Skip to main content

Good Life



I introduced A C Grayling’s book, The God Argument, in two earlier posts.  This post presents the professor’s views on good life. 

Grayling posits seven characteristics of a good life. 

The first characteristic is that a good life is a meaningful one.  Meaning is “a set of values and their associated goals that give a life its shape and direction.”  Having children to look after or achieving success in one’s profession or any other very ordinary goal can make life meaningful.  But Grayling says quoting Oscar Wilde that everyone’s map of the world should have a Utopia on it.  That is, everyone should dream of a better world and strive to materialise that dream, if life is to be truly meaningful. 

Ability to form relationships with other people is the second characteristic.  Intimacy with at least one other person is an important feature of a meaningful life.  “Good relationships make better people,” says Grayling.  Broken relationships are one’s own making, though others might have contributed to the failure.

Activity is the third characteristic.  It is about doing, making or learning something.  Life would be a big bore without its inevitable demands and obligations.  Activity is about meeting those demands and obligations.  “We are animals who thrive when engaged, and suffer from idleness,” says Grayling.  The normal human occupations can take the place of activity.  But Grayling recommends another important occupation: express one’s ideas and invite others to test them and criticise them.  This is similar to what science does.  Science invites others to test and challenge its inventions and discoveries.  Our ideas mature when we do this.  We become fuller human beings in the process.

A good life is consistently marked by honesty or authenticity.  This is the fourth characteristic.  This is about a “directness, emotional honesty, a refusal to escape into pieties, nonsense or comforting illusions, but above all an ability to ‘see things steadily and see them whole’...”  We live in a world of compromises and pretences and bald untruths which enslave us.  Authenticity gives us freedom.  Autonomy is a better word.  Autonomy means “being one’s own lawmaker at the core of one’s moral being.”  It is the inner freedom one achieves in spite of the constraints imposed on one by one’s upbringing, society, and other external factors or forces. 

The last three characteristics are highly inter-related and Grayling discusses them together.  They are:
Fifth: Manifestation of one’s autonomy: This means that the individual accepts responsibility for the choices that shape the course of his/her life.  Contrast this with what the fundamentalist does.  The fundamentalist puts the blame for all evils on others and goes on to impose his narrow truths on others.  The fundamentalist is one of the least autonomous individuals.

Sixth: A felt quality of life: A person who lives a good life (in Grayling’s sense) feels the richness of his/her life.  Obviously this richness is absolutely different from the riches that most people run after.

Seventh: Integrity:  This is a feeling of inner wholeness or completeness.  The individual good consists in harmony between the different elements of the soul, said Plato.  That harmony is what is meant by integrity. 

Grayling presents this system in the beginning of the second part of his book.  The first part is a criticism of religion and theism.  The second part proposes humanism as a viable alternative to religion.  Humanism is based on the simple assertion that human beings are rational enough to understand themselves and their positions in the world and hence make responsible and meaningful choices which in turn will make life much more beautiful and meaningful than any religion or belief in god(s) can. 

When religions have done so much harm in the world, it is a good idea to think of an alternative.



The two earlier posts inspired by Grayling:

Comments

  1. well its human to rely upon rules , be dependent, be guided , follow as herd .. and hence religion has no alternate big enough as of now ! But sometime soon the pot of religious ill would crack breaking the concept of religion once and for all and for good, i feel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Grayling says that one reason why religion is popular is sheer laziness of people. People are too lazy to think for themselves and accept the answers given by an authority like religion. What better authority is there than God?

      Delete
  2. The concept from where I see is quite well solved from the blogging I induglge in. The ranging from having a goal (become a writer) til opening myself up for criticism. From where I see writing is my way of living life and a blog or perhaps a novel in distant future my tool. In words of grayling if science is to religion then for me religion is to writing. And if technology is to ritual then for me that ritual is to blog, get published and also read others. :) my own creation of understanding :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If writing is your goal, much of the problem is already solved, Richa. You are a fortunate person. And best wishes.

      Delete
  3. Interesting read Tomichan Sir!
    I feel good relationship is very important characteristic of good life. Many other things fall in place once this is proper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fact, Indrani, all these 7 characteristics are inter-related. Good relationships come naturally to people who possess the other characteristics.

      Delete
  4. Yes very nice read, these characteristics are very important.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The infirmities that are inherent in individuals and the very inequality that exists with them from the beginning is not laziness. I find the whole message a sort of utopian idealism, though there is a slight hope that anything can be straightened if u take U turn.But it goes against the basic premise that until you have the correct proposition you won't be arriving at the truth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Benny, it appears you took much pain to post the comment. Thanks for the perseverance. Or should I say congrats? :)

      Since you find Grayling's vision utopian idealism, let me quote the author himself: "It is said ... that all good things began as dreams or ideals."

      But I'm curious about the view you expressed on "basic premise". Are you questioning the basic premise of the professor that all human beings are rational?

      Delete
    2. I doubt even the notion that all humans are rational.Even if there is a universal rationale with the humans, its variations are so extreme that some fall far beyond the humans.

      Delete
    3. It looks like you will soon be following Descartes! :)

      Delete
  8. I feel that all the seven characteristics have a significant role to play for one to feel life and feel the completeness and richness (richness in the sense of feeling not materialistic) ! thank you Sir for briefing those points and sharing it as a post ! the points are so well described ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every writer tries to share in what s/he thinks is the best way. I'm intrigued by the number 7 used by many of them. Maslow, brilliant psychologist, presented 7 hierarchies of fulfilment. Deepak Chopra has written an endless number of books with that number. And here is another 7...

      Thank you for telling me that my posts mean something to you.

      Delete
  9. "express one’s ideas and invite others to test them and criticise them." - Well, that is meaningful enough for me :)

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindsight tells me why it is meaningful to you, Raghuram. I remember your last email to me.

      Delete
  10. This definitely is interesting read with many meaningful characterization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Characteristics, Rajesh, yes, the book can mean a lot provided we are ready to get rid of some of our past...

      Delete
  11. Maybe I don't have maturity to understand these things but for me, the fourth point - the authenticity or emotional honesty - is the most important thing. I personally believe that unless you have an emotional honesty, you don't even have the capacity to set meaningful goal for your life. But then, to each its own. Good point of view though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, Pankti, these characteristics are not watertight compartments. They are all interrelated. A former student of mine, a brilliant one, commented on FB that only the first characteristic really matters, the rest are appendices... These are mere guidelines to make our life richer, not rules.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl