Skip to main content

Enlightenment


Historically the Enlightenment refers to a paradigm shift that took place in the 17th and 18th centuries.  It was also called the Age of Reason because it emphasised the power of the human mind to liberate the individual and improve society.  It argued that knowledge can be derived only from experience, experiment and observation.  It encouraged people to use their own critical reasoning to free their minds from prejudice, unexamined authority, and oppression by their religion or the state.

The world made tremendous progress in science and technology because of the Enlightenment ideas.  Consequently human life was revolutionised.  Religion and the superstitions it generated took a backseat.  Priests lost most of their political clout.  Secular values spread considerably across the globe.  Science and technology gave us more leisure and luxury than we deserved.  More gadgets than we could handle with responsibility.  More individual liberty.  More selfishness too.

The Enlightenment is not merely a set of ideas, however.  It is a process.  Like all processes it has its dynamics.  Of late, we see that many values of Enlightenment are diluted by significant populations.  China, for example, is a country which embraced the scientific part of Enlightenment but rejected the individual rights.  There are far too many Islamic organisations which seldom accepted any value of the Enlightenment.  In the USA today, it would be impossible for any political party to come to power if it goes against the organised Christian religions there. 

In spite of all the corruption that had slowly eaten into the polity, India had remained loyal to the Enlightenment values from the time of its independence.  However, that’s changing too.  Right wing organisations are gaining strength weakening the secular fabric of the nation.  Minority rights are being suppressed in ways that are not always very subtle.  The history of the country is being rewritten with a view to lend a particular religious shade to the nation’s very foundations. 

The paradox is that while the Enlightenment secularism is trampled underfoot, the values related to science and technology are embraced with greater vigour.  This is a serious threat.  Science without scientific temper will produce technology that can be disastrous to the human race.  We are already witnessing the terrifying misuses of technology by people who never cared to understand science and the rational faculty that sustains it. 

In a recent book titled The Enlightenment: History of an Idea, author Vincenzo Ferrone argues that Enlightenment must be defended today as a tradition of critical thought rather than as a secular, political idea. Unless we learn once again to use our rational faculty, we are sure to land in a situation far worse than the human history ever witnessed.  Because we will have science as a weapon rather than as a way of understanding and enhancing life.  Weapons in the hands of people who don’t understand are the real threat we are faced with today.  One clear antidote is critical thinking.  Learning to question.  To question even the most persuasive speakers, the apparently charming ideologies, and even the sanctity portrayed on walls digital or concrete.


PS: I have not read Ferrone’s book.  Happened to read about it here.  The illustration is also adapted from the same site.

Comments

  1. I greatly appreciate the way you handle a subject, which sometimes is not tangible but a mere idea or just a shadow thereof!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One is bound to stick to shadows in a blog, Amit ji. :)
      Such is the nature of blogging up to now, at least. I'm sure it'll change. Changing already, I think.

      Delete
  2. As I understand, Enlightenment is neither an idea nor a process but an experience - a state of mindlessness. But I agree with the concept of using critical reasoning to get rid of prejudices, in the form of belief, to experience the present moment. Enlightenment means the understanding of paradoxical reality. It means to understand that you have to initially use thinking in order to get rid of thoughts to enter in no-thought zone later. To remain unattached doesn't mean detachment only but attachment & detachment simultaneously. To experience the unquestionable truth, you have to ask questions initially.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An experience is also a dynamic process, isn't it? Enlightenment is a state of mind, i'd say. A dynamic openness to new reality.

      Delete
    2. I'm not talking about spiritual enlightenment, by the way.

      Delete
  3. Enlightenment is a state of mind. What we get enlightened about, and how we put that enlightenment into practical use is what matters. While more people are getting enlightened by the day, whether that is making this world a better place to live in is anyone's guess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with you that learning to question leads to the search for convincing answers. I think that Enlightenment, described as a state of mind, has to be a incremental process as the mind forms its thoughts, ideas and perceptions based on experiences, observations as well as the ability to think critically.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This really makes sense. Use of science without scientific temperament is very dangerous.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When i heard in the movies 'Enlighten me,' i never thought it could have such deep a meaning and history behind it. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I may have to reiterate that I' m speaking here about the period in history which is known as Enlightenment and about the values it upheld. Not spiritual enlightenment.

      Delete
  7. With free thinkers under constant attack from zealots and the state machinery, the path to enlightmebt is fraught with threats.
    But it's a journey one must make despite all odds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There have always been people who dared to make the journey. The world is a better place because of them.

      Delete
  8. Questioning the persuasive speakers!! well, that looks like really difficult in today's time when channels are instructed not to entertain critics and opposition. But who cares in India when people are happy to be fed with dramas and nonsense..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are still people like you left in the country, Roohi. We can make the difference.

      Delete
  9. Hi Tomichan,

    I agree, each and every one of us can bring about change. And like you pointed out "Critical thinking" and "Questioning" are the key...I would like to add "the courage" to go forward and ask questions is what most of us need...

    Thanks for sharing another insightful article.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Science without scientific temper - that's a great way to describe the happenings presently. Your articles always provide the food for thought.... :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...