Skip to main content

The Battle for God



Book

Religious fundamentalism has existed for centuries.  For any secular person who seeks to be guided by reason rather than myth and scriptures, the history of religious fundamentalism will tower like a daunting vampire that has sucked too much human blood already. Why does so much violence continue to plague the human civilisation in spite of the tremendous progress we have made in science and technology which are antithetical to religion?  What prompts our scientists to offer coconuts or milk to granite idols for the successful take-off of a scientific marvel like a satellite launcher?  Why does religion, especially the fundamentalist version of it, linger on persistently and stubbornly when it has wreaked more havoc than done anything substantially good for mankind?

Karen Armstrong’s book, The Battle for God, answers these questions. Originally published in 2000, the book is subtitled Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam and traces the history of religious fundamentalism in the three Semitic religions.  This scholarly history can throw ample light on fundamentalism in other religions too.

The book is divided into two parts: (1) The Old World and the New; and (2) Fundamentalism.  The first part looks at the years from 1492 to 1870.  1492 is a significant year in religious history because it is the year in which Christopher Columbus set out to discover India and ended up in America and also the year in which the King of Spain who sponsored Columbus’s expedition started his religious war on the Jews (Edict of Expulsion) and the Muslims (conquest of Granada).  The brutal head of religious fundamentalism revealed its fangs in that year, in short. Part 1 of the book looks at the various fundamentalists and their theories beliefs that swayed the centuries that followed.

The second part of the book covers the period between 1870 and the end of the millennium. By 1870 (the year of the Franco-Prussian war which revealed the hideous effects of modern weaponry), people began to look at science with suspicion.  Sigmund Freud had argued that human beings are motivated more by the dark forces in the subconscious and unconscious mind than by the rational thinking in the conscious mind. Charles Dickens had illustrated the dark side of industrialisation and scientific progress.  The Romantic poets had described the city as the new hell. 

Scientific progress and rational thinking created a vacuum in human minds.  As Sartre said later, “a god-shaped hole” arose in the human consciousness.  Armstrong says that “Human beings find it almost impossible to live without a sense that, despite the distressing evidence to the contrary, life has ultimate meaning and value.”  Science and rationalism took away that sense of meaning and value.  Hence religion came back with vengeance. 

The second part of the book is a history of the fundamentalisms that shook the modern world. Once again we encounter the fundamentalists of all the three religions under investigation.

Armstrong does not point a finger at anyone.  Her strength is her empathy, her ability to stand in the shoes of the other person.  She is of the opinion that most religious fundamentalists were serving a meaningful function by offering people a new meaning and a new purpose in their life which had otherwise become spiritually sterile. 

Armstrong argues that knowledge has two forms: mythos and logos.  Mythos appeals to the dark side of the human mind while logos, rational knowledge, can only satisfy the conscious mind.  The dark side is more dominant.  Myths and religious rituals help people to deal with their inner demons. 

This is the reason why those fundamentalists who tried to rationalise religion, to explain its scriptures and rituals rationally, failed to make any impact.  Only those fundamentalists succeeded who went back to the old myths and rituals and made them relevant in their own times. 

She also warns against using myths for political purposes.  All such misuse of myths have boomeranged in history.  While fundamentalism is an effort to contain the demons within, politics lets lose the demons and wreaks havoc. 

Comments

  1. It is also argued in the book Thinking Fast and Slow that human beings do not find it easy to comprehend absurdity in life, the randomness in events, the no explanation part to certain actions . This fails the logical mind of the beings and it brings in the filler of religious explanation. As camus explained, we need to embrace absurdity.

    On a side note, have you planned on reviewing the ministry of utmost happiness? I am excited to read the book

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Camus's "intellectual honesty" wouldn't let him accept the solace of myths. But most people are not bothered by intellectual honesty. They want to "make sense" of what is actually senseless, absurd, by inventing myths.

      I'll definitely read Roy's latest work but waiting for the paperback edition.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

My Experiments with Hindi

M y knowledge of Hindi is remarkably deficient despite my living in the northern parts of India for three whole decades. The language never appealed to me. Rather, my Hindi teachers at school, without exception, were the coarsest people I ever met in that period of my life and they created my aversion to Hindi. Someone told me later that those who took up Hindi as their academic major in Kerala were people who failed to secure admission to any other course. That is, if you’re good for nothing else, then go for Hindi. And so they end up as disgruntled people. We students became the victims of that discontent. I don’t know if this theory is correct, however. Though I studied Hindi as my third language (there was no other option) at school for six years, I couldn’t speak one good sentence in that language when I turned my back on school happily and with immense relief after the tenth grade. Of course, I could manage some simple sentences like में लड़का हू। [I am a boy.] A few line...