Skip to main content

Emergency - then and now

 


When Indira Gandhi imposed a draconian Emergency on India 50 years ago on this day (25 June), I had just completed the first train journey of my life and started an entirely different kind of life. I had just joined a seminary as what they call an ‘aspirant’. One of the notice boards of the seminary always displayed the front page of an English newspaper – The Indian Express, if I recall correctly. I was only beginning to read English publications and so the headlines about Emergency didn’t really catch my attention. Since no one discussed politics in the seminary, it took me all of six months to understand the severity of the situation in the country. When I was travelling back home for Christmas vacation, the posters on the roadsides caught my attention. That’s how I began to take note of what was happening in the name of Emergency.

A 15-year-old schoolboy doesn’t really understand the demise of democracy. It took me a few years and a lot of hindsight to realise the gravity of the atrocities perpetrated by people like Sanjay Gandhi (Indira’s son) on the common people, especially in the North Indian states. There was much censorship, apart from cruelties like forced sterilisation of men and women. ‘Shut up and do your work’ [Naavadakku Paniyedukku] was the rule in my state of Kerala. Anyone who dared to criticise the government even subtly was arrested. Some just vanished without a trace. 


The Emergency lasted nearly two years and did all possible damage it could to democracy. When the general elections were held in 1977, Indira Gandhi and her party lost pathetically. Kerala was one of the few states that voted her party in spite of the Emergency. Probably the people of Kerala liked the temporary eradication of corruption from the state’s government offices. For two years, the bureaucrats in the state really “shut up and did their work.” So, Emergency had a good side too!

Now, 50 years later, most Malayalam political periodicals carry numerous articles written by well-known writers of the state on Emergency. One thing I noticed about most of these articles is the comparison between Indira Gandhi’s declared Emergency and Narendra Modi’s undeclared Emergency. Most writers I read these days are of the opinion that Modi has strangulated democracy for all practical purposes.

What Modi has built up is a Hindu nation in which non-Hindus are being victimised not so subtly. All public institutions of the country including the judiciary and academia have been Hindu-ised, or more correctly Hindutva-ised. The media – print, visual as well as social – have become Modi’s sycophants. Absolute falsehoods are foisted on the nation masqueraded as supreme truths. If Indira Gandhi’s Emergency lasted only about two years, Modi’s Emergency has entered the eleventh year, as one writer said. If India returned to a fully functional democracy after Indira’s Emergency, Modi’s has transmuted India into a Hindu nation and any return seems unlikely.

Suppression of dissent is the biggest damage done by Modi to democracy. Journalists, activists, students, and opposition leaders are harassed, surveilled, arrested, or even charged under draconian laws like UAPA and sedition. Decision-making is extremely centralised. Personality cult and projection of the leader as infallible are reminiscent of Indira’s Emergency. There is no effective Opposition in the country. Many opposition MLAs and MPs have been coerced into switching sides through inducement or pressure in what came to be known as Operation Lotus.

The Deshabhimani’s (Marxist newspaper in Malayalam) headline on 26 June 1975 was ‘From Semi-Fascism to Full Fascism: Emergency Declared’. Today’s Deshabhimani has reproduced that page on the cover as if to remind us that we have more than ‘Full Fascism’ now in the country. 


x

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Travesty and tragedy are becoming the script of the world... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dessabhimani journalistic acumen in reproducing the 1975 Cover Page and Headlines says it all. And your insightfulness in reproducing it, sums up and carries forward, all what you intended to say and surplus... Yet, I hope in the sagacity of the Indian Janata to check even this undeclared and 'transmuted' democracy, if the last General Election Result was any of a portend!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indians may choose to vote a difference. But my fear is votes won't matter anymore by the time the next Lok Sabah election comes.

      Delete
  3. I had just moved on to grade 6 in school. I remember my father listening to the morning 8.10 news on the transistor. May be because of a very concerned look on his face, I asked him what happened? He told me that the Prime Minister had declared Emergency. He tried his best to explain to me what it meant. But I doubt I understood anything.
    The India of today is very different from the India of 1975. So, it's best not to compared the India of today and the India of 50 years ago.
    Also, when we judge history retrospectively, we must also factor in the context of those times. We are often tempted to transpose the past to the present, or judge the past with the context of the present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We can't understand the present without understanding the past. Our understanding of the past is partly shaped by our present.

      Delete
  4. It's amazing how much damage can be done in just two short years. As we're discovering ourselves over here.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...