“Hindu khatare mein hai.” This was one of the
first slogans that accompanied the emergence of Narendra Modi on the national
scene. It means Hindus are in Danger. It reveals a deep-rooted feeling
of insecurity. Hindus constitute an overwhelming majority in India – 80%. All
the high positions in governance, judiciary, academics, any significant place,
are occupied by Hindus. Yet the slogan was born. Strange?
It will be facile to argue that Modi
used this slogan and its concomitant hatred of Muslims and Christians as a
political weapon for winning votes. True, he was successful in that; he rose to
the highest political post in the country using minority-bashing. But the
hatred did not end with that achievement; rather it spread outward and became
more exclusive. Muslim and European rulers of India were booted out from the
country’s history books and wherever else possible like the names of roads and
institutions. With vengeance. Now there is a concerted effort going on to place
India on top of the world, particularly of the godless West.
Exclusivism. That is what Hindutva
ultimately is about. And exclusivism always smacks of insecurity feelings.
Hinduism was always an inclusive
philosophy until some very insecure leaders hijacked it in the name of
Hindutva nationalism. The pre-Modi version of Hinduism was inclusive and there
were many attempts to attain an Indian version of what the West would call Enlightenment
in the late 19th century. That pre-Modi Hinduism treated various
philosophical schools of thought and religious traditions as not
erroneous or false but as falling short of the fulness of the ultimate truth
known only to the Advaitic tradition of Hinduism. In other words, pre-Modi
Hinduism was inclusive though condescendingly so.
That condescension had an air of
security which emerged from the intrinsic feeling that Hinduism was the supreme
religion because it was more philosophy than religion and it lent sanctity to
everything at least in theory.
Modi Inc has no such awareness and
hence their insecurity feeling. Such insecurity gives rise to hatred. Hatred
that rises from deep-rooted fear of the other. If you have ever paid attention
to the way Modi laughs when he meets leaders of Western countries, you will
understand how insecure, how inferior he feels before them. The paradox is that
this same man who expresses such camaraderie in the presence of those leaders in
their countries wants to “decolonise the Indian mind” by feeding Hindu sciences
and philosophy intravenously into all levels of education, from primary schools
to “centres of excellence” universities.
Modi’s public speeches, eloquent and
persuasive, are all emotive rather than intellectual. He dreams of taking India
to the position of the Viswaguru, Teacher of the World. That sounds very
inclusive: wanting to embrace the whole world. But Modi’s actions back home are
totally contradictory. The reason is clear enough by now, I hope. Modi has to
deal with his own insecurities first and foremost.
Inclusion is not just a social
affair. More than that, it is psychological. Its roots lie in feelings of
security. Only those who feel secure within themselves and within their
communities can truly be open-minded and accepting of others.
A person who feels safe does not see
differences as a threat. When individuals are confident in their own identity
and worth, they can afford to be generous with others. In contrast, exclusion
arises from fear: Hindu khatare mein hai. Fear leads one to hatred,
violence, exclusion. The psychology of inclusion, on the other hand, is marked
by confidence, empathy, and emotional maturity.
Inclusivism creates environments
where people can thrive without the burden of constant comparison or prejudice.
In such environments, diversity becomes a source of learning rather than
division. There is no question of One Religion, One Language, etc in
that environment. When you want everything to be just one – your
language, your religion, your food, your God – you are revealing the littleness
of your heart, your mind, your soul. Exclusivism is littleness.
Inclusion is not a favour done to the
minority or the marginalised. It is a psychological necessity for a healthy,
balanced society. The more secure individuals and communities become, the more
open they are to others. Openness, in turn, reinforces security. It engenders
an environment of trust, respect, and growth.
To conclude, inclusion is not just a
political goal or ideal. It is an inner discipline. It begins with feeling safe
in our own identities and extends outward in empathy to and acceptance of the
other.
PS. This post is a part
of ‘Currents of Kindness Blog Hop’ hosted by Manali Desai and Sukaina Majeed under
#EveryConversationMatters blog hop series.
Well articulated.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
DeleteWell articulated, yes. insecurity breeds hate and communalism. Also Enemy Construction.
ReplyDeleteVery concise summary of the post.
DeleteHari OM
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more! YAM xx