Skip to main content

Saving the law from kangaroo courts

The Supreme Court's ruling on Islamic (sharia) courts is a move in the right direction.  Religious courts have no legal binding in India though a lot of such courts became very active recently, of particular concern being the khap panchayats that sealed the fate of many people in some of the North Indian states.  Among the many bizarre judgements delivered by the kangaroo courts is one in which a young woman was 'legally' raped by almost a whole village in West Bengal merely because the man she chose to marry belonged to a different religion.   

When the Constitution of India allowed every citizen to follow his/her religion and its practices, it was not handing over the law on a platter to the priests.  Religions cannot be parallel judiciaries. They can guide and help believers to lead good lives.  In that process of guidance and counselling, if both the aggrieved parties arrive at a consensus the judiciary of the country won't generally interfere unless there are criminal offences involved.  For example, mutually agreed divorces are accepted.

But the simple fact is that the decisions taken by religious courts are really not binding legally.  Any of the aggrieved party can go to the country's proper judicial system to seek justice even after the religious court has passed its verdict.  

The Supreme Court's ruling today means, in simple words, that religion cannot be an alternative judiciary in the country. Whichever religion, it may be. 

The ideal situation would be to have a Uniform Civil Code for the entire country.  The religions should not be allowed to pronounce any legal verdict at all.  India has no state religion.  The Indian Constitution leaves certain personal laws in the domain of each religious community because the country respects the varied customs and traditions, rites and rituals of different communities. However, the tendency recently has been to misuse the provision in the Constitution because semi-literate or purely illiterate village  elders and religious leaders take the law in their hands.  This tendency should be nipped without any mercy.  The law left in the hands of such people will not have even a semblance of justice.  Such people are motivated purely by vested interests.  And it is the duty of the country to save the simple people of the rural backyards from the octopus of religions as well as other kangaroo courts. 

Comments

  1. Kangaroo Courts are prevailing everywhere in India.... :-( they have their own rules and laws and no political party ever dares to confront them ..for that will make the vote-bank heading southwards...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vote bank politics is one of the worst evils in the country today.

      Delete
  2. Really sir, this is a very big problem. We have seen the rise and fall of various religious power over the ages. And by this I mean even the power of the Pope in the middle ages. If this continues, anarchy is not far away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anarchy is the best thing if all human beings were enlightened. But since that is an impossible ideal, the next best is to delink religion from politics. Even the Pope had his powers (which eventually declined, as you say) because of the nexus between religion and politics. Sever the spiritual and the secular - that's the only option we have now.

      Delete
  3. Yes, the Supreme Court's ruling against kangaroo courts is surely a good news but the question still remains. When will people stop using religion as a means to their ends and when will they stop using bigotry and religion in the name of holiness. People must first change their mindsets, it is disgusting to see such incidents occur, victims of which are mostly women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Education and awareness are the most effective tools, Anu. Kangaroo courts are not seen in states with significant population of educated people.

      Delete
  4. Agree with everything you mentioned. Hope people all through the country get aware and educated about it..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poverty is the hindrance, Roohi. RTI is not working since our govt schools are not effective. The govt of each state must ensure that govt schools provide quality, free education to the poor children. Only education can change the present scenario in this regard.

      Delete
  5. Everyday there are fresh news on judgment by kangaroo courts flashes in newspapers and channels along with story of harassment and torture following it.... A real shame of our society.......


    Besides, I will like to invite you to join Kenfolios and enjoy tons of exciting features. Connect, share, and promote with ease @Kenfolios. Come and host your blog in Kenfolios, having even better features than Blogger and Wordpress. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Now that the school has reopened I hardly get time to write. I actually steal time from my sleep in order to keep blogging. So let me wait to accept your invitation :)

      Delete
  6. Very true...it's really a sad state when it comes to status of women's freedom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pankti, have you ever wondered why most religions are eager to create or maintain laws that go against the interests of women?

      Delete
    2. Yup...because men wants to dominate women. They want power and their women under their thumb. So men are helping each other achieve this goal. And stupid women, who are brainwashed by these men, help them too.

      Delete
  7. You are right. There must be a uniform judiciary in our country and religion and its self proclaimed guardians should do what they are actually meant to do. Providing justice isn't their responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Namrata, it actually means separating religion and politics altogether. I think we should ban all religion-based political parties to start with.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...