Skip to main content

Saving the law from kangaroo courts

The Supreme Court's ruling on Islamic (sharia) courts is a move in the right direction.  Religious courts have no legal binding in India though a lot of such courts became very active recently, of particular concern being the khap panchayats that sealed the fate of many people in some of the North Indian states.  Among the many bizarre judgements delivered by the kangaroo courts is one in which a young woman was 'legally' raped by almost a whole village in West Bengal merely because the man she chose to marry belonged to a different religion.   

When the Constitution of India allowed every citizen to follow his/her religion and its practices, it was not handing over the law on a platter to the priests.  Religions cannot be parallel judiciaries. They can guide and help believers to lead good lives.  In that process of guidance and counselling, if both the aggrieved parties arrive at a consensus the judiciary of the country won't generally interfere unless there are criminal offences involved.  For example, mutually agreed divorces are accepted.

But the simple fact is that the decisions taken by religious courts are really not binding legally.  Any of the aggrieved party can go to the country's proper judicial system to seek justice even after the religious court has passed its verdict.  

The Supreme Court's ruling today means, in simple words, that religion cannot be an alternative judiciary in the country. Whichever religion, it may be. 

The ideal situation would be to have a Uniform Civil Code for the entire country.  The religions should not be allowed to pronounce any legal verdict at all.  India has no state religion.  The Indian Constitution leaves certain personal laws in the domain of each religious community because the country respects the varied customs and traditions, rites and rituals of different communities. However, the tendency recently has been to misuse the provision in the Constitution because semi-literate or purely illiterate village  elders and religious leaders take the law in their hands.  This tendency should be nipped without any mercy.  The law left in the hands of such people will not have even a semblance of justice.  Such people are motivated purely by vested interests.  And it is the duty of the country to save the simple people of the rural backyards from the octopus of religions as well as other kangaroo courts. 

Comments

  1. Kangaroo Courts are prevailing everywhere in India.... :-( they have their own rules and laws and no political party ever dares to confront them ..for that will make the vote-bank heading southwards...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vote bank politics is one of the worst evils in the country today.

      Delete
  2. Really sir, this is a very big problem. We have seen the rise and fall of various religious power over the ages. And by this I mean even the power of the Pope in the middle ages. If this continues, anarchy is not far away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anarchy is the best thing if all human beings were enlightened. But since that is an impossible ideal, the next best is to delink religion from politics. Even the Pope had his powers (which eventually declined, as you say) because of the nexus between religion and politics. Sever the spiritual and the secular - that's the only option we have now.

      Delete
  3. Yes, the Supreme Court's ruling against kangaroo courts is surely a good news but the question still remains. When will people stop using religion as a means to their ends and when will they stop using bigotry and religion in the name of holiness. People must first change their mindsets, it is disgusting to see such incidents occur, victims of which are mostly women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Education and awareness are the most effective tools, Anu. Kangaroo courts are not seen in states with significant population of educated people.

      Delete
  4. Agree with everything you mentioned. Hope people all through the country get aware and educated about it..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poverty is the hindrance, Roohi. RTI is not working since our govt schools are not effective. The govt of each state must ensure that govt schools provide quality, free education to the poor children. Only education can change the present scenario in this regard.

      Delete
  5. Everyday there are fresh news on judgment by kangaroo courts flashes in newspapers and channels along with story of harassment and torture following it.... A real shame of our society.......


    Besides, I will like to invite you to join Kenfolios and enjoy tons of exciting features. Connect, share, and promote with ease @Kenfolios. Come and host your blog in Kenfolios, having even better features than Blogger and Wordpress. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Now that the school has reopened I hardly get time to write. I actually steal time from my sleep in order to keep blogging. So let me wait to accept your invitation :)

      Delete
  6. Very true...it's really a sad state when it comes to status of women's freedom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pankti, have you ever wondered why most religions are eager to create or maintain laws that go against the interests of women?

      Delete
    2. Yup...because men wants to dominate women. They want power and their women under their thumb. So men are helping each other achieve this goal. And stupid women, who are brainwashed by these men, help them too.

      Delete
  7. You are right. There must be a uniform judiciary in our country and religion and its self proclaimed guardians should do what they are actually meant to do. Providing justice isn't their responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Namrata, it actually means separating religion and politics altogether. I think we should ban all religion-based political parties to start with.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Taliban and India

Illustration by Copilot Designer Two things happened on 14 Oct 2025. One: India rolled out the red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban Administration’s Foreign Minister. Two: a young man was forced to wash the feet of a Brahmin and drink that water. This happened in Madhya Pradesh, not too far from where the Taliban leaders were being given regal reception in tune with India’s philosophy of Atithi Devo Bhava (Guest is God). Afghanistan’s Taliban and India’s RSS (which shaped Modi’s thinking) have much in common. The former seeks to build a state based on its interpretation of Islamic law aiming for a society governed by strict religious codes. The RSS promotes Hindutva, the idea of India as primarily a Hindu nation, where Hindu values form the cultural and political foundation. Both fuse religious identity with national identity, marginalising those who don’t fit their vision of the nation. The man who was made to wash a Brahmin’s feet and drink that water in Madh...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...