Skip to main content

Creating Hells

Father Zossimov, a character of Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers, defines hell as “the suffering of being unable to love.”  Zossimov is a monk who thinks that everyone is everyone’s responsibility.  That responsibility is love.  When my fellow being commits an error, it is my error too.  Such is the responsibility of love.

These days I come across a lot of people who cite religious texts and scriptures to stake their claim to truth.  Most of these people who are ready to lay down their very lives for the sake of their gods and religions are incapable of simple human love.  In fact, a good many of them are driven by hatred.  Consequently they create hells for others.

The Bible or the Quran or the Gita is the ultimate source of truth for them.  People can choose to believe anything.  They have every right to believe that “Adam ate the apple. / Eve ate Adam. / The serpent ate Eve. / This is the dark intestine.” [Ted Hughes, ‘Theology’]  The problem is when they insist on everyone to accept that dark intestine as the ultimate truth. 

One of today's WhatsApp messages: that 'very great' is a punch in my underbelly
I am a member of many WhatsApp groups more by necessity than choice.  Usually I desist from writing anything in such groups.  Once in a while, however, I respond to something especially if my personal comment is invited.  The latest such exercise got me some chastisement from the ‘religious’ people in that group who thought I was an evil influence with my ‘truths’ which are usually not in tune with religious ‘truths’.  Even if I provide historical or rational evidences for my claims, ‘religious’ people won’t accept.  I have never understood why ‘religious’ people choose to be blatantly blind.

Since I know that such people won’t open their eyes, I refuse to enter into debates with them.  There is no possibility of any common ground between them and me.  Instead of arguing with them, I put up my views in my blog.  They may or may not read.  That’s their choice.  Most of them don’t, I know.  They read only the Bible or the Quran or the Gita.  Let them.  Leave me alone, that’s all what I want.

Father Zossimov makes an interesting observation about such religious people. He says that such people are saved only by the death of their god.  “Men reject their prophets and slay them, but they love their martyrs and honour those whom they have slain,” says the monk.  The crucified Jesus is the most ubiquitous image in Christianity.  And Jesus was slain by the religious leaders of his time.

Religions kill the spirit of the prophet, twist his teachings to suit the needs of the founders of the religions, and then set up the prophet as their god.  It is a god who dances to the tunes played by the believers.  Such believers want others also to dance to those tunes.

The world would be a far better place if such religions didn’t exist. 

Comments

  1. Once you get to understand religions, all religions are in same taste. All the atrocious activities are done for god and yet they believe they will go to heaven. How can god be heaven when all these barbaric activities point out to him alone.


    Responsibility is the greatest fear of humankind as from the beginning. Kean ran from his responsibility as a brother by slaughtering his sibling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, most religions are about power rather than spirituality. It is difficult to believe naively like Browning that "God is in his heaven and all is right with the world."

      Delete
  2. Jesus Christ claimed to be God and said that He will die and rise up on the third day and fulfilled that promise. No other person who has ever lived on the planet has done this. We have more evidence for this than the things that students study. The real problem is that because of sin people do not want follow the teachings of Jesus. They love darkness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Resurrection is a matter of faith and science won't be able to prove it. Not as of now, at least.

      Sin is a fact, a religious word for crime.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...