to choas.. Kejriwal has good ideas but even he does not know how he can implement them ( Assuming we will vote for him and not for caste/religion/region/Daru and cash)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kejriwal sounds like an impassioned idealist. Such idealism and passion have their dangers. Yet we are left with very little choice.

      Of course, we don't know what the electoral choice would be.

      Delete
  3. Indeed after reading this post I am building a very positive urge to read this book and the fact that it is written by Arvind Kejriwal..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very good review of the book ! I liked your viewpoints on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most welcome to this space where viewpoint is all what matters.

      Delete
  5. A party is as good as its members. I was a staunch supporter of the AAP till its Mumbai branch accused Dr. Sunawalla of rape and demanded his punishment without waiting for forensic evidence or due process - very scary, especially because the newspaper stories made it all look cooked up. I still feel Arvind Kejriwal is a good person but was disappointed he didn't publicly censure his own party members for being so hasty in passing judgment before the courts had a chance to even look at the case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear KayEm, can a politician ever censure his followers in public?

      There was a large number of intra-organisational squabbles among the India Against Corruption movement which gave birth to AAP. Kejriwal succeeded against all those odds. It means he is a worthy politician.

      Delete
    2. Replying to your question, can a politician ever censure his followers in public. If he can't even censure them for playing with a citizen's life what faith can the public have that he'll use the janlokpal against them at all? That there will be no discrimination between them and the rest? Actions speak so much louder than words.

      Delete
  6. Great review. Only time will tell, as politics has not spared anyone from getting dirty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Power will corrupt even AAP members! But what choice do we, the people, really have?

      Delete
  7. The choices we have are so measly that we are ready for change in any form, anything which is new is always attractive, effectiveness I am not sure about. My only concern with Kejriwal is he is too media hungry and all that I can connect from that is another politician and not a true leader.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is another politician, Athena, you're right. You are also right: we have little choice.

      Delete
  8. I too have my apprehensions about AK, because as the saying goes power corrupts....
    However it is nice to see that young persons are entering political arena so we should give them a try

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really would love to give AK a chance knowing all his limitations. I'm young at heart :)

      Delete
  9. Confidence Vs Arrogance

    Both , Sheila Dikshit ( Congress ) and Vijay Goel ( BJP ) , are loudly proclaiming that their party will win the forthcoming Delhi Assembly Elections , with a thumping majority

    Even Arvind Kejriwal ( Aam Aadmi Party ) is saying the same

    That is understandable , considering that the Commanders must enthuse their cadres

    Such confidence on their part is a pre-requisite for winning

    But what happens when Sheila Dikshit says ,


    “ Aam Aadmi Party ? Who are they ? Nobody !
    They don’t scare us . They are insignificant .
    What is their agenda ? What is their record ?
    People of Delhi will ignore them ! “


    Now , that is bravado

    People of Delhi !

    For over a decade , you have suffered this insult

    4th December is your time to teach a lesson to the arrogant rulers of Delhi

    By voting / electing , at least 40 AAP candidates

    Only you can give yourself a break !


    • hemen parekh ( 12 Oct 2013 )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kudos to you. You are a nice propagandist.

      Let me say that I'm ready to vote AAP. What then? Is Delhi going to be a paradise? Will AAP perform miracles? Will Kejriwal be any different from Sheila Dikshit?

      He will be different from Narendra Modi, I'm sure: he won't kill Muslims.

      I'm voting for him provided the queue is not too long.

      Delete
  10. The one thing I have found in Arvind is that he is willing to evolve...I guess the book was written when he was politically Navie and I bet as he grows into a harden politician his views and ideologies would be very much different..
    How much of a difference he would make in delhi would be hard to tell.. but for the sake of this country's politics he should win as this would be a necessary wake up call for both the national parties

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somewhere deep within me I too find longing for Kejriwal's victory. For reasons similar to the ones you've given.

      Delete
  11. Somehow I don't feel like reading this book. Ever. To me, it seems more like marketing of his political party than a book :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't recommend it to you, Pankti. It's an election manifesto.

      Delete
  12. Kejriwal is a man driven by his passion, and along the way many people may join him and may bring with them ideas too...presently we need some honest people first and then ideas,,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Honest people, hm... that's the problem.

      Can honesty and politics coexist? Don't forget that quite many in Kejriwal's team came under the scanner and failed.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...