Skip to main content

The Venerable Zero



Ancient India was a powerhouse of new concepts in mathematics and astronomy, asserts William Dalrymple’s new book, The Golden Road. India stood out most dramatically in scientific rather than spiritual ideas. Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister, wrote in his classic Discovery of India: “It is remarkable that the Indians, though apparently detached from life, were yet intensely curious about it, and this curiosity led them to science.” Why does the present prime minister of the country choose to highlight the religious contributions? Well, you know the answer.

While reading Dalrymple yesterday, I was reminded of a math prof I had for my graduation course. Baby was his first name and I can’t recall the surname. ‘Baby’ was a common name for men in Kerala of the mid-twentieth century. The present General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) is a 71-year-old Baby from Kerala.

Our Prof Baby was a middle-aged man who knew a lot more than mathematics. One day he delivered the keynote address of a seminar organised by the math department and impressed all of us with his views on zero and infinity, ancient India’s revolutionary contributions to math. But North India doesn’t seem to appreciate this contribution, he said, and I still remember it. “They call zero shunya, nothingness. We Malayalis call it pujyam, the venerable.”

Without zero, math couldn’t have progressed much. Far from being shunya, our sampujya (venerable) zero is everything for arithmetic. Without zero, our math would still be stuck in the stone age, counting sheep with pebbles. How would you distinguish 15 from 105 and 1005 without zero? How would you perform simple arithmetic operations like multiplication and division without zero? Imagine the ancient Roman, with all his great civilisation to assist, trying to divide LXXVIII by IX.

Algebra without zero is like Hamlet without the prince. Well, I don’t remember if Prof Baby brought the Prince of Denmark to our alma mater, St Albert’s college in Kochi. But I do remember quite much of his speech.

All those intriguing quadratic equations wouldn’t even exist without zero. And don’t even talk about limits and derivatives in calculus, which was Prof Baby’s pet paper, if I remember correctly. Without zero, my dear reader, Newton and Leibniz (developer of calculus) would have probably gone gardening or plucking apples.

And, Prof Baby went on: Infinity would just be impossible without zero. Infinity is both a mathematical and a philosophical leap from zero, a giant leap over all the possible and imaginary numbers. And who discovered infinity? Prof Baby paused dramatically. I can still feel those bated breaths of young mathematicians of the 1982-85 batch in a nondescript classroom of a college. “India did,” Prof Baby said passionately. Fervently.

Om purnamadah purnamidam

purnat purnamudachyate,

purnasya purnamadaya

purnamevavashishyate.

Om Shanti Shanti Shanti.

I couldn’t believe my ears. A mathematics prof who was Christian by faith was reciting a Vedic shloka to a heterogeneous group of undergrads who were trying to figure out the difference between differentiation and integration in elementary calculus.

There is infinity everywhere, Prof Baby went on to explain the sholka. Here, there, everywhere. Take away infinity from infinity, and infinity remains. If you add infinity to infinity, again infinity will remain. See, Prof Baby underscored, how mathematics meets philosophy and mysticism. “You are learning a divine subject,” he said with palpable pride.

I didn’t pursue math beyond graduation because I fell in love with Dostoevsky and Kazantzakis in the meanwhile. But Prof Baby remains in my memory as fresh as on that day of his unforgettable lecture on the venerability of zero.

Today, when I listen to people like my prime minister, I remember people like Prof Baby who knew how to blend various streams and religions and subjects and make us love them all. I am left with a deep longing for such people.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Ah, the invocation shloka of the Isavasya Upanishad... one of my personal favourites and one of the best for grappling with the 'all is one' concept. Also an excellent choice of Prof B for exanding understanding of infinite possibilities! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today very few people seem to take genuine interest in understanding anything deeply. Those who speak much are villains and the wise have withdrawn...

      Delete
  2. Yes... That is the Wonder that was India... I hope it is even today. The ability to see, live snd bring our harmony, within and through contradictions, live a Dialogue, through intense Dialectics.... To contemplate Infinity, as Fulness from and in Fulness. .. The Breath of Mystical Pluralism that can celebrate a Million Mutinies of Ideas and still in active and embracing tolerance, Myth as a cypher of Truth, ever being sought after... as an Infinite Experiments with Truth..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Infinity is a very intriguing concept in math and pure logic defines arithmetical operations with it as 'not defined'. Divinity cannot be defined! There's something divine about math. Could that be one reason why I strayed away from it,?

      Delete
    2. Infinity is a very intriguing concept in math and pure logic defines arithmetical operations with it as 'not defined'. Divinity cannot be defined! There's something divine about math. Could that be one reason why I strayed away from it,?

      Delete
    3. " You would not have sought me, unless I had already found you. " Pascal in Pensee, about his Enchantment with Infinity. As regards Infinity, your Straying away from it, is not a Straying.... An Enchantment. " You would not have strayed from me, unless you had already found me."

      Delete
    4. That's more mystical than infinity now! Pascal, of course, was of a :different level', as Gen Z puts it.

      Delete
    5. Actually the quote should have been, " I would not have strayed from you, unless you had been already running after me. "

      Delete
  3. Both zero and infinity are such fundamental concepts in mathematics. Of course, some people are more interested in their own power rather than the power of the intellect.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Today most people have very superficial knowledge and want to encash on it. Politics based on religion and philosophy of religion are two very different things.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...