Skip to main content

Children of Darkness



Darkness is a pervasive theme in Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth.  The play opens with three witches one of whom says ominously, “Fair is foul, and foul is fair.”

The protagonists are Macbeth and his wife Lady Macbeth both of whom are described as ‘children of darkness’ by the Shakespearean scholar A. C. Bradley.  It is worth quoting Bradley in some detail.

“These two characters are fired by one and the same passion of ambition; and to a considerable extent they are alike.  The disposition of each is high, proud, and commanding.  They are born to rule, if not to reign.  They are peremptory or contemptuous to their inferiors.  They are not children of light, like Brutus and Hamlet; they are of the world.  We observe in them no love of country, and no interest in the welfare of anyone outside their family.  Their habitual thoughts and aims are ... all of station and power.”

Ambition in itself is a good thing.  But when ambition is coupled with the characteristics highlighted in the quote above, it paves the way to darkness. 

Psychologist Karen Horney (1885-1952) listed ten sources of inner conflicts which give rise to neurotic needs in people.  One such source is ‘the neurotic need for power’.  This need expresses itself in craving power for its own sake, in an essential disrespect for others, and in an indiscriminate glorification of strength and a contempt for weakness.  People who are afraid to exert power openly may try to control others through intellectual exploitation and superiority.  Another variety of the power drive is the need to believe in the omnipotence of will.  Such people feel they can accomplish anything simply by exerting will power. [as summarised by C. S. Hall et al in Theories of Personality]

The similarity between Bradley’s (a literary critic) and Horney’s lists of characteristics of the power-hungry is striking.

We come across people who suffer from this “neurotic need” all too often in our surroundings, not just in politics.  Horney’s solution for this problem is that the person should understand (or be made to understand) that his/her worth does not lie in sitting on a throne pretending or claiming to be a god/goddess.  Psychologically healthy life lies in learning to live with other people on a kind of equal footing, accepting them as they are as well as accepting oneself without the facades of the inflated ego. 

Horney, however, added that the neurotic is not flexible.  Hence the change is not at all easy.  In the words of the literary critic, that neuroticism is the “tragic flaw of the character.”


Not all neuroticism makes people children of darkness.  The simple fact is that most of us possess certain degrees of neuroticism of one kind or another.  The problem is when we start inflicting other people with the fallout of our neuroticism.  It is then that we become the children of darkness and create a world where fair is foul and foul is fair. 

Comments

  1. A good Read sir. Talking about Neurosis I had Anxiety Neurosis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what, Datta Ghosh, I too suffer from the neurotic need for power in my own supposedly intellectual way :)

      Delete
    2. That is more of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Striving towards Self Actualization. :)

      Delete
    3. Yes, you got it absolutely right. And I'm glad you got it right.

      Delete
  2. Indeed sir, Lord and Lady Macbeth were children of Darkness. But what do you think of Othello? Is he a susceptible dark character or 'child of light' led to darkness?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really, Brendan, it's not very easy to classify people. In the sense that Bradley meant and I mean now, Othello is not a child of darkness. He was indeed a child of light until Iago came into his life. The problem with people like Othello is not darkness but innocence, naivete. Strange, given the fact that he was a warrior.

      Delete
    2. Yes really, it isn't easy. But can one only classify based on tragic flaw?

      Delete
    3. A tough question, Brendan. I'm still thinking.

      Delete
  3. Yes such people do exist, we come across them all the time. Self-obsessed and power hungry and very very ambitious.Interesting read. Where do you get the ideas from to write on such diverse topics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I used to read all kinds of books, Nima. A wide interest. In a way, it was a Faustian quest for knowledge. Even now, if I din't have to work and earn my livelihood, I'd spend my time reading books.

      Delete
  4. No one ever could portray the indepth ness or dwell deep into human character like master genius Shakespeare..liked it as it reminded me of my college days

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shakespeare has lasted 4 centuries because of that genius. Glad I could take you back to your college.

      Delete
  5. Out of all other neurotic needs you chose the need of power. This makes me ask you, why?
    Once while browsing the internet I found the answers to my question, I came to know about my neural need. That helped me to ease up certain things in my life.

    Is this need of power somewhere related to you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm the least power-motivated organism in the world, Namrata. I may have certain complexes (like superiority complex), but if I wanted power I could have got it umpteen times in umpteen ways. I think power is the most idiotic thing an individual can acquire. What pleasure will I or any intelligent organism get by bossing over others? I dont know that language of power at all.

      I focused on this issue simply because I'm living with some people who are having that problem. People who refuse to understand the meaning of real power.

      Don't misunderstand my response to Datta Ghosh. That was a challenge to her. Not to me. Not to you.

      Delete
  6. "Psychologically healthy life lies in learning to live with other people on a kind of equal footing, accepting them as they are as well as accepting oneself without the facades of the inflated ego."

    Paradoxical, in a way. "Equal footing" is a very complicated term. It just doesn't involve one person, but also the other person in the equation. And both of them should be sensible to get this message at the same time - " to accept the others as they are"; which means, everybody in this world should get this message at the same time, and if they get it, probably the term ' neuroticism" will die. And probably, just a wild imagination, there will be no reason for soldiers, psychiatrists, police to exist. Goodness wins and what else is left? Heaven is on Earth.

    According to the second law of thermodynamics the entropy of an isolated system never decreases; entropy being the measure of disorder.
    Personally, I don't see much difference in a society too.

    Thanks, you provoked many deep thoughts. This is a random rambling of it all. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sun, happy to have you here, especially with entropy - a concept I love.

      Science cannot work much in human societies except for giving more technology and gadgets. In human societies, entropy works. Miracle works. The "equal footing" that I postulated is a very simple concept: you understand me and I strive to understand you. Let us see how much we can understand each other. If we can't do it at all, let us leave each other alone. Otherwise there will be chaos.

      Keep in touch. I think we will make good company.

      Delete
  7. Need of power is something very basic and perhaps lies in everybody's sub-conscious...you've nicely explained those persons for which this need overwhelms all other... Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are great examples ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is power a basic need, Maniparna? Ask that to the launderer. Or the sweeper. Or to your teacher.

      Delete
  8. Phew.. highly interesting and intellectual.. Humans are obsessed to make otherwise simple life complex :).. I believe it is the side effect of having larger brain and the ability of abstract reasoning.. No wonder i just love babies and animals :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice response from you, Roohi. The intellectuals make things complex. Rather, they perceive the complexity behind the apparent reality.

      I too prefer the company of my young students to that of any adult. Reason: you've already said it. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...