Skip to main content

The Witch in the Peepul Tree



Book Review

Title: The Witch in the Peepul Tree

Author: Arefa Tehsin

Publisher: HarperCollins India, 2023

Pages: 327

There is no witch in this novel and the peepul tree hardly plays any role. Both the witch and the peepul are metaphors. In the words of one of the characters, “There is an evil influence in this house, something which is not human.” The house belongs to Dada Bhai who is an exceptionally benevolent human being. His beautiful wife Mena is as good too and she has devoted her life to such noble social causes as empowerment of women and education of girls. Yet there is something sinister about their house. There may be a witch lurking in the heart of the best of people.

This novel is set on the Makar Sankranti day of 1950 in the historical city of Udaipur. The entire plot unfolds in that one single day. In the afternoon of that day, Dada Bhai’s young son discovers the dead body of his 16-year-old sister Sanaz in her room. Did the living witch in the peepul tree take the young girl?

Before the police arrive, we are taken back in time to the morning of the Makar Sankranti day. We get to meet all the important characters in that morning. Meet Rao Sahib, the Zamindar, who shares the bloodline with none less than the Maharana of Mewar. His libido is good enough for dozens of wives though he has only four of them. There are a few concubines to compensate for the shortage. We are given clear insights into the unjust zamindari system of the time.

Dada Bhai’s mother, Sugra, has her own schemes and strategies to keep her control over the members of the family. She believes that the witch in the peepul tree is her ally.

There are people from the low castes too who open up for us the pathetic conditions of such people in the nascent days of independent India. There is Parijat, a young nightsoil worker, whose half-formed breasts are fondled by the elder Rao Sahib who is on his deathbed. Untouchability is only in public life. In reality, the entire caste system was created for facilitating the easy exploitation of some people by a few others. “We were born in drains,” as Parijat’s husband tells her, “we will die in drains. There are no seven upper worlds for us. Only the seven under worlds – the seven hells.” Those who try to disrupt that well-established system will only bring troubles – as Parijat’s brother, Valmiki, is doing by abandoning his caste and joining the Congress Party.

We also meet Nathu, a tribesman. The free India didn’t make the life of his people any better. Nathu knows that “His jungle tribe would always be lesser people. Secondary. Tertiary. Or whatever came after that. They had been exploited, abused and preyed upon for centuries. They would be, for time to come. Theirs was the story history would repeat but never change; always leave it without a happy ending. Over centuries, their hearts had turned porous, not able to hold the flood of suffering. These people of the forest had learnt to handle death and loss as the city people had termed: practically.”

The plot moves seamlessly between history and fiction. The characters are all well-developed and enchanting in their own unique ways, rooted firmly in their own peculiar soils. Apart from the ones already mentioned above is Hariharan who is quite like Shakuni Mama of the Mahabharat. But towards the end of the novel, we get to know why Hariharan became what he is; and we sympathise with him in spite of his shadiness.

The first half of the novel moves at a slow pace making us meet all these charming characters. Charming doesn’t mean good. It is only in the second half that we return to the murder and its mysteries. The witch turns out to be a real person. There is a witch present in all of us, probably. The novel succeeds brilliantly in holding up a mirror to ourselves too while it takes us through a rather complex labyrinth of the struggling good and the marauding evil and the helpless mediocre.

A lot of Hindi and Urdu words appear on almost every page making it a little difficult to read for those who are not familiar with those languages and their cultures. Look at this sentence, for example: “She shifted on her janamaz, spread on the sitting area by the jharokha, and resumed rolling her tasbi.”

In spite of all that, the novel is a delight to read. Read it slowly and enjoy its unique music. There’s music in the narrative too. For instance: “They could take her life, but not her name. Not the fireflies that pulled the strings of constellations at night as she lay watching them emerge from the holed roof of her hut.”

This novel takes us back to the India of 1950s. At least some parts of India. It is a journey worth undertaking. It is as provocative as it is haunting. The witch is real!

PS. This review is powered by Blogchatter Book Review Program

Comments

  1. She haunts India today too! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. there is a very interesting blog our nature I like that's

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree the first half read like a slow burn, the story taking its own sweet time to cook, and the real thrill comes in the 2nd half. I enjoyed the book too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In spite of the slowness, the book catches hold of us.

      Delete
  4. Thank you for the lovely review!

    ReplyDelete
  5. *Spoiler ahead*

    What do you think about the ending? I'm sorta confused though I liked the book. Did Mena Bai accidentally kill her? Does Sugra with her deal with hijra has a hand in this plot? What about Hariharan? Did he just say that or is he involved in Sanaz's death?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...