Skip to main content

Liberating Hyderabad

Book Review

Title: Hyderabad

Author: Manreet Sodhi Someshwar

Publisher: Harper Collins, 2022

The last Nizam of Hyderabad was the world’s richest individual of his time. The gold and jewels he owned would require trucks for transportation. If each person of his state “took one of a jewel or gem or pearl or gold bullion,” as this novel says, “how different would their life look!” But they wouldn’t storm the King Kothi Palace. They loved their king. Mir Osman Ali Khan, the last Nizam of Hyderabad, was loved by his people for many reasons.

He looked after the welfare of his people. In the words of this book, “Osman Ali Khan’s rule was a rule of progress and reform. Under his direct rule, the revenue department was reorganized, judicial reforms introduced, communal harmony cemented. He had founded Osmania University, Osmania General Hospital, the new high court, built dams… Wasn’t Hyderabad the first city in India with a reliable supply of drinking water? Hadn’t Nizam VII banned the slaughter of cows to assuage his Hindu subjects? Wasn’t primary school education free and compulsory? Clean trains that ran on time? Streets regularly washed by water tankers? Abundant public gardens…”

It was only natural that the Nizam wanted his State to be independent when India extracted its freedom from the colonial rule of the British. It was only natural that he commanded the support of a sizeable section of his subjects in that matter. It took more than a year for Nehru and Patel as well as a few others to convince the Nizam that Hyderabad could not be an independent state within the new country called India. This novel tells the poignant story of that struggle for Hyderabad.

This is the second in a trilogy. Lahore and Kashmir are the others in the series. History and fiction – the former being predominant – mingle seamlessly in this book. The conflict was not just between the new Indian government and the old princely state. There were the Communists with their own demands and undercover operations. There was the endless undercurrent of Hindu-Muslim conflict too. Much as the Nizam and heroic leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Nehru tried to sow the seeds of love in that hostile Hindu-Muslim field, the specter of hatred played out its macabre rhythm for years in India whose national epic is about a brutal war with ethical pretensions. The multidimensional (physical, ethical and spiritual) violence of the Mahabharata does not belong merely to the epic; it runs in the veins of India. It drank oceans of blood and remained hungry still. It extracted the ultimate sacrifice from the father of the nation. It continues to suck blood to this day.

Manreet Sodhi Someshwar’s narrative never tires of reminding us of that stream of violence which runs through the collective subconscious of the nation. The Communist rebels of Hyderabad dreamed of a state without this one form of violence at least. The Communist dreams were destined to be drowned in the bloodlust of religions.

It so happened that the Nehruvian concept of secularism saved India at that time. But the author of this book raises certain questions whose shadows lengthen to the contemporary India where secularism has become a bad word. What does being a Hindu in India mean? There are rich Hindus and poor Hindus. The exploitation of the latter by the former has continued in many ways. “Amongst poor Hindus,” reflects a character in the novel, “there were those like her friend Suguna, whom Jaabili could play with but never enter her house because Suguna’s father was a Brahmin, poor but upper caste. And what of the ‘wretched Malas and Madigas,’ her father would berate because they were untouchables?” Will a Reddy hug a Relli though both are Hindus? “Or a Balija, Idiga, Gouda, Kamma, Kapu, Uppara, Vadla…”

What is the color of the Indus: saffron or green? The river runs through a Muslim country and gives its name to a Hindu country. Does she, the Indus, have a choice? Does it have a religion?

One of the characters says, “The political existence of the Hindus in Hindustan depends on the success or failure of our dharmayuddha in Hyderabad. We must fight the Muslim oppression of centuries in a state run by a handful of Muslims.” Hyderabad was won in that yuddha by the majority. But the dharmayuddha does not seem to have ended. It continues today, as the country celebrates Azadi ka Amrit Mahotsav. The Mahabharata has no end, it seems.

Manreet Sodhi Someshwar’s novel ends with that reminder in the form of a question: “What was destroyed? What prevailed?” This novel make you think. Deeply. That is why I would recommend it to every Indian. Do read it. 


PS. This review is powered by Blogchatter Book Review Program.

Buy the book from Amazon.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    ...or even those of us with extended connections there? You're recommendation piques interest! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If India's present scenario was different, this book wouldn't have aroused me so much. This novel can throw some light on some of the false propaganda of our times.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Some insight into history and through it into the present.

      Delete
  3. This is such a nice review... enjoyed the book as well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not many of the present-day Harper Collins books achieve this standard.

      Delete
  4. Absolutely to the point review Sir , it is book worthy fo spending time with

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...