Skip to main content

Gilead: A Christian Novel

 


Book Review

This novel consists of the reflections of a 76-year-old Congregationalist minister (a Christian priest, for those who are not familiar with the Christian denominations). His days are numbered due to an illness, and he wants to leave something by which his 7-year-old son will remember him when the latter grows up. This novel is his diary written for his son.

John Ames, the minister, was born in 1880. His life has been a witness to the essentially tragic nature of human life: “the droughts and the influenza and the Depression and three terrible wars.” How do we make sense of so much evil? John Ames has been delivering sermons every week for 45 years to help people discover not just meaning but the very joy and beauty of life. He has kept the texts of all those sermons which would be equal to some 225 books – “which puts (him) up there with Augustine and Calvin for quantity.” He wrote all of them “in the deepest hope and conviction.” But today, when he looks back at them as an old man, he is not sure of their worth. He would like his wife to burn them after his death.

No, he is not denying anything of what he preached. He is a firm believer in God’s love and justice. His sermons have tried to convey that love and justice and hence they are valid at any time. But “the sacred beauty of Creation becomes dazzlingly apparent” when we feel our moral insufficiency to the world and when we feel the world’s moral insufficiency. There is something insufficient in his sermons, obviously.

The novel is a profound contemplation on human life rooted firmly in the Bible and Christian theology. But the atheist-philosopher Feuerbach also appears intermittently with his cheerfulness. John Ames loves Feuerbach so much that his wife wanted to name their cat after the philosopher.

There is much philosophy too in the novel. But theology overrides everything else. Jesus asked his followers to be like children. What did he mean? “I take Him to mean,” says John Ames, “you must be stripped of all the accretions of smugness and pretense and triviality.” The reader will come across such questions and answers again and again. For the non-believer, it is philosophy. For Ames, it is theology.

What makes the book a novel rather than a book of meditation are its fascinating characters like Ames’s father and grandfather, both ministers themselves. One was a pacifist and the other an abolitionist. The grandfather had lost an eye during the Civil War and he stares right into your heart with the one eye that is left. The father is an equally domineering character.

Marilynne Robinson

 The villainous character, however, is Jack Boughton who was named after John Ames. Jack’s real name is John Ames Boughton. But he is the reverse of the minister. He does not believe in God. “I don’t even believe God doesn’t exist,” he says. What makes him a villain is not his disbelief but the hollowness of his character, his inability to love, inability to discover the joy of existence. But the novel leaves him with the promise of redemption.

Redemption of the human soul is the central concern of the novel. Divine grace plays a central role in that process, according to the novel’s worldview. Like love and forgiveness, divine grace too is a gift that some people receive and some don’t. The prodigal son was forgiven though he had not expressed repentance for the grief he caused to his father. The father’s forgiveness is a gift. Like the divine grace. We should forgive others too. It is then that we become God’s collaborators and also “restore ourselves to ourselves.”

Love, joy of life, forgiveness… Such themes which draw their sustenance from the Bible and Calvin make the novel highly religious. Those who can appreciate that aspect will find this a highly rewarding book. The diction has the tang of a soothing breeze. That is a bonus.

I bought this book after seeing it listed among the 100 best novels of the 21st century by both The Guardian and the BBC. It is also one of the favourites of Barack Obama. It also won the Pulitzer Prize in 2005, the year after its publication.

Comments

  1. Literature tells us, what to do, and what not to do, as it mirrors life. It has an aesthetic and ecosophical imperative, hidden within it. Aestethetic means at the level of contemplation, not on proof or disproof. Ecosophical, as Raimundo Panikkar would say, is about listening to the wisdom of the Mother Earth, beyond the ecological, which is about the human pretensions about how the Earth and our presumed knowledge about her. I gather that Robinson is about the aesthetic and the ecosophic... a-la the good pastor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Robinson certainly is a wise writer and her wisdom comes from her religion. But to a non-Christian reader, the book can appear tedious with too many allusions to the Bible and Christian theology.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Not a book that I would look at, probably - though it seems from, what you say that it explores quite deeply, albeit pretty much only within one particular faith system. Thanks for the precis, though. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book is a good read, no doubt. The religion in it notwithstanding, the novel can delight us with its sparkling insights into life.

      Delete
  3. Looks like an interesting book that discusses important aspects of the meaning and growth in life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seems like an interesting read, adding to my list

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...