Skip to main content

War and Meaning of Victory


In the summer of 1999, while the rest of India was soaked in monsoon and Cricket World Cup, the country’s soldiers were clawing up frozen cliffs daring the bullets that came shooting from above. India’s incorrigible neighbour had sent its soldiers and militants to capture the snow-covered peaks of Kargil. It was an act of deception, a capture of India’s land stealthily. The terrain was harsh and hostile, testing the limits of human courage with every jagged step. The Kargil War was not just against a human enemy, but against peaks of stones and snow where the air itself was an adversary.

Three months of bitter conflict and subhuman killing ended in India’s victory over the invading Pakistan. Victory! July 26 is celebrated ever after as Kargil Vijay Diwas by India.

What is victory, however? Philosophically, I mean. We are supposed to be rational (philosophical) creatures, after all.

War does not determine who is right,” Bertrand Russell said famously, “but who is left.” Every victorious nation in a war boasts of killing so many hundreds or thousands of the enemy people across the border. Is killing fellow human beings victory? Of course, when they encroach upon our land, it is our duty to defend our property. But can we go beyond that sort of clannish thinking for a while? Remember we are rational creatures.  

“Peace cannot be kept by force,” as Albert Einstein, Russell’s illustrious and worthy contemporary, said. War is never a solution. War is a problem. Always. And it creates more problems. It is not a celebration of the Kargil victory that is called for on this anniversary of that horrendous conflict. It is a philosophical (yes, let us start using that dying faculty of ours) contemplation that we need to embark upon. That’s why I have invited Russell and Einstein here in this humble space.

Peace can only be achieved by understanding,” Einstein said. Education, dialogue, and empathy – Einstein advocated those for international peace. And education meant for him a lot more than what we are imparting in our schools and colleges these days. A lot, lot more.

India is now doing just the opposite of what Einstein suggested. India’s present government is stifling rational thinking by suffusing everything including mathematics with emotions like nationalism and parochial pride. While history classes now echo with hymns to Hindu glory, math lessons summon Aryabhata as if he were a foot soldier in a war for cultural supremacy.

“I want the new generation to come forward to scientifically prove the astronomical formulas in the scriptures of India, and to study them anew.” India’s Prime Minister said in no less scientific a place than ISRO [Indian Space Research Organisation] two years ago after the successful launch of Chandrayaan-3. He has made too many claims which are all founded on gross emotions masked as nationalist pride.

Such emotions don’t ever create peace. They create wars. As Russell said, wars are products of nationalism, fear, and greed.

Both Russell and Einstein together produced a Manifesto in 1955 whose spirit may be summarised in one sentence: “Remember your humanity, and forget the rest” [their own words in the Russell-Einstein Manifesto].

As we remember our great soldiers who sacrificed much, including their lives, on the merciless Kargil cliffs in 1999, let us also pause to ask what kind of world we are building on the peaks they won for us. Aren’t we forgetting our shared humanity – across borders, beyond flags? True victory lies not in reclaiming land, but in reclaiming the conscience of a nation.

PS. This post is a part of ‘Tricolour Tales Blog Hop’ hosted by Manali Desai and Sukaina Majeed under #EveryConversationMatters

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    All the leaders of the world just now could do to read your post and be reminded what those great minds brought forth... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. War sucks. And yet, nations keep doing them. Sigh. You're very right about how to look at this anniversary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We're more inclined to glorify war and our 'victory'.

      Delete
  3. Victory is meaningless when it is at the expense of humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you’ve just shifted the lens through which we view Kargil Diwas. Your post is a powerful reminder that true victory lies in reclaiming our humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A poignant impression of war. No one wins. I believe lives are lost by all and it’s irreversible. Once gone, lives are mourned by mothers, fathers, spouses, siblings, friends and children. Does it impact the man who commanded ‘Fire!’ On either side love and grief are the same.
    I dream of a world without conflicts. Just like you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's such a sane and holistic advice in the last paragraph. I wish everyone reads this blog atleast once.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is such a deep post sending reminder to all of us about the sacrifices of our soldiers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. A wonderful post on the futility of war and the significance of upholding humanity and service above everything. My husband was part of the Kargil war and the experience left an indelible impression on all our minds. We need to uphold the ideas of great thinkers like Einstein, Bertrand Russell and think about remembering our humanity and forgetting the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Such a deeper perspective of the humanity and the darkness that still haunts us till date. I wish more people talked about this!

    ReplyDelete
  10. How true is that! Such a powerful and thought-provoking read. Einstein’s quote especially struck a chord. It reminded me that patriotism, like victory, isn’t always loud or violent; sometimes, it’s simply choosing humanity over hate.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very thought provoking. Its so true that although we glorify war, what is the meaning of it in real...loss of so many innocent lives.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I appreciate how you weaved in Einstein and Russell to nudge us toward deeper reflection rather than empty celebration. Thank you, sir for reminding us that this victory and such wars so beyond just commemorating Kargil Vijay Diwas or other such, and that we need to reconsider what victory truly means—especially when true triumph might lie in preserving our shared humanity rather than flags or territory.

    ReplyDelete
  13. specifically the portion where you right about rationale and critical thinking. looking at some current scenarios I am increasingly realising it's easy to rule over people when they see or propgate black and white scenarios.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Truths of various colours

You have your truth and I have mine. There shouldn’t be a problem – until someone lies. Unfortunately, lying has been elevated as a virtue in present India. There are all sorts of truths, some of which are irrefutable. As a friend said the other day with a little frustration, the eternal truth is this: No matter how many times you check, the Wi-Fi will always run fastest when you don’t actually need it – and collapse the moment you’re about to hit Submit . Philosophers call it irony. Engineers call it Murphy’s Law. The rest of us just call it life. Life is impossible without countless such truths. Consider the following; ·       Change is inevitable. ·       Mortality is universal. ·       Actions have consequences. [Even if you may seem invincible, your karma will catch up, just wait.] ·       Water boils at 100 o C under normal atmospheric pressure. ·    ...

The Impact of Your Deed

Illustration by Copilot Designer Thirteen-year-old Briony makes a terrible mistake. She falsely accuses Robbie of raping Lola. Robbie is arrested. Cecilia is heartbroken. Briony herself regrets her act, but too late. All the painful harms have already been done. Atonement can be meaningless sometimes. Briony, Robbie, Cecilia, all belong to Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement (2001). Why did Briony make a false charge against Robbie? First of all, there was a serious misunderstanding. Briony presumed that Robbie’s romantic interest in Cecilia, Briony’s elder sister, was lust with a mask. Secondly, Briony was probably jealous of the relationship between her sister and Robbie. As a little child, Briony had jumped into a river merely to be saved by Robbie. When asked why she did such a dangerous thing, her answer was, “Because I love you.” Robbie is accused of raping Lola, Briony’s cousin. It was Paul Marshall who actually violated Lola, not once but twice. Briony did not see the man who r...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...