Skip to main content

Creating Hells

Father Zossimov, a character of Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers, defines hell as “the suffering of being unable to love.”  Zossimov is a monk who thinks that everyone is everyone’s responsibility.  That responsibility is love.  When my fellow being commits an error, it is my error too.  Such is the responsibility of love.

These days I come across a lot of people who cite religious texts and scriptures to stake their claim to truth.  Most of these people who are ready to lay down their very lives for the sake of their gods and religions are incapable of simple human love.  In fact, a good many of them are driven by hatred.  Consequently they create hells for others.

The Bible or the Quran or the Gita is the ultimate source of truth for them.  People can choose to believe anything.  They have every right to believe that “Adam ate the apple. / Eve ate Adam. / The serpent ate Eve. / This is the dark intestine.” [Ted Hughes, ‘Theology’]  The problem is when they insist on everyone to accept that dark intestine as the ultimate truth. 

One of today's WhatsApp messages: that 'very great' is a punch in my underbelly
I am a member of many WhatsApp groups more by necessity than choice.  Usually I desist from writing anything in such groups.  Once in a while, however, I respond to something especially if my personal comment is invited.  The latest such exercise got me some chastisement from the ‘religious’ people in that group who thought I was an evil influence with my ‘truths’ which are usually not in tune with religious ‘truths’.  Even if I provide historical or rational evidences for my claims, ‘religious’ people won’t accept.  I have never understood why ‘religious’ people choose to be blatantly blind.

Since I know that such people won’t open their eyes, I refuse to enter into debates with them.  There is no possibility of any common ground between them and me.  Instead of arguing with them, I put up my views in my blog.  They may or may not read.  That’s their choice.  Most of them don’t, I know.  They read only the Bible or the Quran or the Gita.  Let them.  Leave me alone, that’s all what I want.

Father Zossimov makes an interesting observation about such religious people. He says that such people are saved only by the death of their god.  “Men reject their prophets and slay them, but they love their martyrs and honour those whom they have slain,” says the monk.  The crucified Jesus is the most ubiquitous image in Christianity.  And Jesus was slain by the religious leaders of his time.

Religions kill the spirit of the prophet, twist his teachings to suit the needs of the founders of the religions, and then set up the prophet as their god.  It is a god who dances to the tunes played by the believers.  Such believers want others also to dance to those tunes.

The world would be a far better place if such religions didn’t exist. 

Comments

  1. Once you get to understand religions, all religions are in same taste. All the atrocious activities are done for god and yet they believe they will go to heaven. How can god be heaven when all these barbaric activities point out to him alone.


    Responsibility is the greatest fear of humankind as from the beginning. Kean ran from his responsibility as a brother by slaughtering his sibling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, most religions are about power rather than spirituality. It is difficult to believe naively like Browning that "God is in his heaven and all is right with the world."

      Delete
  2. Jesus Christ claimed to be God and said that He will die and rise up on the third day and fulfilled that promise. No other person who has ever lived on the planet has done this. We have more evidence for this than the things that students study. The real problem is that because of sin people do not want follow the teachings of Jesus. They love darkness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Resurrection is a matter of faith and science won't be able to prove it. Not as of now, at least.

      Sin is a fact, a religious word for crime.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...