Skip to main content

Emergency - then and now

 


When Indira Gandhi imposed a draconian Emergency on India 50 years ago on this day (25 June), I had just completed the first train journey of my life and started an entirely different kind of life. I had just joined a seminary as what they call an ‘aspirant’. One of the notice boards of the seminary always displayed the front page of an English newspaper – The Indian Express, if I recall correctly. I was only beginning to read English publications and so the headlines about Emergency didn’t really catch my attention. Since no one discussed politics in the seminary, it took me all of six months to understand the severity of the situation in the country. When I was travelling back home for Christmas vacation, the posters on the roadsides caught my attention. That’s how I began to take note of what was happening in the name of Emergency.

A 15-year-old schoolboy doesn’t really understand the demise of democracy. It took me a few years and a lot of hindsight to realise the gravity of the atrocities perpetrated by people like Sanjay Gandhi (Indira’s son) on the common people, especially in the North Indian states. There was much censorship, apart from cruelties like forced sterilisation of men and women. ‘Shut up and do your work’ [Naavadakku Paniyedukku] was the rule in my state of Kerala. Anyone who dared to criticise the government even subtly was arrested. Some just vanished without a trace. 


The Emergency lasted nearly two years and did all possible damage it could to democracy. When the general elections were held in 1977, Indira Gandhi and her party lost pathetically. Kerala was one of the few states that voted her party in spite of the Emergency. Probably the people of Kerala liked the temporary eradication of corruption from the state’s government offices. For two years, the bureaucrats in the state really “shut up and did their work.” So, Emergency had a good side too!

Now, 50 years later, most Malayalam political periodicals carry numerous articles written by well-known writers of the state on Emergency. One thing I noticed about most of these articles is the comparison between Indira Gandhi’s declared Emergency and Narendra Modi’s undeclared Emergency. Most writers I read these days are of the opinion that Modi has strangulated democracy for all practical purposes.

What Modi has built up is a Hindu nation in which non-Hindus are being victimised not so subtly. All public institutions of the country including the judiciary and academia have been Hindu-ised, or more correctly Hindutva-ised. The media – print, visual as well as social – have become Modi’s sycophants. Absolute falsehoods are foisted on the nation masqueraded as supreme truths. If Indira Gandhi’s Emergency lasted only about two years, Modi’s Emergency has entered the eleventh year, as one writer said. If India returned to a fully functional democracy after Indira’s Emergency, Modi’s has transmuted India into a Hindu nation and any return seems unlikely.

Suppression of dissent is the biggest damage done by Modi to democracy. Journalists, activists, students, and opposition leaders are harassed, surveilled, arrested, or even charged under draconian laws like UAPA and sedition. Decision-making is extremely centralised. Personality cult and projection of the leader as infallible are reminiscent of Indira’s Emergency. There is no effective Opposition in the country. Many opposition MLAs and MPs have been coerced into switching sides through inducement or pressure in what came to be known as Operation Lotus.

The Deshabhimani’s (Marxist newspaper in Malayalam) headline on 26 June 1975 was ‘From Semi-Fascism to Full Fascism: Emergency Declared’. Today’s Deshabhimani has reproduced that page on the cover as if to remind us that we have more than ‘Full Fascism’ now in the country. 


x

Labels:

Comments

  1. magiceyeJune 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM

    Impossible to dispute!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yamini MacLeanJune 25, 2025 at 11:57 AM

    Hari OM
    Travesty and tragedy are becoming the script of the world... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jose D. MaliekalJune 25, 2025 at 12:05 PM

    Dessabhimani journalistic acumen in reproducing the 1975 Cover Page and Headlines says it all. And your insightfulness in reproducing it, sums up and carries forward, all what you intended to say and surplus... Yet, I hope in the sagacity of the Indian Janata to check even this undeclared and 'transmuted' democracy, if the last General Election Result was any of a portend!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 25, 2025 at 7:23 PM

      Indians may choose to vote a difference. But my fear is votes won't matter anymore by the time the next Lok Sabah election comes.

      Delete
  4. Pradeep NairJune 25, 2025 at 11:22 PM

    I had just moved on to grade 6 in school. I remember my father listening to the morning 8.10 news on the transistor. May be because of a very concerned look on his face, I asked him what happened? He told me that the Prime Minister had declared Emergency. He tried his best to explain to me what it meant. But I doubt I understood anything.
    The India of today is very different from the India of 1975. So, it's best not to compared the India of today and the India of 50 years ago.
    Also, when we judge history retrospectively, we must also factor in the context of those times. We are often tempted to transpose the past to the present, or judge the past with the context of the present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 26, 2025 at 7:39 AM

      We can't understand the present without understanding the past. Our understanding of the past is partly shaped by our present.

      Delete
  5. Liz A.June 26, 2025 at 4:02 AM

    It's amazing how much damage can be done in just two short years. As we're discovering ourselves over here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. rupam sarmaJune 26, 2025 at 11:37 AM

    Well written

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...
7 comments
Read more

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...
6 comments
Read more

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...
12 comments
Read more

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...
8 comments
Read more