Skip to main content

AAP and I



Who defeated Arvind Kejriwal?  Himself or us?

His party ruled for just 49 days.  They were momentous days.  He implemented his promise on setting up a number for reporting corruption; in two weeks instead of the promised two days.  He met people to discuss corruption issues, though the crowd was beyond his control.  He did what he could.  He would have done more if he could. 

He put an end to the VVIP culture in politics.  The politician became aam aadmi.  Ministers started travelling in vehicles without the screaming red lights and horrifying screeches.  But the police had to go out of their way to provide protection to the chief minister.  Who defeated the chief minister’s vision that political leaders need no such protection from their own people?

He revolutionised the admission procedures in schools.  Schools which charged hefty amounts from parents illegally stood to lose.  The aam aadmi would have gained.  Then who defeated AAP?

AAP appointed people who visited the government schools in Delhi to ensure that they are functioning properly.  Procedures were undertaken to end contract labour and thus ensure the welfare of workers.  Steps were taken to train a special commando force for the protection of women in Delhi.  Enquiries were initiated about the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.  Power supply and water supply were being made more effective and efficient – no doubt there were many teething problems.  Harassment of auto rickshaw drivers by the police was stopped.  Government hospitals were made more effective. 

49 days.  What more could be achieved in 49 days by a government with no prior experience?  Kejriwal dared to take up the cudgels against people like Mukesh Ambani who have hijacked the economic system in the country and people like Veerappa Moily who have sold democracy to the corporate sector. 

We keep on accusing our politicians of being corrupt.  When one man took the initiative to clean up that corruption and bring good governance, he failed.  Did he defeat himself by resigning?  Maybe he did.  Was he helpless?  His helplessness is our own.  Is he simply a shrewd politician who is aiming higher – for the PM’s chair?  Well, I will vote for him in the Lok Sabha elections too. 

My likes and dislikes are instinctive initially.  I began to like Kejriwal instinctively just as I disliked Anna Hazare instinctively and hated Modi instinctively.   But I don’t let my instincts dictate terms to me.  I evaluate my instincts with my reason.  So far my reason has told me that my instincts were generally right. 


My instincts tell me that Modi will only work for the corporate sector and use one particular religious community for furthering his ends.  Modi will engender a civil war in the country if he becomes its Prime Minister, my instincts predict.  My instincts tell me that the Congress has become impotent.  My instincts tell me that we need a leader who is a bit cranky.  

Comments

  1. The balanced view on AAP episode, without bias, I ever read. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Balanced, you say, Remi? I thought I was a passionate supporter of AAP :)

      Delete
  2. Sorry but for me Kejriwal is not what your instincts say. He fooled us, if he was serious he can discuss the bill, he should be in power it was we the Janta who given him opportunity and what was that drama that before taking oath he asked public but after becoming CM he has not asked anyone. BJP or congress who were not supporting Lokpal in Delhi, They have passed the bill in national parliament i believe..?

    Chhod do kahna ab AAP AAP shuru karo kahna AapNahiHum.. Aur Haan those who blames modi for genocide should know the fact that from last 12 years there nothing like muzaffarnagar, assam, patna, pune, dilsukhnagar, bangalore.
    Broom supporters start supporting nation not the glamour, sensation and castle is air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are welcome to disagree, Sunny. We live in a democracy, thankfully, which I hope won't turn fascist...

      Delete
  3. I agree completly with your observations on AAP.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "My instincts tell me that Modi will only work for the corporate sector and use one particular religious community for furthering his ends. Modi will engender a civil war in the country if he becomes its Prime Minister, my instincts predict. My instincts tell me that the Congress has become impotent. My instincts tell me that we need a leader who is a bit cranky."
    This is the truth that you have written that is scaring me...What is going to be the future of India?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We need a change, Elizabeth. A drastic change. See what the existing political parties have done wherever they have been in power. Do we want a repetition of it again?

      It's our choice. Democracy has given us the power to vote - the only real power we have in this regard. We can use it wisely.

      Delete
  5. Thanks. I started to wonder whether AAP really did anything except what we saw on mainstream media. You have put their work in detail. They need to be given a chance to make mistakes and achieve their agenda. Next few months are interesting. time for political watchers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pattu, I have wondered again and again why the media and even the public turned against AAP. Yes, the party showed a lot of immaturity. But they were just beginning.

      Thanks for the tolerance you show towards their lack of experience.

      Delete
  6. Kejariwal playing to the gallery. If he is sincere passing the bill, a) he could have challenged the center intervention in the court b) he should have taken sms poll which he did before becoming the CM.

    He was taking centers permission to table "Jan Lokpal Bill" in the parliament. But he did take permission of center to table "Money Bill" in the parliament. Can anybody explain the double standards.

    Everyone looks for his own gain. Before coming to power, he claimed of having evidence Sheila Dixit and didn't even file a FIR against her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No doubt, Rajesh, everyone plays certain games and is selfish too. I don't expect saints to enter politics. It's a question of who is a lesser evil rather than who is a better person? We don't have much choice. But I'm encouraged by the entry of people like Medha Patkar and Sara Joseph in AAP.

      Delete
  7. While I agree with you, my concern about the AAP is that they will go the route of nationalization of power generation and supply, a model that has not served us well. I also think they are against FDI when we do need the money to spur growth. One thing all need to understand is that the economy needs to create jobs. The rest I think will follow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes nationalisation is required, as they did in the Latin American countries where private firms were looting the country's resources (which is happening in India now). Economics is not a static thing, I suppose. It changes as time changes and policies change. Present day capitalism does stand in need of a few reins.

      Delete
  8. AK could have gone a bit slower, in his hurry he did do lot of good things but got caught in a situation where he had to give up.
    Great post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you. AK was a bit too quick. Some actions need more duration - even people don't like quick changes.

      Delete
  9. Interesting comments! I enjoyed each one of them!!
    India is beyond the grasp of any person or party - political or other, not even a government. The People have realized this fact beyond doubt. As a result there have been hung parliaments and assemblies; hence parties run to form alliances. But politicians don't learn the lesson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remi, India is an enigma. We made constitutional rules to eradicate the caste system, but my beloved ex-chief minister (AK) supported the Khap Panchayat in Haryana. We eulogise children's rights, but thousands of children still work or beg... All these people who support development are seeking their OWN development.

      Delete
  10. "Well, I will vote for him in the Lok Sabha elections too."-----He won you over...mission accomplished for him.

    PS: I don't prescribe to your views. Somehow I find him full of drama and theatrics. Anyway, time will tell how true your instincts were :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also find him a bit cranky, Pankti. But I find cranky people doing less evil than the supposedly sane ones.

      Delete
  11. Matheikal, AAP style of politics ( i.e we alone are honest and patriotic) scares me. This kind of negative politics can only bring untold misery. Idealism has no place in politics of governance and best is the enemy of the good.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AK was I suppose over enthusiastic. In our country were deep rooted habits are the root cause of much problems, one has to be matured and diplomatic in solving them. I had always felt that AAP should have opted to be a strong opposition party in Delhi instead of deciding to rule for the sake of long term benefit.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Read AAP and I. I may agree to what you say. But there is an old saying - A Bird in Hand is worth Two in the Bush. Arvind should have continued as the CM of Delhi (like Narendra Modi is doing) and promoted AAP by carefully selecting candidates, policies, making strong but sensible comments. But by his over ambition or rush to become the PM, AK threw baby with the bath water.

    Incidentally, all that what Arvind has said and is saying are my ideas since 1978 of New Life, New India and New World -- Nav Jivan, Nav Bharat aur Nav Jagat.

    Arvind Kejriwal infact messed up the silent, non-violent people's revolution by rushing in where Angels fear to tread. For more details read my 42nd book Dr. Leo's Lens - The Blueprint for a Holistic Development of India and the Special issue of Just-in-Print (March 1 to 15) at http://justinprint.in/drleorebello.html.

    My instinct too has not failed me. And my instinct tells me that AAP is washed out, unless Arvind meets me one-to-one for serious planning rather than the road shows. Otherwise, even fine ladies like Medha Patkar and Soni Suri may not win. And what about Irom Sharmila? All political parties, including AAP, have forgotten her.

    Keep in touch. Best Wishes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Taliban and India

Illustration by Copilot Designer Two things happened on 14 Oct 2025. One: India rolled out the red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban Administration’s Foreign Minister. Two: a young man was forced to wash the feet of a Brahmin and drink that water. This happened in Madhya Pradesh, not too far from where the Taliban leaders were being given regal reception in tune with India’s philosophy of Atithi Devo Bhava (Guest is God). Afghanistan’s Taliban and India’s RSS (which shaped Modi’s thinking) have much in common. The former seeks to build a state based on its interpretation of Islamic law aiming for a society governed by strict religious codes. The RSS promotes Hindutva, the idea of India as primarily a Hindu nation, where Hindu values form the cultural and political foundation. Both fuse religious identity with national identity, marginalising those who don’t fit their vision of the nation. The man who was made to wash a Brahmin’s feet and drink that water in Madh...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...