Skip to main content

Who’s afraid of conversions?

No conversion, only posing


The New Year witnessed some attacks on Christian churches in Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district. Religious conversion is said to be the reason. I came to know from a personal source that the problem started as a family feud and burgeoned into communal violence. Many such attacks on religious places happened in the past in India and many more will take place in future too. Because religion in this country is not about spirituality but about power and manipulations.

The most fundamental question that arises is whether we need religion at all. The answer is quite obvious. Very obvious to those who think clearly. If it is the spiritual meaning of life that you are seeking, religion may help but it is not the best means. Your personal enquiries and spiritual exercises will help you much better. Spirituality is a personal affair in the first place. Unless it touches your heart, it is not spirituality at all. Religion and its institutions may help you in the process of discovering and refining your heart. But the effort is all yours, absolutely personal. The hard truth is you don’t any institution for that. You need the will to do it. You need the courage to face your heart. The courage to face the god that resides in your heart.  And the demons as well – more than the god, in fact.

Secondly, is one religion better than another for your spiritual journey? I believe religion should be a purely personal choice. Though people often say that every religion teaches more or less the same things (to cultivate virtues and shun evil), I think religions have fundamental differences. The Semitic religions, for example, are quite different from most oriental religions like Hinduism in their theology, rituals and outlooks. It is possible that one Kamala Das finds Islam more spiritually satisfying than Hinduism and hence becomes Kamala Surayya. [Whether Islam made her any happier is a question worth probing. But this post is not about her.] A Javed Akhtar may be disillusioned with the same Islam and become an atheist. Religion should be a personal choice. Why should anyone, including the government (especially the government), interfere with people’s relationships with their gods?

Ideally, Caesar and God should remain separate, as Jesus implied. They have nothing to do with each other except that both survive on taxes extracted from people. In practice, however, governments are forced to put some reins on religions because the latter are seldom about spirituality. If we check the material assets of certain religious institutions, we will be shocked to discover that some of them can give Mukesh Ambani or Gautam Adani a run for their money. Mata Amritanandamayi’s assets, for example, are estimated to be 19 billion rupees. Baba Ramdev and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar have 15 billion rupees each. There are Christian congregations with similar material assets in India. Where there is money, there will be government’s presence too. Gods are not beyond taxes. Jesus was not totally right.

Government interference is not about taxes alone, however. Where there is so much wealth at play, there will be all sorts of manipulations. This is where conversions become controversies. Most religious conversions are not about spirituality at all. Look at the kind of people who get converted. They are the people living on the margins of societies. The poor and the downtrodden. The social outcasts. People unwanted even by government’s welfare schemes. Governments are not even aware of their existence, in fact. Such people are easy prey for religious gurus. God is their daily bread. Give them a bag of rice and they sell their gods. Who do you blame now? The government could give them more than that bag of rice, couldn’t it?  And save their gods! But the government will do no such thing. For the government, the poor are just fodder for electoral politics. The government knows that missionaries of all sorts will cast their nets for trapping the poor. And the poor like to be caught in those nets too because they get their rice bags or whatever. And then the government can make that an issue for getting more votes from one particular religious community. This is what religious conversion is all about in India. Quite a silly but cruel game.

PS. Written for Indispire Edition 433: Who's afraid of religious conversion? #ReligiousConversion

 

Comments

  1. DawnanddewJanuary 8, 2023 at 11:27 PM

    It's really difficult for people to convert to the religion of truth. Hence, the problem of conversion.
    Spirituality is absolutely personal. One should be daring to face both the God and the demon inside or within oneself. True yet very challenging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 9, 2023 at 5:14 AM

      Religions should start doing their job seriously. There's a joke about a man who stood on his balcony blessing all passers-by. On being questioned he said, 'Since the bishop is in my bedroom doing what I should be doing, here I am doing what he should be doing.' Today religion is doing anything other than what it should be.

      Delete
    2. DawnanddewJanuary 9, 2023 at 5:19 PM

      Well said!

      Delete
  2. Yamini MacLeanJanuary 8, 2023 at 11:50 PM

    Hari OM
    Well said, sir! Making one's own way to a particular faith structure or philosophy is one thing, being actively 'hunted' and 'flipped' is quite another. Every religion, at its highest knowledge base, does teach essentially the same thing. The problems arise when those who hold the knowledge also seek to convert that into power and filter it down throught doctrine - the dos and dont's of practice, the punishiments and shames lain upon one for failing to follow the instruction; and in this each religion may differ - yet are also the same. And most certainly, as political as religion can become, it ought to keep itself out of Politics! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJanuary 9, 2023 at 5:16 AM

      If religions actually do what they should be doing, the world be a Paradise.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
44 comments
Read more

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The
62 comments
Read more

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so
39 comments
Read more

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let
36 comments
Read more

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r
34 comments
Read more