Skip to main content

Ashoka is still relevant



Book

Title: Ashoka: Portrait of a Philosopher King

Author: Patrick Olivelle

Publisher: HarperCollins India, 2023

Pages: xxxix + 356

This book belongs to a series that is being brought out by HarperCollins: Indian Lives. Ashoka belonged to a period about which we know relatively little: 3rd century BCE. The centuries that followed Ashoka chose to ignore the great emperor because of politico-religious reasons. The Brahmins were averse to Ashoka and his teachings. Hence they chose to project the epic kings, Yudhishthira and Rama, as ideals, and relegate Ashoka to the dark backgrounds of history. Both Ramayana and Mahabharata had kings who were always devoted to the welfare and supremacy of Brahmins while Ashoka strove to forge an egalitarian society.

Patrick Olivelle, the author, was born and raised in Sri Lanka. He is one of the greatest living scholars of ancient India, according to Ramachandra Guha, editor of the series of which this book is the first. Olivelle relies more on Ashoka’s own writings, the edicts and other inscriptions, than on secondary sources and legends. Ashoka’s personality is re-created by Olivelle from the emperor’s own writings. The book is scholarly but devoid of jargon.

Ashoka must have received a cosmopolitan, multicultural upbringing, argues the book. Many Greeks who had accompanied Alexander the Great chose to stay back and some of those women ended up in the Indian palaces. Ashoka’s father and grandfather probably married Greek princesses. At any rate, Ashoka was very open to new realities and possibilities including religions and gods.

The author of this book says that Ashoka must be the only king in human history who was “strong” enough to say “I am sorry.” Ashoka regretted the horrors of Kalinga War which killed about 100,000 people, deported 150,000 and caused the death of another 100,000 indirectly. But the emperor’s conversion to nonviolent Buddhism was not an overnight miracle. Ashoka wanted deeper solutions to political problems and hence he visited the Buddhist monasteries and studied the religion earnestly. Buddhism was already well-established in those days. There were plenty of monasteries.

As Ashoka studied Buddhism more and more, his spiritual focus shifted from nirvana to dharma. The last two decades of his life saw Ashoka focussing on dharma more than anything else. “If there was a single attribute that defined Ashoka’s primary identity, it was his devotion to dharma,” Olivelle writes. He saw the propagation of dharma across the world as his lasting legacy. When he sent monks and nuns to teach the world, it was his notion of dharma more than Buddhism that he wanted the world to understand.

Dharma, for Ashoka, was moral behaviour based on reason. It is the same for all humans. It is not one dharma for the Brahmins and another for the ruling class and yet another for others. What Ashoka envisaged was a world where goodness reigned. “The aim of Ashoka’s dharma project was to create a moral population with cultivated virtues that informed their relationships to significant others within their social universe, a moral cultivation that leads to happiness both here and in the hereafter.”

Ashoka was indeed a philosopher-king that Plato would have approved of. But India’s Brahmins and their religion could not accept Ashoka’s great vision which was also ecumenical. Ashoka respected all religions. He was not interested in converting anyone to any other religion. He never dreamt of something like One Empire, One Religion, One Language… Ashoka was a secularist in the true sense of the term. No wonder Jawaharlal Nehru admired him.

Nehru not only admired Ashoka but also emulated him in many ways. The book quotes French historian Amaury de Riencourt: “In Jawaharlal Nehru India found a remarkable reincarnation of emperor Ashoka.” Unfortunately, Nehru has also been villainised today in India which has transmogrified Ashoka’s gentle lions into angry killers. Even the meek Hanuman was forced to put on passions he could never have, what to say about lions!

The book does not enter into contemporary politics. These last few lines are my own additions to the review. The book made me think in those lines. It will make you think a lot too. It is worth spending time with this book, I assure you.

Ashoka's Lions


  

Modi's Lions

Comments

  1. Ashoka is always my inspiration and I also admire his understanding and wisdom. I think what you are conveying is worthy to be attended. We have a rich legacy of worthy politics that has made our nation great...are we learning from them all? Is the real question. A post to ponder in depth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book is important especially in these times...

      Delete
  2. It's interesting how ever era of history sees itself in the past. Some eras get overlooked while others get idealized. And then change the times, and the eras we look to change as well. Fascinating stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why one of our Malayalam writers, K R Meera, says that the past is not history but imagination.

      Delete
  3. Hari Om
    Added to my TBR pile! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds interesting. Shall look it up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...