Skip to main content

Aami – Movie Review



To be a poet is to suffer deeply.  The better a poet you are, the greater your inner agonies.  Aami surveys the inner turmoil that bilingual poet Kamala Das (Madhavikutty in Malayalam) went through for most part of her life.  Married at the age of 15 to man 20 years her senior, Kamala (Aami as she is called at home) did not receive the kind of affection she longed for from her husband.  As narrated in Kamala’s autobiography, My Story, her husband ‘raped’ her in the night of their marriage.  Kamala would have loved to get some affectionate fondling from him, at least to have him caress her face after that love-making, a touch on her belly, some expression of affection, instead of being treated like an object of sexual pleasure.


The longing for affection can create acute inner pains, especially when it is denied to a poet with intense passions.  Kamala said in her autobiography that she found an alternative in a man who made love to her passionately.  In the movie that man becomes Lord Krishna.  Kamala’s passionate love-making with a man who “was famous for lust, whose sexual gratification made me happier than the insane sexual urges he aroused in me” becomes her fantasies with Lord Krishna in the movie. Kamala Das had, in the autumn of her life, interpreted her own candid writing as her fantasies. 

Krishna appears as her solace throughout the movie.  Her husband appears as a man who is prosaically pragmatic. He also had a gay friend.  His homosexuality created a further gap between him and Kamala.  Though he overcomes that tendency eventually, Kamala is unable to love him passionately.  Even when she writes her candid autobiography, her husband is only happy to earn some money by selling the candidness.  But human relationships are never simple.  The director, Kamal, manages to portray the complexities that worked out between the passionate poet and her prosaic husband.

The movie also traces the attitude of the Hindu society toward widows when Kamala’s husband dies having acknowledged his wife’s love for him.  A Muslim admirer visits Kamala and arouses her passions once again.  He even manages to get her converted to Islam and change her name to Kamala Surayya.  But when her conversion leads to a communal riot-like situation, the man moves out saving himself.  He was no better than a wind that created some ripples in the water.  The attitude of the ordinary people to religion, both Hindus and Muslims, is shown vividly enough in the movie.  Individuals are of little importance in that struggle to prove the superiority of one’s own religion.  Who cares for your likes and dislikes, your personal freedoms?  What matters is the ascendancy of your religion.

Kamala Das died as Kamala Surayya, but as a terribly disillusioned person, disillusioned with religions.  The movie has successfully dramatized the dilemmas of a poet who struggles between her desire to be herself and her inability to do really so.  The only drawback is that quite often the movie gives us the feeling that we are watching a documentary.  Nevertheless I enjoyed watching it.  I loved the Krishna in the movie.  It is none other than Kamala’s personal god, the god that only each one of us can discover in the deepest core of our hearts in our own unique way, the only way of finding gods.



Comments

  1. Missed seeing this, as this was released in a theatre far away from my place. Good to read your review here.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...