Skip to main content

Responsible Blogging


People have different reasons for writing.  From an expression of one’s thoughts and feelings to looking for appreciation, writing can be motivated by anything.  In most cases, the motives are mixed.  Blogging too has various motives similarly.

Whatever we do as a social activity must be done with a considerable sense of responsibility since it affects the society one way or another.  Quite a lot of bloggers engage in harmless activities such as putting up simple poems or photos.  Many focus on travel, food, shopping or some such innocuous theme.  However, when it comes to dealing with political, religious, social and other such issues some caution is required.

In 1992, American political scientist Francis Fukuyama predicted that human civilisation would evolve towards a conflict-free utopia founded on liberal democracy and free market capitalism.  Samuel P. Huntington, another political scientist, countered it immediately arguing that the clash of civilisations would continue since each of the major civilisations including the Indian one has its dreams for dominating the world.  Huntington was vindicated by the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and the fundamentalist assertions in India by the Right wing.  Cultural and religious identities will clash with one another creating conflicts, Huntington had argued.

We are living in the world which is fulfilling Huntington’s prophecy.  In spite of the tremendous progress we are making in the field of science and technology, we are becoming more and more narrow-minded because of the cultural and religious clashes and hankering after dominance.  Probably, science and technology is leaving us in an emotional and ‘spiritual’ vacuum.  And we are filling that vacuum with the intoxication of pop religion and pop culture in the form of various cults and movements.  Godmen of all sorts are becoming more and more popular.  Cultural and religious intolerance is on the rise more than ever and political leaders are weaving rhetorical dreams using strife.

There are a lot of bloggers too who are actively engaged in these activities.  They spread disinformation, hatred, and extremely prejudiced views.  It is in such a context that bloggers need to look within and ask about the role of responsibility in blogging.


PS. Written for Indispire Edition 112: #ResponsibleBlogging

Comments

  1. First of all fashion, travel etc are not innocuous themes. Everything has its rightful place in the world. Secondly - bloggers who spread disinformation or write in a biased manner ( for example the men's rights movement, or bloggers who call JNU students anti national) have their own fan following. This following believes in the same mind set that the blogger is writing about and neither the reader nor the writer has bothered to give a balanced view or done enough research. That's the downside of bloggers and also the reason why not all of them are taken seriously.
    Must write a blog post on this instead of making an uber long comment on your post which btw is awesome, as always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By innocuous, I meant 'harmless' (which is the simplest meaning of the word) and I think fashion and travel are quite harmless as far as the influence of such blogging on society is concerned.

      When it comes to gathering a fan following, I get scared. Look at the man who has the most fan following today in the country. Is he doing any great service to the country? That's why I look for responsibility.

      Do bloggers actually do any research? I would like to see some more blogs coming from deep understanding of life and related themes.

      Lookinng forward to your blog on this.

      Delete
  2. Well, who is authority in giving the certificate of ‘Responsible Blogger?’ I remember someone asked me to be a responsible blogger because I was asking to plan one’s death. I also remember that you tried to make the person understand the spiritual side of it but the effort went into vain.

    In my opinion, it was responsible blogging to make people aware of spiritual aspect of death. And in her opinion, she was responsible blogger because she was making awareness against suicide. We both were responsible in our respective context.

    Responsibility is relative concept and clashes begin when one starts ‘Responsibility Policing.’ I think it’s better to behave responsibly instead of teaching responsibility to others. And this is the case of present India, where everybody’s teaching responsibility to others instead of being responsible, whether it’s ruling party or opposition or their supporters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No authority is required, Ravish. Responsibility comes from within. From our own understanding of life. Nothing more. So in different words 'responsible blogging' would mean 'good understanding of life' simply because any good writer becomes good only because of a good understanding of life.

      Responsibility is a relative concept. Subjective, I would say. Life is a personal affair. Morality is. Religion is (should be).

      I agree with you that present India is trying to teach others what one does not practise oneself. When morality police attacks couples or lovers, they are actually unleashing their frustration of not being able to be in love.

      If I may take that example a step forward, the guardians of cows today are people who have failed to guard their own children!

      Delete
  3. I think you have raised an important issue in this post. A big reason why intolerance is growing is the sensationalist reporting by old world media folks and new world bloggers. They look to write on topics that they know will titillate. To that extent, they play up to an unfortunate aspect of human nature. For a moment, conceding that it is the media's job to throw a spotlight on what ails society, let us look at the 'responsibility' when discussing social ills. Truth is there is little attempt to thoroughly research, verify and present a balanced view. In the West, universities train students in the art of critical thinking, which demands that even while positing a hypothesis, all angles must first be examined and debated on before going on to present support to the stated hypothesis. If I may, this is what Matheikal is suggesting here. When we write a blog, do we examine different angles even while substantiating an opinion we may be airing? Let's think about it please. To begin with, all the comments here countering Matheikal could make a start. If nothing, blogs that are personal opinions should clearly state that and not present a post as authoritative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps many bloggers who look at life through colored lenses may have ulterior motives: supporting a political party, for example. But as you say, many are not ready to look at life from well researched perspectives.

      Critical thinking is discouraged in India. As a teacher, I have been shocked by the attitudes of many colleagues in this regard. Students don't want to think, on the other hand. One reason why some exams become tough for students is because the questions demand critical or abstract thinking which the students are not trained for.

      Delete
  4. Great article Tomichan. I steer clear of any blog which has a religious or political theme because I already have a opinion of my own on these matters and don't see the need to hear what they think especially since most of the time they are written with prejudiced views.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Jyothi, for the appreciation.

      I too have a clear opinion on religion and politics. But my view is unifying, integrating. So I write about it. Irresponsibility is divisive.

      Delete
  5. Im sorry, responsible blogging also means not to hurt one's sentiments... and also of course to give an 'unbiased' opinion but it doesnt quite seem so. Although your article is amazing, I believe its also one's perspective that matters. For example, you just said that the man who's the most followed here isnt serving the country and thats your perspective, but I believe the contrary.
    So its very difficult to be a RESPONSIBLE BLOGGER
    The best way to avoid controversies is to either be silent or be diplomatic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no need to be sorry. Dissension is welcome here unlike among the fans of the hero. That's precisely why my perspective may remain superior to that of the fans. There can be no debate without dissension. No growth without debate. Unity is not uniformity. What you see as bias is merely a difference of opinion. The question is whether you can tolerate such differences. Or should we all subscribe to only one view?

      It is not really difficult to be a responsible blogger. It may be painful in the sense you may end up offending people who cannot tolerate differences of opinion.

      Can a writer be genuine and be diplomatic at the same time? Diplomacy may be a virtue in a politician. In a writer it is likely to be a vice insofar as it can lead to mendacity.

      A lot of great works would never have been written if the writers had to be diplomatic. Satanic Verses, for example. Even D H Lawrence's novels met with a lot of opposition from his contemporaries because he refused to be diplomatic.

      Well, I could go on. But let me stop here.

      Thanks for your difference. I respect it. Never feel sorry for being what you are.

      Delete
  6. Yes, thank you :)
    Reading your article, I found myself an inspiration to write my own in this topic. Do give a read anr provide me with your valuable feedback.

    http://mahathianand.blogspot.in/2016/04/right-or-wrong.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
  7. A vey sensible point to raise Matheikal. I think it was about 3 years ago when the issue of paid news was on the raise. I think we all as bloggers have a responsibility to cater to, a responsibility to be open and use our judgement and above all a responsibility to our readers that we do not instigate them or try to influence them for a selfish purpose. I know it is a moral authority and there is no way of instilling it, but that is something which makes it more important and relevant

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps bloggers don't take blogging very seriously. That could be a reason for all sorts of things appearing as blogs. Then there is the quest for popularity. For gift vouchers. In the whole interminable process of superficial quests, we forget to be responsible. ☺

      Delete
  8. Its a very relevant post considering bloggers are being attacked and killed in some countries based on their political views. As bloggers, we need to be responsible to write what he or she feels but also accept the consequences or repercussions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That implies also the responsibility of the readers.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ivan the unusual friend

When you are down and out, you will find that people are of two types. One is the kind that will walk away from you because now you are no good. They will pretend that you don’t exist. They don’t see you even if you happen to land right in front of them. The other is the sort that will have much fun at your expense. They will crack jokes about you even to you or preach at you or pray over you. This latter people are usually pretty happy that you are broke. You make them feel more comfortable with themselves even to the point of self-righteousness. Ivan was an exception. When I slipped on the path of life and started a free fall that would last many years before I hit the bottom without a thud but with enormous anguish, Ivan stood by me for some reason of his own. He didn’t display any affection which probably he didn’t have. He didn’t display any dislike either. There was no question of preaching or praying. No jokes either. Ivan was my colleague for a brief period at St Joseph’s

Joe the tenacious friend

AI-generated illustration You outgrow certain friendships because life changes you in ways that nobody, including you, had expected. Joe is one such friend of mine who was very dear to me once. That friendship cannot be sustained anymore because I am no more the person whom Joe knew and loved to amble along with. And Joe seems incapable of understanding the fact that people can change substantially. Joe and I were supposed to meet one of these days after a gap of more than two decades. I scuttled the meeting rather heartlessly. Just because Joe’s last messages carried words that smacked of intimacy. My life has gone through so much devastating fire that the delicate warmth of intimacy has become repulsive. Joe was a good friend of mine while we were in Shillong. He was a post-graduate student and a part-time schoolteacher when I met him first. I was a fulltime schoolteacher teaching math and science to ninth and tenth graders. My dream was to postgraduate in English literature an

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse