The Hammer of God is a short story by G. K. Chesterton
about two brothers, Wilfred and Norman.
While Wilfred is an exceptionally devout priest, Norman is a retired
colonel who finds his delight in wine and women. Wilfred’s attempts to inject some fear of God
or the divine morality into his brother’s soul are only met with ridicule from
the latter. Finally the priest kills his
brother. Worse, he tries to put the
guilt on Joe, the village idiot.
The theme of Chesterton’s
story is the potential devilishness of self-righteous morality. The
self-righteously religious people see themselves as superior to the normal
people who have certain weaknesses like lust and gluttony. The self-righteous people prefer to pray
alone in some corner or niche of the church or the Satsang, away from the
sinners. They may even ascend some
mountain in search of their superior aloofness.
Standing at a height, actual or metaphorical, they begin to see the
normal people as too small. One can only
see “small things from the peak” when one looks down. Standing on the top of the mountain, if he
were to look up he would have seen infinity stretching far beyond him. The ordinary sinners in the valley look up
and see things big. The self-righteous person looks down and sees everything
small. Revulsion enters his devout
soul. The revulsion wants to destroy
evil which is its perceived cause.
The irony is that the
devout religious person commits much bigger crimes than the ordinary sinners
whom he judges as immoral. Terrorists
and other religious extremists are motivated by this revulsion. Women wearing the dress of their choice are thus
seen as greater sinners than their murderers who commit their hideous crimes in
the name of divine morality. A young man
kissing his beloved while enjoying a romantic evening in a park is a bigger
criminal for the religious person who is the lovers’ potential murderer.
This kind of divine
morality will set limits to other people’s liberties. The Wilfreds among us will decide what we can
eat and drink, how we should dress, which books we may read, and so on.
Father Brown is a priest
who doubles as an amateur detective in Chesterton’s stories. “I am a man,” says Father Brown in the story
cited above, “and therefore have all the
devils in my heart.” Father Brown is not
self-righteous. He does not see himself
as separate from the normal men on the earth.
He is aware of his weaknesses, the weaknesses that haunt every human
being including himself. Just because
one becomes a priest or a guru, godman, Satsangi or whatever, one does not
become entitled to sit in judgment over his fellow human beings. Religion without compassion for fellow human
beings is terrorism, though of varying degrees. Religion without compassion and understanding
of fellow human beings soon ends as a hammer of god. Wilfred had killed his brother with a hammer.
At the end of the story,
Father Brown tells Wilfred, “You tried to fix it (the murder) on the imbecile
(Joe, the idiot) because you knew he could not suffer. That was one of the gleams that it is my
business to find in assassins. And now come
down into the village, and go your own way as free as the wind; for I have said
my last word.”
Father Brown does not
judge. He does not condemn the
sinner. He understands. He understands that a man who cannot accept
suffering himself but can pass it on to an innocent person who won’t ever
understand it can’t be redeemed.
Redemption does not lie in any religious ritual, not in prayers however
devoutly they may be recited from whichever altitude, not in setting up oneself
above others. Redemption lies in the ability
to feel the pain of one’s fellow beings.
Though Father Brown
refuses to reveal the truth to the police, Wilfred goes to the inspector and
says, “I wish to give myself up; I have killed my brother.”
In the end, story's Wilfred understands what he did was wrong, but most self-righteous people who kill and crush others in the name of a superior religious morality are blind to their own crimes.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, Sunil ji. I'm living in the middle of such people.
DeleteMy God Matheikal - you have hit the proverbial nail in the head. Personally, I have always felt that very religious (not spiritual) people get so caught up in their beliefs that they close their mind to any other point of view and tend to measure/judge everyone by their religious measures. That's why I tend to run in the other direction from orthodox people because they are too narrow minded and judgmental. People with flaws, on the other hand, are delightfully human. They also tend to be kinder and forgiving because they know they themselves are flawed.
ReplyDeleteI'm totally with you in this regard. People who are aware of their flaws are delightfully human, while the self-righteous ones are inhuman.
DeleteThe whole ideology behind the concept of morality is to tame humans. Religious script is used to manipulate human behaviours for the benefit of a few.
ReplyDeleteMorality without religion would have been more effective, I think. Religion, as you suggest, is about manipulation of one sort or another.
DeleteSir, i personally liked the way you implemented your views along with the story base. The fact that what self righteous person does to show his dominance above all is in itself pitiful and unmoral from a common point of view !
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I got you entirely. A common man does not have very clear-cut views on most things. Hence he doesn't generally bother about pity or morality in matters regarding superiority. He tends to follow blindly. And the self-righteous religious people exploit that tendency.
DeleteDefining morality, passing judgement, condemning others often becomes a favorite pass time for the so called self righteous people, A live and let live philosophy would any day be better.
ReplyDeleteTolerance and self-righteousness don't go together. So live-and-let-live is an alien philosophy for these people.
DeleteUnfortunately yes.
Delete