Skip to main content

Sex and Sin



Disclaimer: This is not a book review


The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin.

The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu. Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” In the Malayalam version, cause to stumble’ is ‘to give othappu’.

The protagonist of the novel Othappu, Margalitha is a young nun who feels drawn to a young priest, Father Roy Francis Karikkan. The attraction is a double sin. First of all, it is sexual. Secondly, Catholic nuns and priests should have no sexual desires; they are supposed to control them with asceticism.

Right from the first woman Eve, all women are evil simply because they lead men to sin. This is one of the beliefs of the Church. A preacher in Joseph’s novel says, “Sin originated in the world through a woman…. I have learnt that woman is more bitter than death. Her heart is a snare and her hands are chains. The man who pleases God will escape her. But the sinner will be trapped tragically.”

No woman in the preacher’s audience questions the view. Because the preacher is quoting the Bible [Ecclesiastes 7:26].

The body with its passions like lust is evil, according to the Church. You have to constantly strive to overcome those passions, overcome your body. Be a holy soul through austerity. Interestingly, the priests of the Church have ended up equating passion with sex; they eat gluttonously and enjoy luxurious lifestyles, the novel suggests more than once. But sex? No, never.

Karikkan, as Margalitha calls the young priest, is troubled by this body-soul conflict. He is drawn to Margalitha, a young and beautiful nun. But he knows that a woman’s heart is a snare and her hands are chains. He, a priest, a man of God, should save himself from the snare. The conflict drives him crazy. 

Illustration by Gemini AI

Both Karikkan and Margalitha abandon their religious vocation. But their society won’t accept them because that society is taught by their religion and its holy book that lust is a cardinal sin. The sinfulness becomes more severe when a priest and a nun are involved.

Margalitha has the courage to dare the society. Karikkan doesn’t. He abandons the pregnant Margalitha and goes to a faraway place to save his honour as well as soul by performing the penance of cleaning a churchyard daily with his bare palms. Karikkan is running away from himself, Margalitha tells him, because he is unable to rise above the indoctrination fed into his very being by his religion. His God had died on the cross. Karikkan is now nailing himself to a cross. Karikkan is rejecting one whole part of his being: his body.

Repression of a passion is never a solution. Karikkan could have remained a priest if he had learned to integrate his bodily impulses into his spirituality rather than viewing them as sinful. He could have transformed passion into compassion, which is what ‘successful’ religious people do. There are more priests who hit compromises and go on, like Father Daniel in the novel.

There are hints in Joseph’s novel that the Church should allow its priests to marry if they wish. Sexuality can be part of the sacred, why not? Karikkan is driven mad by his repression of a very integral part of his being: his intense sexuality. His final collapse is not just a personal fall: it symbolises a spiritual system that has lost harmony between body and soul.

Margalitha, on the other hand, refuses to suppress either. She embodies what Karikkan could not: a spirituality that embraces both eros and agape, the human and the divine.

Sex is not sin, in other words, in Sarah Joseph’s vision. Without the body, there is no life. You can’t just deny the body and be a whole person. Karikkan could have remained a priest only in a Church that recognised the holiness of the human body. The Catholic Church is not quite the place for him. Yet he clings to it because of his upbringing as well as deep guilt feelings over the suicide of his father. His father killed himself when the son left priesthood. A priest in the family, marked by poverty, is an honour. The father couldn’t live anymore with the dishonour of a son who left priesthood for lust, the most shameful evil. 

Clinging to a church to which his being doesn’t belong, Karikkan goes cranky. Abandoning that church, Margalitha redeems herself. If your religion doesn’t bring you internal harmony and peace, what use is it? Sex can be holy, Karikkan should realise, even by quitting his religion.  

PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon 2025

 

 

Comments

  1. This was a very deep read." Passion can be transformed to compassion. "

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Veiled Women

One of the controversies that has been raging in Kerala for quite some time now is about a girl student’s decision to wear the hijab to school. The school run by Christian nuns did not appreciate the girl’s choice of religious identity over the school uniform and punished her by making her stand outside the classroom. The matter was taken up immediately by a fundamentalist Muslim organisation (SDPI) which created the usual sound and fury on the campus as well as outside. Kerala is a liberal state in which Hindus (55%), Muslims (27%), and Christians (18%) have been living in fair though superficial harmony even after Modi’s BJP with its cantankerous exclusivism assumed power in Delhi. Maybe, Modi created much insecurity feeling among the Muslims in Kerala too resulting in some reactionary moves like the hijab mentioned above. The school could have handled it diplomatically given the general nature of Muslims which is not quite amenable to sense and sensibility. From the time I shi...

Insecurity and Exclusivism

“ Hindu khatare mein hai.” This was one of the first slogans that accompanied the emergence of Narendra Modi on the national scene. It means Hindus are in Danger . It reveals a deep-rooted feeling of insecurity. Hindus constitute an overwhelming majority in India – 80%. All the high positions in governance, judiciary, academics, any significant place, are occupied by Hindus. Yet the slogan was born. Strange? It will be facile to argue that Modi used this slogan and its concomitant hatred of Muslims and Christians as a political weapon for winning votes. True, he was successful in that; he rose to the highest political post in the country using minority-bashing. But the hatred did not end with that achievement; rather it spread outward and became more exclusive. Muslim and European rulers of India were booted out from the country’s history books and wherever else possible like the names of roads and institutions. With vengeance. Now there is a concerted effort going on to place In...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...