Skip to main content

Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers

 

Adrienne Rich [1929-2012]

This is the last of a three-part series on gender discrimination. The first two parts [Women in Indian Democracy and Gender bias in a land of goddesses] touched upon certain aspects of the discrimination in India. This concluding part looks at the issue from a wider perspective with a feminist poem as the substratum.

Adrienne Rich’s poem Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers presents an old lady who has been oppressed by a patriarchal system. She is an unhappy wife and hence, obviously, an unhappy woman. Her discontentment is caused by her husband who put the “massive weight” of the wedding ring on Aunt’s finger. From the day that ring was slipped on, Aunt has been “mastered” by “ordeals”.

The poem was written in 1951. America, Rich’s country, wasn’t quite progressive yet in those days especially in matters related to women’s liberties. All women were expected to marry soon after school and live a life of subordination.  Even a faint suggestion of divorce would be frowned upon. [It’s quite a different matter that Adriene Rich was a divorcee and her husband of 17 years, a Harvard-trained economist, was driven to suicide by the separation.]

The tigers in the poem mentioned above are creations of Aunt Jennifer on a “screen” that she is knitting. The tigers are brave, self-assured and energetic. Aunt is the exact opposite of all that. She is terrified, despondent and enervated.

The tigers represent what Aunt Jennifer would like to have been. The tigers belong to her heart. They are still prancing there wildly. They are caged there, however.  By an insensitive patriarchal system. And they will continue to be caged within the Aunt’s heart until her death. Even when she lies dead in her coffin, that wedding ring will be there on her finger as a symbol of all the ordeals she endured in her married life.

To release the tigers within oneself is the ultimate meaning of personal freedom. This was the last thing that a woman in the America of the 1950s could do. As hinted earlier, every woman was expected to marry soon after school. Getting a husband was more important for a woman in those days than getting a college degree or a job. Even the media focused on a woman’s role in the home. If a woman wasn’t engaged or married by her early twenties, she was in danger of becoming an ‘old maid’. Those women who chose employment over marriage were considered selfish, putting themselves before the needs of their family.  

“A thinking woman sleeps with monsters,” Adrienne Rich wrote in another poem. Marriage wrecks the thinking woman, kills the tigers in her heart.

Unlike Adrienne Rich, Aunt Jennifer endured the massacre of her personal tigers, the suffocation of her soul.

Which is better? Aunt Jennifer’s endurance or Adriene Rich’s emancipation?

Personal freedom is important. No one should have to live a life that is surrendered to another individual. If marriage doesn’t let you live your life with an optimum degree of personal freedom, it is better to get out of that bondage. Marriage is not bondage; it is a bonding. It should help both the partners to grow into the fullness of themselves.

But that growth demands certain sacrifices from both the husband and the wife. Absolute personal freedom is impossible in any relationship. If you want absolute personal freedom, don’t marry. Live your life as you choose without bringing another individual into it. “I feel more helpless with you than without you,” Adrienne Rich wrote somewhere. That’s the problem. Marriage and every such close relationship is meant to empower you further, not to make you fell more helpless. If it does make you feel helpless, check whether you are in the wrong place before blaming the other person.

I accept the basic tenets of feminism. Personal freedom is of vital importance to both man and woman. Life without personal freedom is sheer slavery. But we need to remind ourselves that our inner tigers can be potential monsters to our partner. It is not only a thinking woman that sleeps with monsters. A thinking man does too.



PS. ‘This post is part of #CauseAChatter with blogchatter #gendertalks

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Another excellent post (and yesterday's). Sadly, even though the west has definitely made inroads, there is still much inequality between the genders and, also, a great deal of misunderstanding of what makes a working and worthy relationship - as opposed to Hallmark Romanticism...

    I have two links I hope you don't mind me sharing today. First, on the subject of marriage and tigers in the heart, I found this lady's tale to be inspirational.

    The second is off-topic, but important. It is to my own article on a subject that anyone with an online presence ought to consider - our digital legacy and managing it. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was great to know that Chinese lady. Coincidentally, one of my dreams was to travel and travel in the retirement stage. Instead Covid has kept me unretired and motionless. The good part is that I have retained the job and the bad part is that travel possibilities seem remote.

      Thanks for reminding me about the digital legacy and its potential problems.

      Delete
  2. This post made me think, especially when presented the point of view of the thinking man. Truly, absolute personal freedom is difficult when you are in a relationship. But both partners can come to an understanding on which tigers to unleash.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, which tigers can be unleashed and which to be caged... That's where the success of relationship lies.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I won’t vote

From Deshabhimani , Malayalam weekly Exactly a month from today is the Parliamentary election in my state of Kerala. This time, I’m not going to vote. Bernard Shaw defined democracy , with his characteristic cynicism, as “ a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve .” We elect our government in a democracy. And the government invariably sucks our blood – whichever the party is. The BJP and the Congress are like Tweedledum and Tweedledee though the former makes all sorts of other claims day in and day out. BJP = Congress + the holy cow. The holy cow has turned out to be quite a vampire and that makes a difference, no doubt. In our Prime Minister’s algebra, it is: (a+b) 2 which should be equal to a 2 and b 2 . There is an extra 2ab which is the holy cow. In George Orwell’s Animal Farm , the animals revolt against the human master and set up their own nationalist republic. Soon politics develops in the republic and some pigs become leaders. The porcine

Prelude to AtoZ

  From Garden of 5 Senses, Delhi [file pic] Hindsight gives an unearthly charm and order to the past. There can be pain too. A lot of things could have been different, much better, if only we possessed the wisdom of our old age back in those days. As a writer put it, Oedipus, Hamlet, Lear and a lot of those guys must have thought, “I wish I had known this some time ago.” Life is a series of errors with intermittent achievements. The only usefulness of the errors may be the lessons they teach us. Probably, that is their purpose too. We are created to err so that we learn, I dare to put it that way. I turn 64 in a month’s time. It’s not inappropriate to look back at some of the people whom life brought into my life so that I would learn certain lessons. No, I don’t mean to say that life has any such purpose or design or anything. Life is absurd. People come into your life as haphazardly as vehicles ply on your road or birds poop on your head. Some of these people change the chemist

How Arvind Kejriwal can save himself

Narendra Modi and Amit Shah have a clear vision. Eliminate all opposition. Decimate them or absorb them. My previous post [link below] showed a few people decimated by them. Today let’s look at the others: those who are saved by joining the Bharatiya Janata Party [BJP]. 1. Himanta Biswa Sarma  This guy was in Congress and faced serious charges related to the multi-crore Saradha chit fund scam. He also faced corruption charges related to drinking water supply in Guwahati. His house was raided by the Central Bureau of Investigation [CBI]. Then he switched over to BJP and all his crimes just vanished. It’s as simple as taking a dip in the Ganga and all your sins are forgiven. Today he is the chief minister of Assam. Nothing is heard of all the charges that were levelled against him. 2. Amarinder Singh  This former Captain in the Indian Army was a Congressman until Modi’s Enforcement Directorate [ED] started raiding him, his son and his son-in-law. He put an end to all those raid

The Good Old World

Book Review Title: Dukhi Dadiba and irony of fate Author: Dadi Edulji Taraporewala Translators: Aban Mukherji and Tulsi Vatsal Publisher: Ratna Books, Delhi, 2023 Pages: 314 If you want to return to the good old days of the late 19 th century, this is an ideal novel for you. This was published originally in Gujarati in 1913. It appeared as a serial before that from 1898 onwards in a periodical. The conflict between good and evil is the dominant motif though there is romance, betrayal, disappointment, regret, and pretty much of traditional morality. Reading this novel is quite like watching an old Bollywood movie, 1960s style. Ardeshir Bahadurshah, a wealthy Parsi aristocrat in Surat, dies having obligated his son Jehangir to find out his long-lost brother Rustom. Rustom was Bahadurshah’s son in his first marriage. The mother died when the boy was too small and the nurse who looked after the child vanished with it one day. Ratanmai, Bahadurshah’s present wife, takes her

The Blindness of Superficiality

An Essay on Anees Salim’s novel The Blind Lady’s Descendants Superficiality is a deadly human vice though most people seldom realise it. It is easy to live on the surface of everything from one’s profession to religion. Anees Salim’s novel, The Blind Lady’s Descendants , tells us a story of superficiality as lived by quite many people. Amar, the protagonist of the novel, is 26 when he thinks that life is not worth living. He became an atheist at the age of 13. He had become a half-Muslim at the age of 5 when his little penis was circumcised partly since he ran away in pain during the process. Amar’s atheism, however, is as superficial as most believers’ religion is. What initiated little Amar to atheism is “Dr Ibrahim’s farting fit.” Islamic prayer has to follow many a rule. “If you break wind during namaaz, you break a big rule, and you are to discontinue the prayer then and there, with no second thoughts.” Little Amar was unable to control his giggles as Dr Ibrahim struggled to