Skip to main content

Creating Hells

Father Zossimov, a character of Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers, defines hell as “the suffering of being unable to love.”  Zossimov is a monk who thinks that everyone is everyone’s responsibility.  That responsibility is love.  When my fellow being commits an error, it is my error too.  Such is the responsibility of love.

These days I come across a lot of people who cite religious texts and scriptures to stake their claim to truth.  Most of these people who are ready to lay down their very lives for the sake of their gods and religions are incapable of simple human love.  In fact, a good many of them are driven by hatred.  Consequently they create hells for others.

The Bible or the Quran or the Gita is the ultimate source of truth for them.  People can choose to believe anything.  They have every right to believe that “Adam ate the apple. / Eve ate Adam. / The serpent ate Eve. / This is the dark intestine.” [Ted Hughes, ‘Theology’]  The problem is when they insist on everyone to accept that dark intestine as the ultimate truth. 

One of today's WhatsApp messages: that 'very great' is a punch in my underbelly
I am a member of many WhatsApp groups more by necessity than choice.  Usually I desist from writing anything in such groups.  Once in a while, however, I respond to something especially if my personal comment is invited.  The latest such exercise got me some chastisement from the ‘religious’ people in that group who thought I was an evil influence with my ‘truths’ which are usually not in tune with religious ‘truths’.  Even if I provide historical or rational evidences for my claims, ‘religious’ people won’t accept.  I have never understood why ‘religious’ people choose to be blatantly blind.

Since I know that such people won’t open their eyes, I refuse to enter into debates with them.  There is no possibility of any common ground between them and me.  Instead of arguing with them, I put up my views in my blog.  They may or may not read.  That’s their choice.  Most of them don’t, I know.  They read only the Bible or the Quran or the Gita.  Let them.  Leave me alone, that’s all what I want.

Father Zossimov makes an interesting observation about such religious people. He says that such people are saved only by the death of their god.  “Men reject their prophets and slay them, but they love their martyrs and honour those whom they have slain,” says the monk.  The crucified Jesus is the most ubiquitous image in Christianity.  And Jesus was slain by the religious leaders of his time.

Religions kill the spirit of the prophet, twist his teachings to suit the needs of the founders of the religions, and then set up the prophet as their god.  It is a god who dances to the tunes played by the believers.  Such believers want others also to dance to those tunes.

The world would be a far better place if such religions didn’t exist. 

Comments

  1. Once you get to understand religions, all religions are in same taste. All the atrocious activities are done for god and yet they believe they will go to heaven. How can god be heaven when all these barbaric activities point out to him alone.


    Responsibility is the greatest fear of humankind as from the beginning. Kean ran from his responsibility as a brother by slaughtering his sibling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, most religions are about power rather than spirituality. It is difficult to believe naively like Browning that "God is in his heaven and all is right with the world."

      Delete
  2. Jesus Christ claimed to be God and said that He will die and rise up on the third day and fulfilled that promise. No other person who has ever lived on the planet has done this. We have more evidence for this than the things that students study. The real problem is that because of sin people do not want follow the teachings of Jesus. They love darkness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Resurrection is a matter of faith and science won't be able to prove it. Not as of now, at least.

      Sin is a fact, a religious word for crime.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Shooting an Elephant

George Orwell [1903-1950] We had an anthology of classical essays as part of our undergrad English course. Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell was one of the essays. The horror of political hegemony is the core theme of the essay. Orwell was a subdivisional police officer of the British Empire in Burma (today Myanmar) when he was forced to shoot an elephant. The elephant had gone musth (an Urdu term for the temporary insanity of male elephants when they are in need of a female) and Orwell was asked to control the commotion created by the giant creature. By the time Orwell reached with his gun, the elephant had become normal. Yet Orwell shot it. The first bullet stunned the animal, the second made him waver, and Orwell had to empty the entire magazine into the elephant’s body in order to put an end to its mammoth suffering. “He was dying,” writes Orwell, “very slowly and in great agony, but in some world remote from me where not even a bullet could damage him further…. It seeme...

Urban Naxal

Fiction “We have to guard against the urban Naxals who are the biggest threat to the nation’s unity today,” the Prime Minister was saying on the TV. He was addressing an audience that stood a hundred metres away for security reasons. It was the birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel which the Prime Minister had sanctified as National Unity Day. “In order to usurp the Sardar from the Congress,” Mathew said. The clarification was meant for Alice, his niece who had landed from London a couple of days back.    Mathew had retired a few months back as a lecturer in sociology from the University of Kerala. He was known for his radical leftist views. He would be what the PM calls an urban Naxal. Alice knew that. Her mother, Mathew’s sister, had told her all about her learned uncle’s “leftist perversions.” “Your uncle thinks that he is a Messiah of the masses,” Alice’s mother had warned her before she left for India on a short holiday. “Don’t let him infiltrate your brai...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Egregious

·       Donald Trump terminated all trade negotiations with Canada “based on their egregious behaviour.” ·       Pakistan has an egregious record of assassinations among its leaders. ·       Benjamin Netanyahu’s egregious disregard for civilian suffering has drawn widespread international condemnation. Now, look at the following sentences. ·       Archias is an egregious and most excellent man. [Cicero’s speech in 62 BCE] ·       “An egregious captain and most valiant soldier.” [Roger Ascham in 1545] U p to about 16 th century, the word egregious had a positive meaning: excellent or outstanding . Cicero was defending Greek poet Aulus Licinius Archias’s request for Roman citizenship. Archias had left his country out of disgust for the corruption of its Seleucid rulers. Ascham was speaking about the qualities of valiant soldiers when he used the ...