Skip to main content

Akbar the Brutal


When I was in school, I was taught that Akbar was a great emperor. ‘Akbar the Great’ was the title of the lesson on him. That was how the emperor was described in history in those days. Now the grade 8 history textbook calls that same man Akbar the Brutal.

A lot of efforts are being made to rewrite India’s history. All Muslims are evil in that new history. In fact, everyone except Hindus stands the chance of being accused of much evil.

It is sheer coincidence that I started reading Manu S Pillai’s new book, Gods, Guns and Missionaries, soon after reading newspaper reports about the alleged brutality of the Mughals. In the very first chapter, Pillai presents Akbar as a serious spiritual seeker as well as advocate of religious tolerance. Pillai’s knowledge of history is vast if the 218 pages of Notes in the book are any indication.

Chapter 1, titled ‘Monsters and Missionaries’, starts with three Jesuit missionaries led by Rodolfo Acquaviva visiting Akbar on a personal invitation. Akbar was interested in learning more about Christianity. He wore a European cloak and hat in deference to the three Italian monks who were his illustrious guests.

There were other guests as well. Brahmins, Jains, Zoroastrians, and others. As Akbar’s son Jahangir wrote later in Jahangirnama, Akbar was convinced that “all religions have a place within the spacious circle of God’s mercy.” Pillai’s book mentions that it was the Christian missionaries who had contempt for other religions and when they spoke crudely about Prophet Muhamad – “a diabolical name,” according to them – Akbar’s response was to take them out of the Ibadat Khana and remind them to “mind their language.”

Akbar received the volumes of the Bible with much reverence from the missionaries. He was particularly interested in the New Testament on which he showered more reverence. He got it translated into Persian.

Understanding that Akbar would never convert to Christianity in spite of his genuine interest in it, the missionaries left him to what they judged as his confused understanding of divinity, and went away though the emperor requested them to stay longer and teach him more about Jesus and his message.

Many Muslims were angry with these three missionaries for their blasphemous views on Islam and its practices such as polygamy. But the irony is that Acquaviva was eventually killed by a Hindu mob, and not a Muslim. And his crime was planting a cross on a broken Hindu temple in Goa.

When news of the brutal killing of the missionary reached Akbar, his lament was: “Did I not tell you not to go away? But you would not listen to me.”

Reducing that man, this Akbar, to a fraction of his multidimensional character, and that too in a textbook studied by 13-year-olds is more brutal, isn’t it?  

 x

Comments

  1. Demonising Islam and the Great Moghuls, especially Akbar, the Seeker, among them, that too to children, is not only brutal, but also boorish. As boorish as Aquaviva and his companions, who were blasphemous towards the Nabi. Overtriumphalism of the Christendom, at the dawn of Modernity. Did not know that Aquaviva and his bigotry had a gory end at Goa, at the hands of the Hindus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some Manu Pillai will be there in 2125 to tell the story of our present Emperor's bigotry, brutality, boorishness, hypocrisy, hollowness, falsehood...

      Delete
  2. Please read the Malabar Rites and Chinese Rites Controversy in the history of the Catholic Church and its impact on the later missionary trajectory of the Church.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was not much aware of these controversies until you drew my attention to them. I think the Vatican should stop imposing its preferences on everyone. Why not let people discover God in their own ways? This is where the whole conversion business including Ghar Vapsi becomes objectionable.

      Were the missionaries any better than the Mughals? Or the Brahmins with their caste system and mantras?

      Delete
  3. Extremely saddened about the manipulated version. Probably, they will hide the episode of Chanda Ashoka and retain only Dhamma Ashoka. Not able to imagine the consequences of children learning new history. My question: What are the teachers going to do now? At least they read the history that we knew!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Having been a teacher throughout my life, my answer to your question...

      Every teacher has a duty to uphold truth without prejudices and political affiliations. That requires both courage and wisdom.

      Tragedy: teachers are not even able to read these days. They're kept busy with clerical jobs like lesson plans and report cards.

      Delete
  4. Hari Om
    It's a tragedy, for sure, this tendency to "review" history... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I asked ChatGPT how history would view Modi after a century from now. The answer was it would depend on who is in power at that time. That's it.

      Delete
  5. It's honestly become a burning issue now. When NCERT first announced the changes in portions, people reacted and presented their views. But suddenly now, a few historians have started coming out, expressing their concerns and disagreement. I watched two shorts just yesterday—people are finally starting to speak up.
    The problem is, history is being twisted and painted in a language that suits certain narratives. What else can we expect when people sitting in positions of power—whether in the government or elsewhere—seem to be either willfully ignorant or heavily biased?
    It's not just about textbooks anymore. Hate is being spread systematically, in more subtle and deep-rooted ways. It's reaching young minds, shaping their worldview. They call it rewriting history, but in reality, it feels more like erasing inconvenient truths.
    What’s even more disturbing is that this rising hatred, if not checked, will be our undoing as a society. These people don’t appreciate the power and beauty of coexistence—because they know it threatens their entire ideology. Harmony means resistance to their agenda.
    And let’s talk about the teachers too. Sadly, many have become clerks—buried in paperwork and admin tasks. Some have lost the fire they once had for teaching. And the rest? Many have turned into blind followers who can’t—or won’t—see the value in presenting multiple perspectives. But that’s exactly what history should do: help us learn from the past, not repeat it.
    God bless the coming generations. They're going to need all the clarity, courage, and compassion they can get.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's more farcical than tragic, I feel. Because there's no profound ideology or any ideal governing this erasure of inconvenient truths, as you call it. It's only a power game being played out by a man who was discontented with his life in a nonexistent railway station's tea shop. A man who sees his boyhood as both victim and hero (remember the crocodile story). Just because of his over-inflated ego, a whole nation has been split into Hindus and Christians and Muslims. What Modi is doing to India feels less like a Greek tragedy and more like a circus run by a ringmaster obsessed with seeing his own face on every poster. It’s not national policy anymore—it’s personal branding with a side of drama.

      Delete
  6. Yes you are right. I too know Akbar as a great ruler and spirituality. History has always been rewritten by rulers to the detriment of what actually things were. Lamentable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's being done now is a terrible injustice to students, poisoning their minds with hatred.

      Delete
  7. The actual times were all so much more complicate than the history books would have us believe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's right. It's literature writers who get that complexity better in novels than historians.

      Delete
  8. Watch all popular Malayalam channels in Australia with good quality. Enjoy live news, movies, songs, and serials from Kerala. Stay connected to your language and culture with ease. The best Malayalam TV options are now available for Indian families in Australia.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

Are You Sane?

Illustration by Gemini AI A few months back, a clinical psychiatrist asked me whether anyone in my family ever suffered from insanity. “All of us are insane to some degree,” I wanted to tell her. But I didn’t because there was another family member with me. We had taken a youngster of the family for counselling. I had forgotten the above episode until something happened the other day which led me to write last post . The incident that prompted me to write that post brought down an elder of my family from the pedestal on which I had placed him simply because he is a very devout religious person who prays a lot and moves about in the society like the gentlest soul that ever lived in these not-so-gentle terrains. I also think that the severe flu which descended on me that night was partly a product of my disillusionment. The realisation that one’s religion and devotion that guided one for seven decades hadn’t touched one’s heart even a little bit was a rude shock to me. What does re...

Loving God and Hating People

Illustration by Gemini AI There are too many people, including in my extended family. who love God so much that other people have no place in their hearts. God fills their hearts. They go to church or other similar places every day and meet their God. I guess they do. But they return home from the place of worship only to pour out the venom in their hearts on those around them. When I’m vexed by such ‘religious’ people I consult Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov in which there are some characters who are acutely vexed by spiritual questions. Let me leave Ivan Karamazov to himself, as he has been discussed too much already. In Book II, Chapter 4 [ A lady of Little Faith ], a troubled woman comes to Father Zosima, the wise monk, and confesses her spiritual struggle. “I long to love God,” she says. She knows that she cannot love God without loving her fellow human beings, or at least doing some service to them. The truth is, she says, “I cannot bear people. The closer they ...