Skip to main content

How to revive a corpse


“A corpse can be revived,” says Frank Hunter to Andrew Crocker-Harris in Terence Rattigan’s one-act play, The Browning Version.

Andrew is a martyr because he refuses to assert himself where required.  He knows that his wife, Millie, is unfaithful to him.  In fact she enjoys taunting him by telling him about her affairs with his colleagues.  Andrew continues to tolerate her because he thinks divorcing her would be “another grave wrong” he would do to her.  What’s the other wrong he had done her?  Frank asks.  “To marry her,” answers Andrew.

Andrew and Millie are total mismatches.  Millie is sensuous and earthy.  Andrew is intellectual and ethereal.  “Two kinds of love,” Andrew explains.  “Worlds apart as I know now, though when I married her I didn’t think they were incompatible.”  Andrew wanted affection and companionship, the emotional delights of love.  Millie wanted the physical delights.  Andrew thought that the kind of love he required was superior and never imagined that the absence of physicality would drive it out altogether.  “A brilliant classical scholar” though he was in his own words, he “was woefully ignorant of the facts of life.”

He knows better now.  He knows that the incompatible love of both of them has turned to bitter hatred.

However, it is not merely the incompatibility of love that brought matters to a head.  Andrew had assumed the role of a martyr.  And no woman loves a martyr for her husband.

Andrew’s assessment of himself as a teacher shows how he has refused to take charge of himself.  He is a strict teacher.  He respects scholarliness.  He follows the rules meticulously.  In short, he can’t be a popular teacher.  So he “discovered an easy substitute for popularity.”  He converted his mannerisms and peculiarities into a joke for his students to laugh at.  The students “didn’t like me as a man, but they found me funny as a character, and you can teach more things by laughter than by earnestness.”  Andrew is aware of his terrible lack of the sense of humour. 

You can’t succeed for very long as a joke.  Eventually the protracted joke met with its natural fate.  Andrew was “not only not liked, but now positively disliked.”  He learns that he has been suffering from “a sickness of the soul.”

His soul’s sickness is precisely that he never asserted himself though he demanded from his students strict discipline and adherence to rules.  He never realised that the best discipline a teacher can get from his students is their respect.  And their love as far as that is functional between a teacher and students.

Andrew wanted people to recognise and appreciate his superiority.  He wanted his wife to accept his kind of love as far greater than her kind.  She chose to indulge herself with her husband’s colleagues instead.  Andrew wanted his students to respect his strictness and allegiance to rules.  Which adolescent student will ever do that?

So Andrew chose to be a victim.  A martyr.  Killed by other people’s insensitivity.  “You can’t hurt Andrew.  He’s dead.”  Millie says to Frank when he tells her that she was extremely insensitive in telling Andrew about a joke played on him by one of his students.  She is wrong, however.  Andrew is immensely hurt by what she did.  She deflated his ego thoroughly.  When your ego is deflated you see the reality more clearly.  Andrew realises that he is what he is.  There’s no need for anyone’s appreciation.  Let people do what they choose.  His duty is to be just himself.  And also assert that self where required.  So he makes a change to what the headmaster has planned in his farewell function.  And he tells his wife, “I don’t’ think either of us has the right to expect anything further from the other.”

When Frank told him that a corpse could be revived, Andrew’s response was, “I don’t believe in miracles.”  However, the miracle happens.  Andrew learns to assert himself.  To be himself.  And to let his wife understand that he is no more a corpse. 


PS. Terence Rattigan's play is set in a residential public school the kind of which where I worked for fourteen years in Delhi.  A year after that school in Delhi was bulldozed to smithereens by certain vested interests wearing religious masks, I reread Rattigan with a shot of naughtiness hurtling through my being.  Moreover, I've just completed teaching an extract from the play in the CBSE school where I'm currently continuing the job of teaching.  I take this opportunity to wish all my fellow-professionals a HAPPY TEACHER'S DAY.


Comments

  1. There is always a thing or two that I learn from you. Infact to be precise, it has become a routine to read your posts. Happy teacher's day, sir.... from a reader and a learner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm immensely pleased to have a reader like you. You are unique and hence destined to be fundamentally in search...

      Thanks for the wishes. I enjoy being a teacher.

      Delete
  2. The timing for you sharing this could not have been more relevant to me. As they say answers may come from all kinds of places. Thank you for writing this post.

    To miracles. Cheers.

    And a Happy Teacher's Day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the greeting.

      Happy that the post makes some particular sense to you.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Country where humour died

Humour died a thousand deaths in India after May 2014. The reason – let me put it as someone put it on X.  The stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra called a politician some names like ‘traitor’ which made his audience laugh because they misunderstood it as a joke. Kunal Kamra has to explain the joke now in a court of justice. I hope his judge won’t be caught with crores of rupees of black money in his store room . India itself is the biggest joke now. Our courts of justice are huge jokes. Our universities are. Our temples, our textbooks, even our markets. Let alone our Parliament. I’m studying the Ramayana these days in detail because I’ve joined an A-to-Z blog challenge and my theme is Ramayana, as I wrote already in an earlier post . In order to understand the culture behind Ramayana, I even took the trouble to brush up my little knowledge of Sanskrit by attending a brief course. For proof, here’s part of a lesson in my handwriting.  The last day taught me some subhashit...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

56-Inch Self-Image

The cover story of the latest issue of The Caravan [March 2025] is titled The Balakot Misdirection: How the Modi government drew political mileage out of military failure . The essay that runs to over 20 pages is a bold slap on the glowing cheek of India’s Prime Minister. The entire series of military actions taken by Narendra Modi against Pakistan, right from the surgical strike of 2016, turns out to be mere sham in this essay. War was used by all inefficient kings in the past in order to augment the patriotism of the citizens, particularly in times of trouble. For example, the Controller of the Exchequer taxed the citizens as much as he thought they could bear without violent protest and when he was wrong the King declared a war against a neighbouring country. Patriotism, nationalism, and religion – the best thing about these is that a king can use them all very effectively to control the citizens’ sentiments. Nowadays a lot of leaders emulate the ancient kings’ examples enviabl...

Violence and Leaders

The latest issue of India Today magazine studies what it calls India’s Gross Domestic Behaviour (GDB). India is all poised to be an economic superpower. But what about its civic sense? Very poor, that’s what the study has found. Can GDP numbers and infrastructure projects alone determine a country’s development? Obviously, no. Will India be a really ‘developed’ country by 2030 although it may be $7-trillion economy by then? Again, no is the answer. India’s civic behaviour leaves a lot, lot to be desired. Ironically, the brand ambassador state of the country, Uttar Pradesh, is the worst on most parameters: civic behaviour, public safety, gender attitudes, and discrimination of various types. And UP is governed by a monk!  India Today Is there any correlation between the behaviour of a people and the values and principles displayed by their leaders? This is the question that arose in my mind as I read the India Today story. I put the question to ChatGPT. “Yes,” pat came the ...