Skip to main content

Little Prince and a lot of megalomania


One of the persons encountered by Antoine de Saint-Exupery’s peripatetic Little Prince is the King of a tiny asteroid.  The King teaches Little Prince that “Accepted authority rests first on reason.  If you ordered your people to go and throw themselves into the sea, they would rise up in revolution.”  The King claims that he has the right to require obedience because his orders are reasonable.

 
Read the book here
From whom will the King demand obedience, however?  Little Prince had noticed that the only inhabitant of the asteroid was the King.  He asks the King, “Over what do you rule?”

  “Over everything,” the King answers promptly and makes a majestic gesture which sweeps everything including the stars and the planets.

  “And the stars obey you?”  Little Prince is dismayed.

  “Certainly they do,” tells the King.  “They do instantly and I do not permit insubordination.”

  Little Prince makes a request.  He being very fond of sunsets would like to see one now.  Can the King order the sun to set since everything obeys him?

  “You shall have your sunset,” says the King.  But Little Prince should wait until conditions are favourable for sunset.  The King explains that authority does not mean making irrational and unnatural demands.  Authority is a harmonious relationship between the ruler and the subject.

  A good ruler should never demand from his subjects anything that would grate against the nature of the latter.  Let the subjects live in their natural freedom as long as one man’s freedom does not meddle with another’s.  Respect everyone’s freedom.  Good authority does not curtail individual freedom.  Nothing need be imposed.  Not gods.  Not morality.  Nothing.

  But that is the ideal situation.  The fact is that there is no ideal situation.  Even the Kings has human limitations or imperfections.  He likes to feel his power by having someone to order about.  Hence he tries to make Little Prince his minister. When the latter is not interested in the position, the King offers other options.  Little Prince could be a Judge.  There is a rat somewhere on the asteroid and Little Prince could exercise his power by condemning the rat to death and then forgive the rat so that Little Prince can again exercise his power and condemn it to death.  Little Prince cannot condemn anybody to death, however. 

  The King turns out to be a megalomaniac.  Like all those who love power.  Bored of the megalomania, Little Prince takes leave of him.  “I make you my ambassador,” says the King imperiously as Little Prince leaves.  The King feels he is exercising his authority by making Little Prince his ambassador.  It makes no difference to Little Prince since he is leaving the kingdom for good.

  The ideal authority is one which exercises its megalomania without hurting the subjects in any way.  But the subjects have to be as innocent as Little Prince.  And that’s impossible.  I’m amused to think: is the quest of certain people to establish their God’s kingdom on the earth – call it Caliphate or whatever – any more possible than making everyone a Little Prince?


Indian Bloggers




  
Labels:

Comments

  1. Pranju chakrapaniJuly 13, 2016 at 10:04 PM

    If the collective power survives against the rationality of the likes of little prince, I guess caliphate would seem to be a possiblity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 13, 2016 at 10:19 PM

      Will it be? I doubt. Human beings are such creatures that they will never be happy even in heaven. They will start creating problems there simply because somebody wants to be the boss.

      Delete
  2. Pranju chakrapaniJuly 13, 2016 at 10:31 PM

    Ain't this a tendency of human beings, ever since realising their freedom, to incessantly pursue someone to worship. Someone to become a boss. Someone to be a supreme leader. And hence I prefer Ararchism in its truest spirit. It challanges the false rationality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 13, 2016 at 10:39 PM

      Anarchism is again an idealistic solution, especially"in its truest spirit."

      Delete
    2. Pranju chakrapaniJuly 13, 2016 at 11:34 PM

      And these very words make me feel like a believer. A cliched irony.

      Delete
    3. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 6:54 AM

      Inevitable, I think.

      Delete
  3. UnknownJuly 14, 2016 at 12:47 AM

    I remember reading this story long back...
    The prince landed on a desert & then he happened to meet a fox & all..
    Can't remember the whole story, but I really liked it at that time!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 6:47 AM

      It's a classic. The whole book is available now for free download.

      Delete
  4. sunaina sharmaJuly 14, 2016 at 4:32 AM

    A question - What makes you say that the Little Prince is innocent? He questions, and then when he is not satisfied, he leaves....He doesn't, based on your post, agree to being 'ruled', thus rendering authority powerless. The present scenario has youngsters being led literally to their deaths.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 6:50 AM

      LP's innocence is not clear from this post, Sunaina. But it's clear in the book. Innocence is not without curiosity. Innocence is the inner quality which prevents you from letting evil enter you. LP has that quality. Quite different from the present generation.

      Delete
  5. bookwormJuly 14, 2016 at 5:00 AM

    Such a classic. It's been too many years since I've read it. Beware of those who love power. In a way, it's sobering to think that it's most of us. Alana ramblinwitham.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 6:51 AM

      Yes, most of us are likely to relish power if it is given to us.

      Delete
  6. none to be knownJuly 14, 2016 at 6:24 AM

    Power makes a man blind. Then what about power with money. No way that he will care for others. Under caliphate movement there are billions of rupees turning in and out of them. After establishing caliphate in earth they surely will expand it to other planets. That's the nature of human kind.The unlimited wants will create all such social issues. Therefore it is important to control ones wishes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 6:52 AM

      Don't worry. The Caliphate is a mere dream. Internal strife will destroy the dream.

      Delete
    2. none to be knownJuly 14, 2016 at 7:55 AM

      All that we can do is not to lose the hope. It is sure that a dragger is hanging upon their head. As the soon it falls people in those countries can have a peaceful life up to some extent

      Delete
  7. Anupam PatraJuly 14, 2016 at 8:42 AM

    Tomichan, I see your relentless pursuit to save our civilization from Godmen's great godly deeds and I wholeheartedly support it.Wholeheartedly. A meaningful post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 14, 2016 at 9:34 AM

      I am a victim of one Goodman's greed for land. I know a few scores of people who were victimized by the same fraudulent godman who is one of the richest of the kind. Endless greed. Tremendous fraud. Yet he gathers followers in millions. This makes me write...

      Delete
  8. Rajeev MoothedathJuly 14, 2016 at 12:22 PM

    Liked reading the tale and your surmise!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ravish ManiJuly 14, 2016 at 1:45 PM

    Classic indeed. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

A Man Called Ove

Book Review   Title: A Man Called Ove Author: Fredrik Backman Translation from Swedish: Henning Koch Publisher: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, London, 2015 Pages: 295   Ove is a grumpy old man. Right in the initial pages of the novel, we are informed that “People said he was bitter. Maybe they were right. He’d never reflected much on it. People also called him ‘anti-social’. Ove assumed this meant he wasn’t overly keen on people. And in this instance he could totally agree with them. More often than not people were out of their minds.” The novel is Ove’s story It is Ove’s grumpiness that makes him a fascinating character for the reader. Grumpiness notwithstanding, Ove has a lot of goodness within. His world is governed by rules, order and routines. He is superhumanly hardworking and honest. He won’t speak about other people even if such silence means the loss of his job and even personal honour. When his colleague Tom steals money and puts the blame squarely...
12 comments
Read more

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...
2 comments
Read more

Writers and Morality

  Dostoevsky Dostoevsky was a compulsive gambler. He also consumed alcohol rather liberally. But he remains one of my favourite novelists of all time. Very few writers have produced novels that surpass the greatness of The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment . This raises a fundamental question: Should we keep a writer’s personal life totally aside while assessing the literary merit of their works? Going a little further with Dostoevsky, his personal vices gave him firsthand experience of despair, guilt, and redemption, which shaped the deep psychological and moral explorations in his novels. Raskolnikov and Ivan Karamazov were all parts of Dostoevksy’s complex personality. In other words, if Dostoevsky was an ideal human being, he wasn’t likely to have produced such great novels. It may also be recalled that most of his greatest works were written under extreme pressure from creditors who kept knocking at his door. If he were not the compulsive gambler that he was, t...
10 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more