Skip to main content

Who’s afraid of conversions?

No conversion, only posing


The New Year witnessed some attacks on Christian churches in Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district. Religious conversion is said to be the reason. I came to know from a personal source that the problem started as a family feud and burgeoned into communal violence. Many such attacks on religious places happened in the past in India and many more will take place in future too. Because religion in this country is not about spirituality but about power and manipulations.

The most fundamental question that arises is whether we need religion at all. The answer is quite obvious. Very obvious to those who think clearly. If it is the spiritual meaning of life that you are seeking, religion may help but it is not the best means. Your personal enquiries and spiritual exercises will help you much better. Spirituality is a personal affair in the first place. Unless it touches your heart, it is not spirituality at all. Religion and its institutions may help you in the process of discovering and refining your heart. But the effort is all yours, absolutely personal. The hard truth is you don’t any institution for that. You need the will to do it. You need the courage to face your heart. The courage to face the god that resides in your heart.  And the demons as well – more than the god, in fact.

Secondly, is one religion better than another for your spiritual journey? I believe religion should be a purely personal choice. Though people often say that every religion teaches more or less the same things (to cultivate virtues and shun evil), I think religions have fundamental differences. The Semitic religions, for example, are quite different from most oriental religions like Hinduism in their theology, rituals and outlooks. It is possible that one Kamala Das finds Islam more spiritually satisfying than Hinduism and hence becomes Kamala Surayya. [Whether Islam made her any happier is a question worth probing. But this post is not about her.] A Javed Akhtar may be disillusioned with the same Islam and become an atheist. Religion should be a personal choice. Why should anyone, including the government (especially the government), interfere with people’s relationships with their gods?

Ideally, Caesar and God should remain separate, as Jesus implied. They have nothing to do with each other except that both survive on taxes extracted from people. In practice, however, governments are forced to put some reins on religions because the latter are seldom about spirituality. If we check the material assets of certain religious institutions, we will be shocked to discover that some of them can give Mukesh Ambani or Gautam Adani a run for their money. Mata Amritanandamayi’s assets, for example, are estimated to be 19 billion rupees. Baba Ramdev and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar have 15 billion rupees each. There are Christian congregations with similar material assets in India. Where there is money, there will be government’s presence too. Gods are not beyond taxes. Jesus was not totally right.

Government interference is not about taxes alone, however. Where there is so much wealth at play, there will be all sorts of manipulations. This is where conversions become controversies. Most religious conversions are not about spirituality at all. Look at the kind of people who get converted. They are the people living on the margins of societies. The poor and the downtrodden. The social outcasts. People unwanted even by government’s welfare schemes. Governments are not even aware of their existence, in fact. Such people are easy prey for religious gurus. God is their daily bread. Give them a bag of rice and they sell their gods. Who do you blame now? The government could give them more than that bag of rice, couldn’t it?  And save their gods! But the government will do no such thing. For the government, the poor are just fodder for electoral politics. The government knows that missionaries of all sorts will cast their nets for trapping the poor. And the poor like to be caught in those nets too because they get their rice bags or whatever. And then the government can make that an issue for getting more votes from one particular religious community. This is what religious conversion is all about in India. Quite a silly but cruel game.

PS. Written for Indispire Edition 433: Who's afraid of religious conversion? #ReligiousConversion

 

Comments

  1. It's really difficult for people to convert to the religion of truth. Hence, the problem of conversion.
    Spirituality is absolutely personal. One should be daring to face both the God and the demon inside or within oneself. True yet very challenging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religions should start doing their job seriously. There's a joke about a man who stood on his balcony blessing all passers-by. On being questioned he said, 'Since the bishop is in my bedroom doing what I should be doing, here I am doing what he should be doing.' Today religion is doing anything other than what it should be.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Well said, sir! Making one's own way to a particular faith structure or philosophy is one thing, being actively 'hunted' and 'flipped' is quite another. Every religion, at its highest knowledge base, does teach essentially the same thing. The problems arise when those who hold the knowledge also seek to convert that into power and filter it down throught doctrine - the dos and dont's of practice, the punishiments and shames lain upon one for failing to follow the instruction; and in this each religion may differ - yet are also the same. And most certainly, as political as religion can become, it ought to keep itself out of Politics! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If religions actually do what they should be doing, the world be a Paradise.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...