The first time I read
Richard Bach was in 1980. I read Jonathan
Livingstone Seagull and it obviously led me on to Illusions. As a 20 year-old man who was terribly immature and even
silly, I found the two books a great inspiration. Both the idealistic Jonathan and the reluctant
messiah of Illusions grew in my
consciousness for many years. Then I
grew out of them. The other day I was
looking for a light read as I was recuperating from a viral fever which left me
rather debilitated. Illusions caught my attention.
It kept me riveted though I now don’t agree with quite many of the
things in it which were gospel truths for me some three decades ago.
The basic assumption of Illusions remains true even today. It will remain true any day. The world as seen by most people is an
illusion. We keep chasing shadows such
as money and positions, luxury and redundancy.
We seek to fill the ineluctable vacuum with religion and god(s). It’s only a few rare beings, highly evolved
beings like the protagonist of Illusions,
that realise the futility of all human endeavours.
Human endeavours keep the
world moving forward. Achievements and
more achievements. But the world keeps
becoming a worse place for living in. We
are still living in illusions. All the
progress, all the religions and gods, all the gurus and preachers haven’t added
a modicum of refinement to the human soul.
The really refined being will continue to be shot dead like in Illusions. Perverts rule the world. Religions and gods are the palliatives that
soothe the bruises so that we can go on with our perversions. Illusions are the only truths.
What made you grow out of that illusion? Practicality of mundaneness? I suffer from solipsim, I still believe in the illusion that I am living in.
ReplyDeleteThe stupidity of the practical world steals our illusions. And then gives us perversions in their place.
DeleteIt was a best seller in 1980s.
ReplyDeleteThere seems to be not much difference between the concept of 'illusion' of Bach and the Indian concept of Maya, which was enunciated in the philosophy of Adi Shankaracharya.
ReplyDeleteYes, there's much similarity between the two notions.
Delete