“Devil is the arrogance of the spirit, faith without
smile, truth that is never seized by doubt,” says William to Jorge. William and
Jorge are respectively the protagonist and the antagonist of Umberto Eco’s
novel, The Name of the Rose, which sold over 50 million copies
since its publication in 1983. The original was published in Italian in 1980. William
and Jorge are both Catholic monks. One is a hero and the other is a villain. You
can be a hero or a villain irrespective of the system you belong to. The
problem is not with the system but with you. That is the quintessential message
of Eco’s novel.
The novel begins with the journey of
William and his young disciple Adso to an abbey in Italy in Nov 1327. William
is a monk and Adso is a novice. They belong to two different congregations: Franciscans
and Benedictines respectively. It was the time when Pope John XXII and King
Louis IV were at loggerheads with each other and the Franciscans had the
support of the king while the Benedictines chose to kiss the Pope’s ring.
William’s journey to the abbey has something to do with this Pope-King
conflict.
But that conflict is relegated to the
background when a series of deaths takes place in the abbey. No less than five
monks are found dead in the abbey one by one under very mysterious
circumstances all of which find associations with the Antichrist of the
biblical Revelation in Jorge’s interpretation. William’s shrewd mind is
determined to find out the truth about the deaths/murders. William was an
Inquisitor of the Catholic Church until he realised the folly and villainy of
Inquisition.
The Pope’s delegate who comes to solve
the current problem between the King and the Pope is a leading Inquisitor. He
doesn’t solve the problem. Instead, he finds three individuals to be burnt at the
stake: two monks who became monks out of poverty and a village girl who gratified
the lust of the monks out of poverty. The Church never understands poverty or
any issue of the common people. As long as the Church can burn someone at the
stake and thus assert its authority, it is contended. “Bernard (the Inquisitor)
is interested, not in discovering the guilty, but in burning the accused,” as
William tells Adso. William is not interested in witch-hunt, however. He will
prove what is actually wrong with the whole system. That is what this novel is
about.
“You are the Devil,” William tells
Bernard, the Pope’s representative. The Catholic Church was a diabolic
institution in the medieval period. Eco’s novel shows how it behaved like a
devil rather than a spiritual enterprise. It had no heart. And no brain,
either. It had power. It lusted after power. The deadliest lust is not sex. In
fact, sex can be an ecstasy as Adso realises during his intercourse with the
girl who later is burned at the stake as a heretic for earning her bread by
selling her body to the monks. Woman is the source of too many evils in the scriptures
of the Semitic religions.
Happiness is evil, according to Jorge
and most other monks. Did Jesus ever smile? Did Jesus laugh? The novel has some
interesting discussions on that. The issue is quite serious. Murderous, in
fact. I don’t want to bring in spoilers for those who would like to read the
novel now.
This is the third time I’m reading
this novel. I read it first in the late 1980s when its English translation was available
in India. My second
reading was when my school in Delhi was under siege due to the greed of a
religious organisation called Radha Soami
Satsang Beas [RSSB]. RSSB has always reminded me of medieval Christianity. If
you visit their headquarters in Beas, Punjab, you may be reminded of the abbey
in this novel in spite of many differences. Differences are superficial. The
spirit is diabolic. Faith without smile. Truth without doubt.
Those who love mankind must make
people laugh at the truth, says William. What is truth? Is it what the
evangelists preach in Bible Conventions? Is it what the godmen and godwomen
preach from their perches in quirky ashrams? What about the madrassas with
their straitjacket-truths? The devil is a product of piety, says Eco boldly in
the novel. “Fear prophets, Adso, and those prepared to die for the truth, for
as a rule they make many others die with them.”
I think this novel is still
relevant though it is not an easy read at all with its excesses of Latin,
theology, history, and philosophy. But it has plenty of suspense. It is a
thriller with a difference. Something that today’s thriller writers must read
to understand how thrillers can be good literature too. Something that today’s
patriots must read to know that their truths, like anybody’s truths, are never absolute.
Something that cynics like me must read to remind themselves that there should
be tenderness even in the hearts of intellectuals.
Hari OM
ReplyDeleteI too have read this novel more than once - though not, now, for about a decade. Your reminder of it is a fine prompt! YAM xx
Glad to have provoked you 😊
DeleteNice...Thriller set in a unusual ambience.
ReplyDeleteIt sold over 50 million copies.
Delete