Skip to main content

Merry Christmas



People like the Buddha, the Christ and the Mahatma were acutely aware of the absurdity of human life and sought to bring more meaning to it. Their perspectives differed significantly from the ordinary man’s. They looked at life in substantially different ways, in other words.

Jesus’ focus was on love and compassion. He was born a Jew and the Jewish people were highly ritualistic and juridical. Jesus questioned that way of life which was plainly more absurd than the life of people who practised other religions which the Jews regarded as gentile and inferior.

Love is the ultimate foundation of Jesus’ teachings. That is diametrically opposed to the Jewish weltanschauung. The Jewish God was a whimsical entity characterised by jealousy, short temper, vindictiveness and a ridiculous share of frivolousness. He created the Paradise apparently only to drive out the human beings from it. He could ask Abraham to sacrifice his own son just to prove the authenticity of the latter’s love. He could send his people marching through a desert for 40 years in search of a Promised Land which in the end turned out to be a far cry from “a land of milk and honey”. As if the travails of the exodus were not enough, Yahweh gave them the Ten Commandments too on the way. Commandments play a vital role in Judaism.

Jesus sought to change that by focusing on love. He encouraged people to break the rules if love required that. When he raised the question, “Which of you, having a son or an ox that has fallen into a well on a Sabbath day, will not immediately pull him out?” he was dismantling one of the fundamental perspectives of Judaism. He replaced rubrics with love.

Jesus could easily forgive the adulteress precisely because of his love for fellow beings as well as his desire for others to practise that love. “Who among you has not committed a sin?” He asked the people who were anxious to follow the rule and stone the woman to death. Sin is a part of human existence, he knew. Every person has frailties and flaws. We need to come to terms with them and be ready to forgive others.

The basic message of Jesus is love and compassion. Eventually the various religions that came up in his name forgot that message. They chose to imprison Jesus in the tabernacle and build palaces and empires in his name.

Well-known Catholic theologian, Hans Kung, has wondered time and again whether Jesus is part of the Catholic Church at all. In his history of the Church, he asks: “But is this Christian church [Catholic church] which is so successful, this greatest and most powerful of Christian churches, right in appealing to Jesus?” Kung goes on to suggest that if Jesus returned to earth today he would have “become involved in dangerous conflicts” with the churches founded in his name.

Jesus was not at all interested in the kind of splendour and glory that the churches display today. He was interested in making man a better creature. He was interested in making the earth a better place. Love and compassion were his ways. Christmas will be meaningful only when that love and compassion find a way to the human heart once again.

Wish you a Merry Christmas, a meaningful Christmas.


Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers


Comments

  1. Absolutely true! This post strengthens my belief that it's never the religion, but some of the religious who are a blot on humanity.
    May the world come to their collective senses this Christmas and spread the light of love! Amen!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fantastic post . First time i read about Jesus so nice message he has given to the world but nowadays people are running to money instead of leaving love & compassion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. This malady has gripped almost all religions today.

      Delete
  3. Had we understood Jesus in correct perspective; we would have a better world full of smiles instead of missiles.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The success of the post is that it says what should be said! Nice read...Merry Christmas to you and your family too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad it struck a cord with you. Smiles instead of missiles:lovely phrase .

      Delete
  5. The true meaning of Christmas is lost in new age gifting, festive food hogging, festivity. The cheer and spirit of the Christmas is in spreading love and compassion. As rightly mentioned in the post, if Jesus was to be born again, he would have felt defeated at his purpose. I suppose its true for all the religions.
    Merry Christmas to you and your family Matheikal and a very happy new year ahead.
    ----
    New post at CanvaswithRainbow... The Connect

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anagha. Wish you too the joys and blessings of the season .

      Delete
  6. Nice message. Merry Christmas to you and family!

    ReplyDelete
  7. At a time, when love and compassion are losing values, Jesus's teaching should get more relevance, but the institutions of Christianity is making him irrelevant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Institutionalisation has done much damage to many good teachings. Another great teacher is required to redeem Christianity now!

      Delete
  8. Christ the Redeemer is so lost beyond redemption due to his followers. Jesus taught love and simplicity which are long forgotten by his followers. Wolf in the skins of sheeps is the right usage to describe them. I wish at every christmas if Jesus's teachings were brought into its meaning and life would be once again beautiful

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed life would be immensely beautiful if people actually followed the great teachings of people like Jesus. Instead we have religions shaped in their name, religions meant to exploit people.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...