Skip to main content

The Battle for God



Book

Religious fundamentalism has existed for centuries.  For any secular person who seeks to be guided by reason rather than myth and scriptures, the history of religious fundamentalism will tower like a daunting vampire that has sucked too much human blood already. Why does so much violence continue to plague the human civilisation in spite of the tremendous progress we have made in science and technology which are antithetical to religion?  What prompts our scientists to offer coconuts or milk to granite idols for the successful take-off of a scientific marvel like a satellite launcher?  Why does religion, especially the fundamentalist version of it, linger on persistently and stubbornly when it has wreaked more havoc than done anything substantially good for mankind?

Karen Armstrong’s book, The Battle for God, answers these questions. Originally published in 2000, the book is subtitled Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam and traces the history of religious fundamentalism in the three Semitic religions.  This scholarly history can throw ample light on fundamentalism in other religions too.

The book is divided into two parts: (1) The Old World and the New; and (2) Fundamentalism.  The first part looks at the years from 1492 to 1870.  1492 is a significant year in religious history because it is the year in which Christopher Columbus set out to discover India and ended up in America and also the year in which the King of Spain who sponsored Columbus’s expedition started his religious war on the Jews (Edict of Expulsion) and the Muslims (conquest of Granada).  The brutal head of religious fundamentalism revealed its fangs in that year, in short. Part 1 of the book looks at the various fundamentalists and their theories beliefs that swayed the centuries that followed.

The second part of the book covers the period between 1870 and the end of the millennium. By 1870 (the year of the Franco-Prussian war which revealed the hideous effects of modern weaponry), people began to look at science with suspicion.  Sigmund Freud had argued that human beings are motivated more by the dark forces in the subconscious and unconscious mind than by the rational thinking in the conscious mind. Charles Dickens had illustrated the dark side of industrialisation and scientific progress.  The Romantic poets had described the city as the new hell. 

Scientific progress and rational thinking created a vacuum in human minds.  As Sartre said later, “a god-shaped hole” arose in the human consciousness.  Armstrong says that “Human beings find it almost impossible to live without a sense that, despite the distressing evidence to the contrary, life has ultimate meaning and value.”  Science and rationalism took away that sense of meaning and value.  Hence religion came back with vengeance. 

The second part of the book is a history of the fundamentalisms that shook the modern world. Once again we encounter the fundamentalists of all the three religions under investigation.

Armstrong does not point a finger at anyone.  Her strength is her empathy, her ability to stand in the shoes of the other person.  She is of the opinion that most religious fundamentalists were serving a meaningful function by offering people a new meaning and a new purpose in their life which had otherwise become spiritually sterile. 

Armstrong argues that knowledge has two forms: mythos and logos.  Mythos appeals to the dark side of the human mind while logos, rational knowledge, can only satisfy the conscious mind.  The dark side is more dominant.  Myths and religious rituals help people to deal with their inner demons. 

This is the reason why those fundamentalists who tried to rationalise religion, to explain its scriptures and rituals rationally, failed to make any impact.  Only those fundamentalists succeeded who went back to the old myths and rituals and made them relevant in their own times. 

She also warns against using myths for political purposes.  All such misuse of myths have boomeranged in history.  While fundamentalism is an effort to contain the demons within, politics lets lose the demons and wreaks havoc. 

Comments

  1. It is also argued in the book Thinking Fast and Slow that human beings do not find it easy to comprehend absurdity in life, the randomness in events, the no explanation part to certain actions . This fails the logical mind of the beings and it brings in the filler of religious explanation. As camus explained, we need to embrace absurdity.

    On a side note, have you planned on reviewing the ministry of utmost happiness? I am excited to read the book

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Camus's "intellectual honesty" wouldn't let him accept the solace of myths. But most people are not bothered by intellectual honesty. They want to "make sense" of what is actually senseless, absurd, by inventing myths.

      I'll definitely read Roy's latest work but waiting for the paperback edition.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...