Skip to main content

Ashoka is still relevant



Book

Title: Ashoka: Portrait of a Philosopher King

Author: Patrick Olivelle

Publisher: HarperCollins India, 2023

Pages: xxxix + 356

This book belongs to a series that is being brought out by HarperCollins: Indian Lives. Ashoka belonged to a period about which we know relatively little: 3rd century BCE. The centuries that followed Ashoka chose to ignore the great emperor because of politico-religious reasons. The Brahmins were averse to Ashoka and his teachings. Hence they chose to project the epic kings, Yudhishthira and Rama, as ideals, and relegate Ashoka to the dark backgrounds of history. Both Ramayana and Mahabharata had kings who were always devoted to the welfare and supremacy of Brahmins while Ashoka strove to forge an egalitarian society.

Patrick Olivelle, the author, was born and raised in Sri Lanka. He is one of the greatest living scholars of ancient India, according to Ramachandra Guha, editor of the series of which this book is the first. Olivelle relies more on Ashoka’s own writings, the edicts and other inscriptions, than on secondary sources and legends. Ashoka’s personality is re-created by Olivelle from the emperor’s own writings. The book is scholarly but devoid of jargon.

Ashoka must have received a cosmopolitan, multicultural upbringing, argues the book. Many Greeks who had accompanied Alexander the Great chose to stay back and some of those women ended up in the Indian palaces. Ashoka’s father and grandfather probably married Greek princesses. At any rate, Ashoka was very open to new realities and possibilities including religions and gods.

The author of this book says that Ashoka must be the only king in human history who was “strong” enough to say “I am sorry.” Ashoka regretted the horrors of Kalinga War which killed about 100,000 people, deported 150,000 and caused the death of another 100,000 indirectly. But the emperor’s conversion to nonviolent Buddhism was not an overnight miracle. Ashoka wanted deeper solutions to political problems and hence he visited the Buddhist monasteries and studied the religion earnestly. Buddhism was already well-established in those days. There were plenty of monasteries.

As Ashoka studied Buddhism more and more, his spiritual focus shifted from nirvana to dharma. The last two decades of his life saw Ashoka focussing on dharma more than anything else. “If there was a single attribute that defined Ashoka’s primary identity, it was his devotion to dharma,” Olivelle writes. He saw the propagation of dharma across the world as his lasting legacy. When he sent monks and nuns to teach the world, it was his notion of dharma more than Buddhism that he wanted the world to understand.

Dharma, for Ashoka, was moral behaviour based on reason. It is the same for all humans. It is not one dharma for the Brahmins and another for the ruling class and yet another for others. What Ashoka envisaged was a world where goodness reigned. “The aim of Ashoka’s dharma project was to create a moral population with cultivated virtues that informed their relationships to significant others within their social universe, a moral cultivation that leads to happiness both here and in the hereafter.”

Ashoka was indeed a philosopher-king that Plato would have approved of. But India’s Brahmins and their religion could not accept Ashoka’s great vision which was also ecumenical. Ashoka respected all religions. He was not interested in converting anyone to any other religion. He never dreamt of something like One Empire, One Religion, One Language… Ashoka was a secularist in the true sense of the term. No wonder Jawaharlal Nehru admired him.

Nehru not only admired Ashoka but also emulated him in many ways. The book quotes French historian Amaury de Riencourt: “In Jawaharlal Nehru India found a remarkable reincarnation of emperor Ashoka.” Unfortunately, Nehru has also been villainised today in India which has transmogrified Ashoka’s gentle lions into angry killers. Even the meek Hanuman was forced to put on passions he could never have, what to say about lions!

The book does not enter into contemporary politics. These last few lines are my own additions to the review. The book made me think in those lines. It will make you think a lot too. It is worth spending time with this book, I assure you.

Ashoka's Lions


  

Modi's Lions

Labels

Labels:

Comments

  1. WaterJune 11, 2024 at 9:39 PM

    Ashoka is always my inspiration and I also admire his understanding and wisdom. I think what you are conveying is worthy to be attended. We have a rich legacy of worthy politics that has made our nation great...are we learning from them all? Is the real question. A post to ponder in depth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 12, 2024 at 7:19 AM

      The book is important especially in these times...

      Delete
  2. Liz A.June 12, 2024 at 12:54 AM

    It's interesting how ever era of history sees itself in the past. Some eras get overlooked while others get idealized. And then change the times, and the eras we look to change as well. Fascinating stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 12, 2024 at 7:21 AM

      That's why one of our Malayalam writers, K R Meera, says that the past is not history but imagination.

      Delete
  3. Yamini MacLeanJune 12, 2024 at 1:34 AM

    Hari Om
    Added to my TBR pile! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. magiceyeJune 12, 2024 at 6:59 AM

    Sounds interesting. Shall look it up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...
39 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...
30 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...
28 comments
Read more