Skip to main content

Vengeance



“Vengeance is mine.” God claims in the Bible. [Deuteronomy 32:35, and many other places]

“God is a mean-spirited, pugnacious bully bent on revenge against His children for failing to live up to His impossible standards.” Walt Whitman
 
Image courtesy Robert Hatfield
I wish moral vengeance was a natural law like gravitation. The law of gravitation will wreak its revenge on you if you try to fly from the top of a building. Similarly if there was a natural law for immoral acts, there would be no evil in the world. For example, if you do evil to a person nature will punish you with a proportionate evil.

But nature knows no such morality. On the contrary, nature has an unbalanced proportion of evil. Human civilisations have been relentless efforts to bring nature’s evil under man’s control. And morality is man’s effort to bring under control the evil within himself. Religions are supposed to assist man in the process of making himself virtuous. That they have failed in it miserably is a different matter.

“Should we take revenge? Or forgive and move on? Or tolerate and stay?” This is the prompt of the latest edition of In[di]spire. My personal feeling is that vengeance is evil. It is returning evil with evil. Thus the sum total of evil increases. As the Mahatma said, an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind.

Moreover, there is something terribly paradoxical about vengeance. Vengefulness makes you dependent on those who harmed you. You believe that your release from pain will come only when your enemy suffers. I wouldn’t like my happiness to be dependent on any other person, particularly those who harmed me.

However, what will I do if someone wreaks havoc in my life? Am I magnanimous enough to forgive and move on? Or even tolerate and stay? I’m not sure. No one has wreaked such havoc in my life so far and hence I can’t speak from experience. My gut feeling is that I’m not so magnanimous.

When I watch movies of vengeance where the protagonist decimates the villain[s] I feel the act is justified. There are certain evils which call for vengeful retaliation, my guts tell me. But my rational mind revolts against vengeance too merely because more evil is not the remedy for evil. But would I tell that to Othello if he decided to decimate Iago having come to know the whole story? Nope. Iago deserves decimation. The world will be a better place without Iagos.

In other words, when it is a question of removing certain big evils from the world, vengeance is vindicated as far as my morality is concerned. That is what the protagonists do in movies.

In real life, villains rule the roost, however. We live in a Machiavellian world. Machiavelli counselled the extremes of ‘caress or crush’. If you leave a person with a minor injury, he will return to take revenge, advised Machiavelli. Hence cripple them so much that they are rendered impotent to take revenge. We are actually witnessing this principle in practice nowadays. The present political system in the country seems to be highly Machiavellian. A few are caressed and the majority are crushed. That is why I wish nature had a moral system.

I know that my wish will never, never materialise. So I choose to go with Marcus Aurelius [whom I celebrated in a short story, Marcus Aurelius Dies]: “The best revenge is not to be like your enemy.”

Afterthought: Has it ever struck you that India is increasingly becoming like its enemy? That’s why Shashi Tharoor called it ‘Hindu Pakistan’. Are we taking revenge or are we admiring our enemies by emulating them?






Comments

  1. Anita SabatNovember 6, 2018 at 12:04 PM

    Deep thoughts.
    Great response to my prompt :)
    Even if the villain cripples his enemy, the latter can take revenge by hiring people- just what happened in the Hindi movie Sholay- Gabbar Singh chops off Thakur's arms and the latter gets Jai & Veer to take revenge.
    I feel no one can escape karma.

    Happy Diwali!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalNovember 6, 2018 at 3:04 PM

      I'm glad your prompt brought you here after a long time.

      Indeed in today's world even Machiavelli is outsmarted. We have people to do any work on hire.

      Karma's revenge (or reward) is not always reliable.

      Delete
  2. Abhijit RayNovember 8, 2018 at 11:45 AM

    While vengeance is not right, one should have right to hit back when all else fails. I guess negotiation should be tried. But sometime, negotiation does not help and oppressor does not want to backout. But forgiveness is good for the forgiver if done with right intent and a clean mind. It gives peace of mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalNovember 8, 2018 at 1:03 PM

      I'm with you on this. One cannot go on forgiving endlessly. When all else fails one has to hit back. Otherwise forgiving is a great virtue.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts
9 comments
Read more

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher
19 comments
Read more

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse
8 comments
Read more

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived
16 comments
Read more

Octavian the Guru

Octavian was one of my students in college. Being a student of English literature, he had reasons to establish a personal rapport with me. It took me months to realise that the rapport was fake. He was playing a role for the sake of Rev Machiavelli . Octavian was about 20 years old and I was nearly double his age. Yet he could deceive me too easily. The plain truth is that anyone can deceive me as easily even today. I haven’t learnt certain basic lessons of life. Sheer inability. Some people are like that. Levin would say that my egomania and the concomitant hubris prevented my learning of the essential lessons of life. That would have been true in those days when Octavian took me for a farcical ride. By the time that ride was over, I had learnt at least one thing: that my ego was pulped. More than 20 years have passed after that and I haven’t still learnt to manage affairs in the world of people. That’s why I admit my sheer inability to learn some fundamental lessons of life. Th
8 comments
Read more