Skip to main content

Gilead: A Christian Novel

 


Book Review

This novel consists of the reflections of a 76-year-old Congregationalist minister (a Christian priest, for those who are not familiar with the Christian denominations). His days are numbered due to an illness, and he wants to leave something by which his 7-year-old son will remember him when the latter grows up. This novel is his diary written for his son.

John Ames, the minister, was born in 1880. His life has been a witness to the essentially tragic nature of human life: “the droughts and the influenza and the Depression and three terrible wars.” How do we make sense of so much evil? John Ames has been delivering sermons every week for 45 years to help people discover not just meaning but the very joy and beauty of life. He has kept the texts of all those sermons which would be equal to some 225 books – “which puts (him) up there with Augustine and Calvin for quantity.” He wrote all of them “in the deepest hope and conviction.” But today, when he looks back at them as an old man, he is not sure of their worth. He would like his wife to burn them after his death.

No, he is not denying anything of what he preached. He is a firm believer in God’s love and justice. His sermons have tried to convey that love and justice and hence they are valid at any time. But “the sacred beauty of Creation becomes dazzlingly apparent” when we feel our moral insufficiency to the world and when we feel the world’s moral insufficiency. There is something insufficient in his sermons, obviously.

The novel is a profound contemplation on human life rooted firmly in the Bible and Christian theology. But the atheist-philosopher Feuerbach also appears intermittently with his cheerfulness. John Ames loves Feuerbach so much that his wife wanted to name their cat after the philosopher.

There is much philosophy too in the novel. But theology overrides everything else. Jesus asked his followers to be like children. What did he mean? “I take Him to mean,” says John Ames, “you must be stripped of all the accretions of smugness and pretense and triviality.” The reader will come across such questions and answers again and again. For the non-believer, it is philosophy. For Ames, it is theology.

What makes the book a novel rather than a book of meditation are its fascinating characters like Ames’s father and grandfather, both ministers themselves. One was a pacifist and the other an abolitionist. The grandfather had lost an eye during the Civil War and he stares right into your heart with the one eye that is left. The father is an equally domineering character.

Marilynne Robinson

 The villainous character, however, is Jack Boughton who was named after John Ames. Jack’s real name is John Ames Boughton. But he is the reverse of the minister. He does not believe in God. “I don’t even believe God doesn’t exist,” he says. What makes him a villain is not his disbelief but the hollowness of his character, his inability to love, inability to discover the joy of existence. But the novel leaves him with the promise of redemption.

Redemption of the human soul is the central concern of the novel. Divine grace plays a central role in that process, according to the novel’s worldview. Like love and forgiveness, divine grace too is a gift that some people receive and some don’t. The prodigal son was forgiven though he had not expressed repentance for the grief he caused to his father. The father’s forgiveness is a gift. Like the divine grace. We should forgive others too. It is then that we become God’s collaborators and also “restore ourselves to ourselves.”

Love, joy of life, forgiveness… Such themes which draw their sustenance from the Bible and Calvin make the novel highly religious. Those who can appreciate that aspect will find this a highly rewarding book. The diction has the tang of a soothing breeze. That is a bonus.

I bought this book after seeing it listed among the 100 best novels of the 21st century by both The Guardian and the BBC. It is also one of the favourites of Barack Obama. It also won the Pulitzer Prize in 2005, the year after its publication.

Comments

  1. Literature tells us, what to do, and what not to do, as it mirrors life. It has an aesthetic and ecosophical imperative, hidden within it. Aestethetic means at the level of contemplation, not on proof or disproof. Ecosophical, as Raimundo Panikkar would say, is about listening to the wisdom of the Mother Earth, beyond the ecological, which is about the human pretensions about how the Earth and our presumed knowledge about her. I gather that Robinson is about the aesthetic and the ecosophic... a-la the good pastor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Robinson certainly is a wise writer and her wisdom comes from her religion. But to a non-Christian reader, the book can appear tedious with too many allusions to the Bible and Christian theology.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Not a book that I would look at, probably - though it seems from, what you say that it explores quite deeply, albeit pretty much only within one particular faith system. Thanks for the precis, though. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book is a good read, no doubt. The religion in it notwithstanding, the novel can delight us with its sparkling insights into life.

      Delete
  3. Looks like an interesting book that discusses important aspects of the meaning and growth in life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seems like an interesting read, adding to my list

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r