Skip to main content

War and Meaning of Victory


In the summer of 1999, while the rest of India was soaked in monsoon and Cricket World Cup, the country’s soldiers were clawing up frozen cliffs daring the bullets that came shooting from above. India’s incorrigible neighbour had sent its soldiers and militants to capture the snow-covered peaks of Kargil. It was an act of deception, a capture of India’s land stealthily. The terrain was harsh and hostile, testing the limits of human courage with every jagged step. The Kargil War was not just against a human enemy, but against peaks of stones and snow where the air itself was an adversary.

Three months of bitter conflict and subhuman killing ended in India’s victory over the invading Pakistan. Victory! July 26 is celebrated ever after as Kargil Vijay Diwas by India.

What is victory, however? Philosophically, I mean. We are supposed to be rational (philosophical) creatures, after all.

War does not determine who is right,” Bertrand Russell said famously, “but who is left.” Every victorious nation in a war boasts of killing so many hundreds or thousands of the enemy people across the border. Is killing fellow human beings victory? Of course, when they encroach upon our land, it is our duty to defend our property. But can we go beyond that sort of clannish thinking for a while? Remember we are rational creatures.  

“Peace cannot be kept by force,” as Albert Einstein, Russell’s illustrious and worthy contemporary, said. War is never a solution. War is a problem. Always. And it creates more problems. It is not a celebration of the Kargil victory that is called for on this anniversary of that horrendous conflict. It is a philosophical (yes, let us start using that dying faculty of ours) contemplation that we need to embark upon. That’s why I have invited Russell and Einstein here in this humble space.

Peace can only be achieved by understanding,” Einstein said. Education, dialogue, and empathy – Einstein advocated those for international peace. And education meant for him a lot more than what we are imparting in our schools and colleges these days. A lot, lot more.

India is now doing just the opposite of what Einstein suggested. India’s present government is stifling rational thinking by suffusing everything including mathematics with emotions like nationalism and parochial pride. While history classes now echo with hymns to Hindu glory, math lessons summon Aryabhata as if he were a foot soldier in a war for cultural supremacy.

“I want the new generation to come forward to scientifically prove the astronomical formulas in the scriptures of India, and to study them anew.” India’s Prime Minister said in no less scientific a place than ISRO [Indian Space Research Organisation] two years ago after the successful launch of Chandrayaan-3. He has made too many claims which are all founded on gross emotions masked as nationalist pride.

Such emotions don’t ever create peace. They create wars. As Russell said, wars are products of nationalism, fear, and greed.

Both Russell and Einstein together produced a Manifesto in 1955 whose spirit may be summarised in one sentence: “Remember your humanity, and forget the rest” [their own words in the Russell-Einstein Manifesto].

As we remember our great soldiers who sacrificed much, including their lives, on the merciless Kargil cliffs in 1999, let us also pause to ask what kind of world we are building on the peaks they won for us. Aren’t we forgetting our shared humanity – across borders, beyond flags? True victory lies not in reclaiming land, but in reclaiming the conscience of a nation.

PS. This post is a part of ‘Tricolour Tales Blog Hop’ hosted by Manali Desai and Sukaina Majeed under #EveryConversationMatters

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    All the leaders of the world just now could do to read your post and be reminded what those great minds brought forth... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. War sucks. And yet, nations keep doing them. Sigh. You're very right about how to look at this anniversary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We're more inclined to glorify war and our 'victory'.

      Delete
  3. Victory is meaningless when it is at the expense of humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you’ve just shifted the lens through which we view Kargil Diwas. Your post is a powerful reminder that true victory lies in reclaiming our humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A poignant impression of war. No one wins. I believe lives are lost by all and it’s irreversible. Once gone, lives are mourned by mothers, fathers, spouses, siblings, friends and children. Does it impact the man who commanded ‘Fire!’ On either side love and grief are the same.
    I dream of a world without conflicts. Just like you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's such a sane and holistic advice in the last paragraph. I wish everyone reads this blog atleast once.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is such a deep post sending reminder to all of us about the sacrifices of our soldiers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. A wonderful post on the futility of war and the significance of upholding humanity and service above everything. My husband was part of the Kargil war and the experience left an indelible impression on all our minds. We need to uphold the ideas of great thinkers like Einstein, Bertrand Russell and think about remembering our humanity and forgetting the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Such a deeper perspective of the humanity and the darkness that still haunts us till date. I wish more people talked about this!

    ReplyDelete
  10. How true is that! Such a powerful and thought-provoking read. Einstein’s quote especially struck a chord. It reminded me that patriotism, like victory, isn’t always loud or violent; sometimes, it’s simply choosing humanity over hate.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very thought provoking. Its so true that although we glorify war, what is the meaning of it in real...loss of so many innocent lives.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I appreciate how you weaved in Einstein and Russell to nudge us toward deeper reflection rather than empty celebration. Thank you, sir for reminding us that this victory and such wars so beyond just commemorating Kargil Vijay Diwas or other such, and that we need to reconsider what victory truly means—especially when true triumph might lie in preserving our shared humanity rather than flags or territory.

    ReplyDelete
  13. specifically the portion where you right about rationale and critical thinking. looking at some current scenarios I am increasingly realising it's easy to rule over people when they see or propgate black and white scenarios.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...