Skip to main content

Capital Punishment is not Revenge

Govindachamy when Kerala High Court confirmed his death sentence


The Bible suggests that it is better for one man to die if that death helps others to live better [John 11: 50]. Forgive me for applying that to a criminal today, though Jesus made that statement in a benign theological context.

A notorious and hardcore criminal has escaped prison in Kerala. Fourteen years ago he assaulted a young girl who was travelling all alone in a late evening train, going back home from her workplace. The girl jumped out of the running train to save herself from this beast. But he jumped after her and raped her. The postmortem report suggested that he raped her twice, the second being when she had already fallen unconscious. And then he killed her hitting her head with a stone.

Do you think that creature is human?

I wrote about this back then: A Drop of Tear For You, Soumya.

The people of Kerala demanded capital punishment for this creature, the brute called Govindachamy. He is inhuman. And he is a threat to civilised society. He is a threat to humanity. If the death of one creature is better for humanity, why not go ahead with that death?

Kerala’s court of justice ordered that death. But the Supreme Court commuted that to life sentence. Capital punishment is uncivilised, the apex court thought. Is it really?

The escape of Govindachamy from prison proves yet again that some people are irredeemable. Remember also that this man has only one arm. With that one arm, he committed brutal crimes. Now with that one hand again, he cut the bars of his prison cell and jumped a wall that is six metres (20 feet) tall.

It is possible that he got help from outside. There are more criminals outside our prisons than inside. Some of the men among the police are no better than the criminals behind the bars they guard.

It is good to clean up the society every now and then. It is better for the society that one Govindachamy dies…

… so that ‘normal’ people can live – with dignity, in peace.

Govindachamys do not merely break laws; they trample on the social contract that allows civilisation to function. It is not one Saumya that is killed by this Govindachamy; it is the very hope of mankind for a better society.

There is also another important question. Why should the state carry the burden of such a person for decades? This creature called Govindachamy lived in prison and all his expenditure from food and clothes to security was funded by the taxpayers.

Another more important question: the surviving family members of the victims. How do you convince them of justice when the murderer of their beloved family member is given a chance to escape to freedom from a prison with steel bars and 6-metre-tall walls?

Keeping some creatures alive is not compassion; it is cruelty to future victims and an insult to past ones. A prison escape by Govindachamy is not just a failure of the system; it is a betrayal of the idea that justice must mean what it promises to be. Capital punishment is not revenge, as I am told by many preachers. Capital punishment is about protecting the living and honouring the dead.

 

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    On this we must disagree... the bible verse pertains to sacrifice and not punishment. Another bible quote would advise that the lost sheep is the one requiring most care from the shepherd. If one's trust is in the teachings of Jesus then correction and forgiveness, the guidance to repentence is the apt response. If revenge is sought, look to the old books of Exodus, Leviticus...

    Undoubtedly the crime was heinous. Think on all the rapes that have - and continue to be - enacted. Murders too. Most go undetected, never mind unpunished. As dreadful as this fellow may be, why should he carry the force of hatred poured out from pained souls who will not be healed by his death. Grief has no salve - least of all by becoming the takers of life ourselves.

    The escape as you describe it (and his incapacity) must surely have been 'arranged' and this must be investigated. The very description means he will be easily spotted, unless, again, he is aided. Let all effort be in retrieving the criminal and placing him once again under the 'shepherds care'. Let him endure the restriction and rigors of incarceration until his natural death, just as those upon whom he wrought grief must carry that to their graves... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can only say that my insincts revolt against this kind of creatures. Call me what you will. I will defend death sentence to certain creatures.

      The god of the Bible is a lot more brutal. Sadist.

      Delete
  2. There would be people among the jail top brass abetting him. Otherwise, how would he escape? He seems another Charles Shobraj, of yesteryears. From. Which jail did he escape? As much as you would like him hanged, law has his leniencies and loopholes.. And higher judiciary is no great mood for capital punishment! And I checked the BNS to see whether Govindachami stands for any compounded punishment. Just another thee years more, perhaps after he is caught.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since he's got back, I don't know what to say about the complicity of the police. Could the whole thing be a drama created by certain powerful vested interests?

      Delete
    2. I presume even the rape and killing of Soumya, years back is part of a wider conspiracy and Govindachamy, just a facade and pawn and a cover-up. She would have spurned the overtures of some bigwig or his son, probably.

      Delete
    3. This is highly possible. And that bigwig may be behind this escape, though a failed attempt now.

      Delete
  3. What about the people who have climbed up the political ladder built with corpses!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a mystical question, almost. Give me power and I will clean up the entire Augean stables.

      Delete
  4. I've always had a problem with capital punishment. You can't take it back if there was a miscarriage of justice. And at least where I live, there are so many people slated to die who were actually innocent of the crimes they were convicted of. Death is a kind of release. If you want someone punished, better to keep them alive to do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The man in this post has been caught again. 14 years in prison didn't teach him anything. Another 14 won't either.

      Delete
  5. I have issue with capital punishment.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...