Religious fundamentalism has existed for centuries. For any secular person who seeks to be guided
by reason rather than myth and scriptures, the history of religious
fundamentalism will tower like a daunting vampire that has sucked too much
human blood already. Why does so much violence continue to plague the human
civilisation in spite of the tremendous progress we have made in science and
technology which are antithetical to religion?
What prompts our scientists to offer coconuts or milk to granite idols
for the successful take-off of a scientific marvel like a satellite launcher? Why does religion, especially the
fundamentalist version of it, linger on persistently and stubbornly when it has
wreaked more havoc than done anything substantially good for mankind?
Karen Armstrong’s book, The
Battle for God, answers
these questions. Originally
published in 2000, the book is subtitled Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and
Islam and traces the history of religious fundamentalism in the three
Semitic religions. This scholarly
history can throw ample light on fundamentalism in other religions too.
The book is divided into two parts: (1) The Old World and the New; and (2) Fundamentalism. The first part looks at the years from 1492
to 1870. 1492 is a significant year in
religious history because it is the year in which Christopher Columbus set out
to discover India and ended up in America and also the year in which the King
of Spain who sponsored Columbus’s expedition started his religious war on the
Jews (Edict of Expulsion) and the Muslims (conquest of Granada). The brutal head of religious fundamentalism revealed
its fangs in that year, in short. Part 1 of the book looks at the various
fundamentalists and their theories beliefs that swayed the centuries that
followed.
The second part of the book covers the period between 1870 and the end of the
millennium. By 1870 (the year of the Franco-Prussian war which revealed the
hideous effects of modern weaponry), people began to look at science with
suspicion. Sigmund Freud had argued that
human beings are motivated more by the dark forces in the subconscious and
unconscious mind than by the rational thinking in the conscious mind. Charles
Dickens had illustrated the dark side of industrialisation and scientific
progress. The Romantic poets had
described the city as the new hell.
Scientific progress and rational thinking created a vacuum in human minds.
As Sartre said later, “a god-shaped hole” arose in the human
consciousness. Armstrong says that “Human
beings find it almost impossible to live without a sense that, despite the distressing
evidence to the contrary, life has ultimate meaning and value.” Science and rationalism took away that sense
of meaning and value. Hence religion
came back with vengeance.
The second part of the book
is a history of the fundamentalisms that shook the modern world. Once again we
encounter the fundamentalists of all the three religions under investigation.
Armstrong does not point
a finger at anyone. Her strength is her
empathy, her ability to stand in the shoes of the other person. She is of the opinion that most religious
fundamentalists were serving a meaningful function by offering people a new
meaning and a new purpose in their life which had otherwise become spiritually
sterile.
Armstrong argues that
knowledge has two forms: mythos and logos. Mythos appeals to
the dark side of the human mind while logos, rational knowledge, can only
satisfy the conscious mind. The dark
side is more dominant. Myths and
religious rituals help people to deal with their inner demons.
This is the reason why
those fundamentalists who tried to rationalise religion, to explain its
scriptures and rituals rationally, failed to make any impact. Only those fundamentalists succeeded who went
back to the old myths and rituals and made them relevant in their own
times.
She also warns against using myths for political purposes.
All such misuse of myths have boomeranged in history. While fundamentalism is an effort to contain
the demons within, politics lets lose the demons and wreaks havoc.
It is also argued in the book Thinking Fast and Slow that human beings do not find it easy to comprehend absurdity in life, the randomness in events, the no explanation part to certain actions . This fails the logical mind of the beings and it brings in the filler of religious explanation. As camus explained, we need to embrace absurdity.
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, have you planned on reviewing the ministry of utmost happiness? I am excited to read the book
Camus's "intellectual honesty" wouldn't let him accept the solace of myths. But most people are not bothered by intellectual honesty. They want to "make sense" of what is actually senseless, absurd, by inventing myths.
DeleteI'll definitely read Roy's latest work but waiting for the paperback edition.