Skip to main content

When Government erases the sindoor of its own women

India's Armed Forces hunting the Maoists


Recently India, particularly the media, celebrated two events: (1) the success of Operation Sindoor which was a quasi-war on Pakistan, and (2) the killing of the Maoist chief Nambala Keshava Rao and 27 of his warriors. Personally, I felt uneasy about both the celebrations. Neither of them is a victory, something within me kept whispering to me. They are both tragedies masquerading as victories in the history being fabricated by certain vested interests.

The truths about the Pak affair will come to light only much later. Perhaps, they may never see the light of day. This post is going to look at the second affair.

With the killing of the Maoists, especially its Supremo, Maoism in India is all set for its last rites. That is what excited the Indian media. I didn’t come across any TV channel or other significant media agency that probed the reality from the perspective of the Maoists.

I hasten to add that I don’t endorse any kind of violence at all, least of all insurgencies like what the Maoists led. This post is merely an attempt to perceive the other side of the reality, the side which neither the government nor the media wants us to see.

Maoism, ever since its origin in India in the 1960s, has been an attempt to resist the systemic oppressions faced by the marginalised communities, especially the tribal (Adivasi) populations in the forests and rural areas of a few states of the country. The gaping socio-economic inequality was just one of the problems faced by these people. In addition to that, their homelands were taken away from them in the name of development. Forestlands were handed over in rather shady deals to the corporate sector in the names of mines, industries, and infrastructure.

In the last 15 years alone, over 305,000 hectares of forestland was diverted by the government of India for so-called development, and given to the corporate sector. In 2022-23, a year in which India’s Prime Minister launched numerous environment programmes and projects such as Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) and Green Credit Programme, 17,381 hectares of forests were transferred to corporates. “The mindful and deliberate utilisation of resources” proclaimed in Mission LiFE turned out to be sheer mindless hypocrisy.

No less than 60 million people have been displaced from their homelands by the so-called development projects of Indian government. 40% of that 60 million are tribals in forestlands. And out of utter helplessness and frustration, some of those 40% became Maoists – to defend their very lives. Their livelihood, cultural practices and their very sustenance were all being snatched away by their own government. Were they to accept their decimation mutely? 

Arundhati Roy with some Maoists 

Arundhati Roy is one of the few vocal defenders of these tribal people. She has written and spoken voluminously about their issues. In one of her essays titled Walking with the Comrades, she states that the day the Indian Parliament adopted the Constitution of the country was “a tragic day for the tribal people.” Because that day the government became the custodian of tribal lands. The Constitution of India “criminalized a whole way of life,” in Roy’s words.

The government turned brutal by and by. In Roy’s eloquent words, “Having dispossessed and pushed them (the tribals) into a downward spiral of indigence, in a cruel sleight of hand, the government began to use their own penury against them. Each time it needed to displace a large population – for dams, irrigation projects, mines – it talked of ‘bringing tribals into the mainstream’ or of giving them ‘the fruits of modern development’.”

And development increasingly became the prerogative of the privileged in India. The government now has become a plutocracy wearing democracy’s motley coat.

Maoism will die. Soon. All opposition is dying in India. Soon India will have one King, one God, one language…

One caste? No, I bet.

The caste system will remain. In a new form. The new Brahmins are already wielding their power from their respective anchors. The latest killing of the Maoists is just one minor headline in their new history. The wives of those men who died wearing the uniform of a dream for a homeland lost the sindoor on their foreheads too. And that was erased by their own government!

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    It's dispicable. It's ethnic cleansing - but the wider world is ignorant of this occurrence. I agree with your opening 'discomfiture' about so called celebration... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ethnic cleansing has become a norm, it seems. There's always a justification too for it, like Hannah Arendt's banality of evil.

      Delete
  2. Tragedy lurks at every corner!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The real sleight of the State is to have taught a new Mother-tongue to the nation - that is mainstreaming Doublespeak and Obfuscation, as the Lingua Franca, where everything is post-truth, from Jal, Jameen, Jungle and Jindagi.. If the Sindoor of the wives of the Maoists has been obliterated by the State, the Sindoor taken off by the terrorists, stage-managed mercenaries, has been commodified by the state, in the godimedia, shall I say, 'prostituted' for harvesting political mileage. Doublespeak administered as unsuspecting Mother-tongue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You've put it as eloquently as Arundhati Roy would have put it.

      I can only say with Alan Paton, Cry my Country.

      Delete
  4. Thanks for having made space and time for the Msoists.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the Royesque Compliment. When I give voice to the voiceless, I find myself eloquent, like a Shaman. It comes over me... That the plight of the poor, orphaned by the State, like Father killing the son and mother beating her own tiny tot, to death, on the rocks, by the sea, did not escape you, shows that the humanum is welling up within you... The cynic in you is gracefully turning over into a protesting bard, calling forth the spirit in the spiritless conditions, giving heart to a heartless world (Marx).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too sense a lot of change in me. Thanks a ton for supporting that change and being with me on this new journey.

      Delete
  6. That's all very sad. "Progress"? Yeah, no. I wish people realized that once these ways of life are gone, they're gone. And we're richer with them than without them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's catastrophic now here in my country which is decimating the tribal people as well as their unique cultures.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Loving God and Hating People

Illustration by Gemini AI There are too many people, including in my extended family. who love God so much that other people have no place in their hearts. God fills their hearts. They go to church or other similar places every day and meet their God. I guess they do. But they return home from the place of worship only to pour out the venom in their hearts on those around them. When I’m vexed by such ‘religious’ people I consult Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov in which there are some characters who are acutely vexed by spiritual questions. Let me leave Ivan Karamazov to himself, as he has been discussed too much already. In Book II, Chapter 4 [ A lady of Little Faith ], a troubled woman comes to Father Zosima, the wise monk, and confesses her spiritual struggle. “I long to love God,” she says. She knows that she cannot love God without loving her fellow human beings, or at least doing some service to them. The truth is, she says, “I cannot bear people. The closer they ...